Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T06:53:52.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Swedish Scholar on Seneca - Bertil Axelson. Senecastudien: Kritische Bemerkungen zu Senecas Naturales Quaestiones. Pp. viii + 119. (Lunds Universitets Årsskrift. N. F. Avd. 1. Bd. 29. Nr. 3.) Lund: Universitets Biblioteket, 1933. Paper, 4 kr.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Walter C. Summers
Walter C. Summers
Affiliation:
Torquay.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , May 1934 , pp. 79 - 80
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1934

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 I must however demur to the citation of Ep. 33 1 as an instance of ‘suppressed only.’ I suggested there the change of quae to aliqua (so that eminent, notabilia sunt should be simply parallel verbs, with asyndeton), because ‘be sure there is unevenness when what is prominent is remarkable’ reminded me of the nonsense sentence inter sepulchra monumenta sunt with which Porcius Latro lured his class to ill-considered applause, and the insertion of ‘only’ before ‘what is prominent’ seems to me to make matters a little worse.