Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-8mjnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T18:26:39.146Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

(i.) NooΣ; (ii.) Ta AnaΞiΛea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

Extract

The word νóoς (νoύς) must, if it is inherited from Indo-European, be a word of the λóγoς type, and come from Indo-Eur. nósos, nówos, or nóyos, since a consonant must have been lost, and it is known that only s, w, and y vanished between vowels in Greek. Neither nóyos nor nówos can be traced with a suitable meaning in any Indo-European language; nóyos, on the other hand, would be a very probable ancestor of Skr. nayas. The senses of nayas are, I submit, sufficiently close to those of νóoς to lend some support to the identification. They are: ‘leading, performance, behaviour, worldly wisdom, policy, fundamental principle, system, theory.’

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1923

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Doric βονὃα=βονσόα is fairly well preserved in Etym. Magn. 208. 6, 391. 19; cf. Ahrens, Dial. II., P.77, note 4.