Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T20:46:27.346Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ronald M. Yoshida: “Reduction in The Physical Sciences.” (Philosophy in Canada, Vol. 4) Dalhousie: Dalhousie University Press, 1977. 90 pages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2010

Cliff Hooker
Cliff Hooker
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Yoshida's explicit aim is to defend the standard empiricist model of reduction-bydeduction (SERM hereafter) from recent attacks. Thus the treatment is limited in both scope and orientation.

I shall argue that Yoshida does not succeed. The failure is both internal (on his own terms) and external (what is outside his scope).

Type
Critical Notices/Études Critiques
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , March 1979 , pp. 81 - 99
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Campbell, N. R., Foundations of Science, New York: Dover, 1957.Google Scholar
[2]Causey, R. L., The Unity of Science, Dordrecht: Reidel, 1977.Google Scholar
[3]Friedman, K. S., “A Partial Unification of Ergodic Theory”, Philosophy of Science, 43 (1976), 151–162.Google Scholar
[4]Harper, W. L. & Hooker, C. A., Proceedings of an International Colloquium on Probability and Statistics and Statistical Theories of Science, 3 volumes, Dordrecht: Reidel, 1975Google Scholar
[5]Hooker, C. A., Contemporary Research in the Foundations and Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics, Dordrecht: Reidel, 1973.Google Scholar
[6]Hooker, C. A., “Physics and Metaphysics: A Prolegomenon for the Riddles of Quantum Theory”, in [5].Google Scholar
[7]Hooker, C. A., “The Metaphysics of Science: Atoms versus Plena”, International Logic Review 9, (1974), 111–146.Google Scholar
[8]Hooker, C. A., “CriticalNotice: Against Method, P.K. Feyerabend”, The Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 1. (1972) 489–509.Google Scholar
[9]Hooker, C. A., “Systematic Realism”, Synthese 26 (1974), 409–497.Google Scholar
[10]Hooker, C. A., “Systematic Philosophy and Meta-Philosophy of Science: Empiricism, Popperian and Realism”, Synthese 32 (1975), 177–231.Google Scholar
[11]Hooker, C. A., “Global Theories”, Philosophy of Science 43, (1975), 152–179.Google Scholar
[12]Hooker, C. A., “A Realist Doctrine of Perception and aNihilist Doctrine of the Secondary Qualities”, to appear in Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. IV, 1977.Google Scholar
[13]Hooker, C. A., Logico-Algebraic Approach to Quantum Theory, Vol. I, Dordrecht: Reidel, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Hooker, C. A., Systematic Philosophy and the Secondary Qualities, forthcoming.Google Scholar
[15]Hooker, C. A., Systematic Evolutionary Naturalistic Realism, forthcoming.Google Scholar
[16]Marsden, J. E., Chernoff, P. E., “Some Remarks on Hamiltonian Systems and Quantum Mechanics” in [4], vol. III.Google Scholar
[17]Putnam, H., “On Properties” in Rescher, N., ed.) Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel, Dordrecht: Reidel, 1970.Google Scholar
[18]Sklar, L., “Thermodynamics, Statistical Mechanics and the Complexity of Reductions” (in) Cohen, R. S. et al. (eds.) PSA 1974, Dordrecht: Reidel, 1976.Google Scholar
[19]Sklar, L., “Statistical Explanation and Ergodic Theory”, Philosophy of Science, 40 (1973), 194–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20]Tisza, L., “Classical Statistical Mechanics versus Quantal Statistical Thermodynamics: A Study in Contrasts”, in [4], vol. 3.Google Scholar
[21]Zenzen, M., “Popper, Grunbaum and De Facto Irreversibility”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 28 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar