Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T13:55:10.844Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

La théorie des catégories de Sommers: une nouvelle introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

George Englebretsen  and
Odette Mercure (traductrice)
George Englebretsen
Affiliation:
Bishop's University
Odette Mercure (traductrice)
Affiliation:
Bishop's University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Les travaux de Fred Sommers dans le domaine de l'ontologie (l'étude des catégories) ont été l'objet, jusqu'à présent, de beaucoup moins d'attention critique qu'ils ne sont aptes à en susciter. C'est au cours des années soixante que Sommers a élaboré sa théorie et qu'il l'a rendue publique par le moyen d'une série d'articles et de conférences. Bien que ses travaux aient alors fait l'objet de quelques critiques ou commentaires, ils ont, depuis, généralement été passés sous silence. Récemment, la revue Monist a fait paraître un numéro spécial entièrement consacré au thème des catégories. Considérant le thème, l'importance et la qualité des articles regroupés dans ce numéro, il est surprenant de constater que les idées hautement originales et suggestives de Sommers ne soient mentionnées par aucun des auteurs. Evidemment, une des raisons pour lesquelles les idées de Sommers suscitent présentement si peu d'intérêt est le fait que, depuis la fin des années soixante, il a lui-même laissé de côté l'ontologie pour se tourner vers la logique—un domaine où il a fait et fait toujours couler beaucoup d'encre.

Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , Autumn 1988 , pp. 451 - 473
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliographie

Black, M., 1965 Philosophy in America. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Brody, B., 1972 «Sommers on Predicability», Philosophical Studies 23/2, 138–140.Google Scholar
Cauman, L., Levi, I., Parsons, C. et Schwartz, R., 1983 How Many Questions? Essays in Honour of Sidney Morgenbesser. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Chandler, H., 1968 «Persons and Predicability», Australasian Journal of Philosophy 46/2, 112–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cogan, R., 1976 «A Criticism of Sommers' Language Tree», Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 17/2, 308–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornman, J. W., 1968 «Types, Categories and Nonsense», Studies in Logical Theory, American Philosophical Quarterly (Monograph 2), 73–97.Google Scholar
Cornman, J. W., 1976 «Language and Ontology», dans Rorty (1976, 160–167).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Sousa, R. B., 1966 «The Tree of English Bears Bitter Fruit», Journal of Philosophy 63/2, 37–46.Google Scholar
Drange, T., 1966 Type Crossings. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elgood, A. G., 1970 «Sommers' Rules of Sense», Philosophical Quarterly 20/79, 166–169.Google Scholar
Elgood, A. G., 1974 «Categories in Natural Language», Philosophical Quarterly 24/94, 17–26.Google Scholar
Englebretsen, G., 1971a «Elgood on Sommers' Rules of Sense», Philosophical Quarterly 21/82, 71–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Englebretsen, G., 1971b «Sommers' Theory and the Paradox of Confirmation», Philosophy of Science 38/3, 438–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Englebretsen, G., 1971c «On the Nature of Sommers' Rule», Mind 80/320, 608–611.Google Scholar
Englebretsen, G., 1972a «Vacuousity», Mind 81/322, 273–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Englebretsen, G., 1972b «On Van Straaten's Modification of Sommers' Rule», Philosophical Studies 23/3, 216–219.Google Scholar
Englebretsen, G., 1972c «True Sentences and True Propositions», Mind 81/323, 451–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Englebretsen, G., 1972d «Persons and Predicates», Philosophical Studies 23, 393–399.Google Scholar
Englebretsen, G., 1972e «Erwin on the Category Mistake Argument», Second Order 3/1, 47–53.Google Scholar
Englebretsen, G., 1974 «Brody on Sommers», Philosophical Studies 25/2, 251–252.Google Scholar
Englebretsen, G., 1975a «Sommers' Natural Theology», International Journal for the Philosophy of Religion 6/2, 111–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Englebretsen, G., 1975b Speaking of Persons. Halifax: Dalhousie University Press.Google Scholar
Englebretsen, G., 1976 «Sommers' Tree Theory and Possible Things», Philosophical Studies (Irelande) 24, 131–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Englebretsen, G., 1981 Logical Negation. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Erwin, E., 1970 The Concept of Meaninglessness. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fjeld, J., 1974 «Sommers' Ontological Programme», Philosophical Studies 25, 411–416.Google Scholar
Greenburg, R. S., 1972 «Individuals and the Theory of Predication», Journal of Philosophy 69, 435–448.Google Scholar
Goldstick, D., 1974 «Against Categories», Philosophical Studies 25, 337–356.Google Scholar
Guerry, H., 1967 «Sommers' Ontological Proof», Analysis 28/2, 60–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haack, S., 1968 «Equivocity: A Discussion of Sommers' Views», Analysis 28/5, 159–165.Google Scholar
Keil, F. C., 1979 Semantic and Conceptual Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lakatos, I., 1967 Problems in the Philosophy of Mathematics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Lappin, S., 1981 Sorts, Ontology, and Metaphor. Berlin: W. de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, R. L., 1969 «Sommers on Denial and Negation», Nous 3/2, 219–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massie, D., 1967 «Sommers' Tree Theory: A Reply to DeSousa», Journal of Philosophy 64/6, 185–193.Google Scholar
Nelson, J. O., 1964 «On Sommers' Reinstatement of Russell's Ontological Program», Philosophical Review 73/4, 517–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odegard, D., 1966 «Absurdity and Types», Mind 75/297, 97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passell, D., 1969 «On Sommers' Logic and Sense and Nonsense», Mind 78/309, 132–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhardt, L. R., 1965–1966 «Dualism and Categories», Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 66, 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richmond, S. A., 1971 «Sommers on Predicability», Journal of Philosophy 68/5, 138–142.Google Scholar
Richmond, S. A., 1975 «A Possible Empirical Violation of Sommers' Rule for Enforcing Ambiguity», Philosophical Studies 28, 363–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, R., 1976 The Linguistic Turn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sayward, C., 1976 «A Defense of Sommers», Philosophical Studies 29, 349–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayward, C., 1981 «The Tree Theory and Isomorphism», Analysis 41/1, 6–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayward, C., et Voss, S., 1972 «Absurdity and Spanning», Philosophia 2/3, 227–238.Google Scholar
Sayward, C., et Voss, S., 1980 «The Structure of Type Theory», Journal of Philosophy 77/5, 241–259.Google Scholar
Schirn, M., 1976 Studies on Frege, III. Stuttgart: Friedrich Frommann Verlag.Google Scholar
Sommers, F., 1959 «The Ordinary Language Tree», Mind 68/270, 160–185.Google Scholar
Sommers, F., 1963a «Meaning Relations and the Analytic», Journal of Philosophy 60, 524–534.Google Scholar
Sommers, F., 1963b «Types and Ontology», Philosophical Review 72, 327–363.Google Scholar
Sommers, F., 1964 «A Program for Coherence», Philosophical Review 73/4, 522–527.Google Scholar
Sommers, F., 1965 «Predicability», dans Black (1965, 262–281).Google Scholar
Sommers, F., 1966a «Why Is There Something and Not Nothing?» Analysis 26/6, 177–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommers, F., 1966b «What We Can Say About God», Judaism 15/1, 61–73.Google Scholar
Sommers, F., 1967 «On a Fregean Dogma», dans Lakatos (1967, 47–62).Google Scholar
Sommers, F., 1969 «Do We Need Identity?» Journal of Philosophy 66, 499–504.Google Scholar
Sommers, F., 1970 «The Calculus of Terms», Mind 79/313, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommers, F., 1970–1971 «Confirmation and the Natural Subject», Philosophical Forum 2/2, 245–250.Google Scholar
Sommers, F., 1971 «Structural Ontology», Philosophia 1/1–2, 21–42.Google Scholar
Sommers, F., 1973 «The Logical and the Extra-Logical», Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14, 235–252.Google Scholar
Sommers, F., 1976 «Frege or Leibniz?», dans Schirn (1976, 11–34).Google Scholar
Sommers, F., 1978 «The Grammar of Thought» Journal of Social and Biological Structures 1, 39–51.Google Scholar
Sommers, F., 1982 The Logic of Natural Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sommers, F., 1983 «Linguistic Grammar and Logical Grammar», dans Cauman, Levi, Parsons et Schwartz (1983, 180–194).Google Scholar
Suzman, J., 1972 «The Ordinary Language Lattice», Mind 81/323, 434–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanson, J. W., 1967 «Denial in First Order Logic», Analysis 27/5, 171–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swiggart, P., 1972 «The Limits of Statement Denial», Mind 81/323, 437–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Straaten, R., 1968 «Sommers' Rule and Equivocity», Analysis 29/2, 58–61.Google Scholar
Van Straaten, R., 1971 «A Modification of Sommers' Rule», Philosophical Studies 22, 16–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D., 1973 «On Types and Ontology», Second Order 2/1, 73–81.Google Scholar