Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T12:13:18.656Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On Achilles Tatius 6.6.3

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

James N. O'Sullivan
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle Upon Tyne

Extract

There are three things to be noticed with regard to ἤκoυoευ ⋯ Λευκíφφη άυoιλoμέυωυ τωυ (a) the hiatus; (b) the fact that in every other place where Achilles Tatius uses άκoὐω with the genitive of the source of the sound and an appended participle the participle always belongs to a verb of speaking used literally (λέγoυτoς 1.8.2.16; 2.36.3.8; ειφόυτoς 3.21.6.13; λαλoὐνς 3.18.1.12 (sc. ταὐτης); ςιαλεγoμέυωυ 2.26.1.15; φoτυιωμέυης 6.15.4.28; ὐφoκπρωoμέυoυ 7.11.1.6) or metaphorically (2.14.8.15 άκoυσαι. . . του ὐδατoς λαλoυυτoς); (c) 2.23.6.11–12 τòυ ψóφoυ άκoὐσας άυoιγoμέυωυ τωυ υυρωυ.

Type
Shorter Notes
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Ed. Vilborg, E. (Stockholm, 1955). In four-number references to the text the fourth number refers to the line on Vilborg's page.Google Scholar

2 clearly must be regarded as passive like the instances of cited later.

3 The same holds good for , as one might expect, and this tells against Carney's unnecessary at 3.11.1.1

4 Note also ibid.

5 Cf.1.4.2