Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T11:21:17.863Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Orphism - Louis Moulinier: Orphée et l'orphisme ὰ l'époque classique. Pp. 128. Paris: ‘Les Belles Lettres’, 1955. Paper, 900 fr.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2009

W. K. C. Guthrie
Affiliation:
Peterhouse, Cambridge

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 263 note 1 I made the same mistake twenty years ago in Orpheus and Greek Religion. It was pointed out by Ch. Picard in 1936 and corrected in a note in the second printing.

page 264 note 1 Metzger, , Les représentations dans le céramique attique du IVe siècle (1951), p. 262, n. 3.Google Scholar The vase is illustrated in Guthrie, Orph. and Gk. Rel. (1935 and 1952), p. 131.

page 264 note 2 For vases showing Lycurgus killing Dryas, see Beazley, , Greek Vases in Poland (1928), pp. 4446Google Scholar. The first vase mentioned above has been published in C.V.A. Cracow, pl. 12. 1. For the second, see Cultrera, ‘Hydria a figure rosse del Museo di Villa Giulia’ (Opere d'Arte, fasc. viii, 1938). I owe these references, as well as the explanation of his own views, to the kindness of Sir John Beazley, who also states that the second vase is Attic, not Italiote as Cultrera says.