Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T17:24:07.044Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Washing Away Original Sinn*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

Eros Corazza
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bach, Kent 1997Do Belief Reports Report Beliefs?Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 78, 3: 215–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castañeda, Hector-Neri 1966‘He’: A Study in the Logic of Self-Consciousness.” Ratio, 8, 2: 130–57.Google Scholar
Castañeda, Hector-Neri 1967Indicators and Quasi-Indicators.” American Philosophical Quarterly, 4, 2: pp. 85100.Google Scholar
Corazza, Eros 1998 “‘She’: Pragmatically Imparted or Semantically Encoded?” In Thought, Language and Ontology: Essays in Memory of Hector-Neri Castañeda. Edited by Orilia, Francesco and Rapaport, William. Dordrecht, Holland: Kluver Academic Publishers, pp. 217–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dummett, Michael 1973 Frege: Philosophy of Language. 2nd ed. 1981. Oxford: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Dummett, Michael 1978 Truth and Other Enigmas. Oxford: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Evans, Gareth 1981 “Understanding Demonstratives.” In Collected Papers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 291321.Google Scholar
Forbes, Graeme 1987a “Indexicals and Intentionality: A Fregean Perspective.” The Philosophical Review, 96, 1: 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, Graeme 1987b “A Dichotomy Sustained.” Philosophical Studies, 51, pp. 187211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, Graeme 1990The Indispensability of SinnThe Philosophical Review, 99, 4: 535–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frege, Gottlob 1892 “Sense and Meaning.” In Translations from the Philosophical Writings of G. Frege. Edited by Black, Max and Geach, Paul. Oxford: Blackwell, 1952, pp. 5678.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob 1918 “Thoughts.” In Positions and Attitudes. Edited by Salmon, Nathan and Soames, Scott. Propositions and Attitudes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988, pp. 3355.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob 1979 Posthumous Writings. Oxford: B. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kripke, Saul 1979 “A Puzzle about Belief.” In Positions and Attitudes. Edited by Salmon, Nathan and Soames, Scott. Propositions and Attitudes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988, pp. 102148.Google Scholar
Loar, Brian 1988 “Social Content and Psychological Content.” In Content of Thought. Edited by Grimm, R. H. and Merrill, D. D.. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, pp. 99110.Google Scholar
McGinn, Colin 1983 The Subjective View. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Perry, John 1977Frege on Demonstratives.” The Philosophical Review, 86, 4: 474–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Recanati, Francois 1995 “The Communication of First Person Thoughts.” In Frege: Sense and Reference One Hundred Years Later. Edited by Biro, John and Kotatko, Peter. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher, pp. 95102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, Marc 1990 Propositional Attitudes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, Gabriel 1989A Preference for Sense and Reference.” Journal of Philosophy, 8: 7389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stich, Stephen 1983 From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar