Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T17:11:13.980Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Less Radical Interpretation of Davidson and Quine*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2009

Robert Sinclair
Robert Sinclair
Affiliation:
Simon Fraser University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Critical Notice/Étude critique
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , Winter 2006 , pp. 107 - 124
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cutrofello, Andrew 1999 “The Transcendental Pretensions of the Principle of Charity.” In The Philosophy of Donald Davidson. Edited by Hahn, L.. La Salle: Open Court, pp. 333–41.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1984a “Belief and the Basis of Meaning.” In Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 141–54.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1984b “On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme.” In Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 183–98.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1984c “Radical Interpretation.” In Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 125–39.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1985 “A New Basis for Decision Theory.” Theory and Decision, 18: 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1993 “The Third Man.” Critical Inquiry, 19: 607–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1994a “On Quine's Philosophy.” Theoria, 60: 184–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1994b “Radical Interpretation Interpreted.” In Philosophical Perspectives. Vol. 8: Logic and Language. Edited by Tomberlin, J.. Atascadero: Ridgeview, pp. 121–28.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1999a “Reply to Barry Stroud.” In The Philosophy of Donald Davidson. Edited by Hahn, L.. La Salle: Open Court, pp. 162–65.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1999b “Reply to A. C. Genova.” In The Philosophy of Donald Davidson. Edited by Hahn, L.. La Salle: Open Court, pp. 192–94.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1999c “Reply to Thomas Nagel.” In The Philosophy of Donald Davidson. Edited by Hahn, L.. La Salle: Open Court, pp. 207–209.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1999d “Reply to Andrew Cutrofello.” In The Philosophy of Donald Davidson. Edited by Hahn, L.. La Salle: Open Court, pp. 342–44.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald 2000 “Perils and Pleasures of Interpretation.” Ars Interpretandi, 5: 2137.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald 2001a “Three Varieties of Knowledge.” In Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 205–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald 2001b “Comments on Karlovy Vary Papers.” In Interpreting Davidson. Edited by Kotatko, P., Pagin, P., and Segal, G.. Stanford, CA: CLSI Publications, pp. 285–307.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald 2003 “Quine's Externalism.” In Fifty Years of Quine's ‘Two Dogmas’ (Grazer Philosophische Studien, 66: 281–97). Edited by Glock, H. J., Glüer, K., and Keil, G.. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Genova, A. C. 1999 “The Very Idea of Massive Truth.” In The Philosophy of Donald Davidson. Edited by Hahn, L.. La Salle: Open Court, pp. 167–91.Google Scholar
Hurley, S. L. 1989 Natural Reasons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maker, William 1991 “Davidson's Transcendental Arguments.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 51: 345–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1960 Word and Object. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1970 “Philosophical Progress in Language Theory.” Metaphilosophy, 1: 2–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1975 “Mind and Verbal Dispositions.” In Mind and Language. Edited by Guttenplan, S.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 83–95.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1986 “Reply to Manley Thompson.” In The Philosophy of W. V. Quine. Edited by Hahn, L. and Schilpp, P. A.. La Salle: Open Court Press, pp. 564–68.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1987 “Indeterminacy of Translation Again.” Journal of Philosophy, 84: 5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1994 “Indeterminacy without Tears.” Il Cannocchiale, 1/2: 57–58.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1995 “Reactions.” In On Quine: New Essays. Edited by Leonard, P. and Santambrogio, M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 347–61.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1996 “Progress on Two Fronts.” Journal of Philosophy, 93: 159–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramberg, Bjørn 2001 “What Davidson Said to the Sceptic.” In Interpreting Davidson. Edited by Kotatko, P., Pagin, P., and Segal, G.. Stanford, CA: CLSI Publications, pp. 213–36.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard 1991 Objectivity, Relativism and Truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard 1998 “McDowell, Davidson and Spontaneity.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 58: 389–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, Robert 2002a “What Is Radical Interpretation? Davidson, Fodor and the Naturalization of Philosophy.” Inquiry, 45: 161–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, Robert 2002b “Stimulus Meaning Reconsidered.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 40: 395–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, Robert 2005 “The Philosophical Significance of Triangulation: Locating Davidson's Non-Reductive Naturalism.” Metaphilosophy, 36: 708–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar