Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T02:19:33.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Theophrastus and the Greek Physiological Psychology before Aristotle - Theophrastus and the Greek Physiological Psychology before Aristotle. By George Malcolm Stratton, Professor of Psychology in the University of California. London and New York, 1917.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1918

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 118 note 1 Arist. De Sens. IV. 443a. And touch he regarded as a complex of sensations, the sense of temperatures, for example, being rightly separated.

page 118 note 2 This I say with great respect, and indeed with diffidence, as Professor Stratton, with whose researches herein mine cannot be compared, takes an opposite view.

page 118 note 3 Greek Theories of Elementary Cognition, by John J. Beare, Oxford, 1906. Cordially I concur with Professor Stratton's criticism, that ‘no one who has not gone over this book almost line by line … can sufficiently appreciate the scholarly care and expository judgment’ (of it). And, I may add, the more thankfully to be received, as much of it, though a necessary, was rather a dull job.

page 119 note 1 The postulate of pores was not earlier than Empedocles (Stratton).

page 119 note 2 Theoph. De Sens. 72–8; and Diels, Vorsok.

page 119 note 3 See Arist. De Sens. Hi. 439b, 31.