Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-94d59 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T04:49:45.872Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some New Texts of Cicero - M. Tulli Ciceronis scripta quae manserunt omnia. Vol. VI, 1. Oratio de Imperio Cn. Pompei: recognouit P. Reis; orationes pro A. Cluentio, de Lege Agraria, pro C. Rabirio perduellionis reo: recognouit L. Fruechtel. Pp. xiv + 247. Vol. VI, 2. Orationes in L. Catilinam IV, pro Archia poeta: recognouit P. Reis; orationes pro L. Murena, pro Sulla: recognouit H. Kasten; oratio pro L. Flacco: recognouit L. Fruechtel. Pp. xxx + 256. (Bibliotheca Scriptorum Graecorum et Romanorum Teubneriana.) Leipzig: Teubner, 1933. Paper, RM. 8 and 8.40 (bound, 9.20 and 9.60). - Cicéron: Traité du Destin. Texte établi et traduit par A. Yon. Pp. lxiv+72. (Collection des Universites de France.) Paris: ‘Les Belles Lettres,’ 1933. Paper, 12 frs.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

G. B. A. Fletcher
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool.

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1934

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Caution seems necessary in using Mr. T. B. L. Webster's work. For example, is cuicuimodi really the reading of V at Fl. 40, and not, as Clark and Fruechtel say, a conjecture of Schuetz? In the Cusan excerpts Mr. Webster differs from Fruechtel in giving as the MS. reading uestro testimonio, no indices after uiri (uirtutem Halm), no atque honestissimae after amplissimae, and iudicio. Iudicio is given by Fruechtel as Klein's conjecture for indicium. Will Mr. Webster have us believe that Klein had iudicio before him ? What with Fruechtel is frag. 17 is not given by Mr. Webster.