Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T11:07:11.381Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sophoclea IV

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

A. C. Pearson
Affiliation:
Trinity College, Cambridge.

Extract

Since the time of Brunck there has been a more or less general acquiescence in his substitution of πνθώμεθα for πνθομεθα, inasmuch as there is no obvious reason to be alleged in support of the optative. Campbell, it is true, found the optative more in accord with the feeling of the blind and weary Oedipus; but who will listen to this nowadays? Therefore it is the more surprising that Radermacher should retain the optative as expressing the eager wish to attain the goal, basing himself on J. M. Stahl's Syntax of the Greek Verb, p. 482. For Stahl, who admits the existence of certain exceptional instances to be justified in this sense, expressly excludes from the category this passage as well as El. 57 and 760, and seeks to limit the scope of his pronouncement to the writings of Aristophanes, Xenophon and the Orators—a curious combination.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1930

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)