Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-nwzlb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T04:13:48.895Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The influence of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus ssp. oleifera var. biennis) canopy size on grass weed growth and grass weed seed return

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2007

L. C. SIM*
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences (TOB2), University of Reading, Earley Gate Reading RG6 6AU, UK
R. J. FROUD-WILLIAMS
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences (TOB2), University of Reading, Earley Gate Reading RG6 6AU, UK
M. J. GOODING
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences (TOB2), University of Reading, Earley Gate Reading RG6 6AU, UK
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed.

Summary

Four experiments conducted over three seasons (2002–05) at the Crops Research Unit, University of Reading, investigated effects of canopy management of autumn sown oilseed rape (Brassica napus L. ssp. oleifera var. biennis (DC.) Metzg.) on competition with grass weeds. Emphasis was placed on the effect of the crop on the weeds.

Rape canopy size was manipulated using sowing date, seed rate and the application of autumn fertilizer. Lolium multiflorum Lam., Lboucheanum Kunth and Alopecurus myosuroides Huds. were sown as indicative grass weeds.

The effects of sowing date, seed rate and autumn nitrogen on crop competitive ability were correlated with rape biomass and fractional interception of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) by the rape floral layer, to the extent that by spring there was good evidence of crop: weed replacement.

An increase in seed rate up to the highest plant densities tested increased both rape biomass and competitiveness, e.g. in 2002/3, L. multiflorum head density was reduced from 539 to 245 heads/m2 and spikelet density from 13 170 to 5960 spikelets/m2 when rape plant density was increased from 16 to 81 plants/m2. Spikelets/head of Lolium spp. was little affected by rape seed rate, but the length of heads of A. myosuroides was reduced by 9% when plant density was increased from 29–51 plants/m2.

Autumn nitrogen increased rape biomass and reduced L. multiflorum head density (415 and 336 heads/m2 without and with autumn nitrogen, respectively) and spikelet density (9990 and 8220 spikelets/m2 without and with autumn nitrogen, respectively). The number of spikelets/head was not significantly affected by autumn nitrogen.

Early sowing could increase biomass and competitiveness, but poor crop establishment sometimes overrode the effect. Where crop and weed establishment was similar for both sowing dates, a 2-week delay (i.e. early September to mid-September) increased L. multiflorum head density from 226 to 633 heads/m2 and spikelet density from 5780 to 15 060 spikelets/m2.

Type
Crops and Soils
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andersson, B. & Bengtsson, D. G. (1989). The influence of row spacing, seed rate, and sowing time on overwintering and yield in winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research 19, 129134.Google Scholar
Anonymous (1962). Irrigation. Bulletin No. 138. London: Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food.Google Scholar
Anonymous (2001). Galtak and Benazalox Booklet. Ongar, Essex, UK: Aventis Crop Science UK, Ltd.Google Scholar
Anonymous (2004). Dow Agroservices Product Guide. Hitchen, Herts, UK: Dow Agroservices Ltd.Google Scholar
Anslow, R. C. & Green, J. O. (1967). The seasonal growth of pasture grasses. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 68, 109122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barraclough, P. B. (1989). Root growth and nutrient uptake by field crops under temperate conditions. Aspects of Applied Biology 22, 227233. Roots and the Soil Environment.Google Scholar
Bilsborrow, P. E. (1985). Physiology of yield of oilseed rape. PhD Thesis, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
Black, I. D. & Dyson, C. B. (1993). An economic threshold model for spraying herbicides in cereals. Weed Research 33, 279290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Champion, G. T., Froud-Williams, R. J. & Holland, J. M. (1998). Interaction between wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivar, row spacing and density and the effect on weed suppression and crop yield. Annals of Applied Biology 133, 443453.Google Scholar
Darby, R. J. & Yeoman, D. P. (1994). Effects of methods of cereal straw disposal, seedbed preparation and sowing method on the establishment, yield and oil content of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 122, 393404.Google Scholar
Decagon Devices, Inc. (1989). Sunfleck Ceptometer User Manual. Pullman, WA, USA: Decagon Devices, Inc.Google Scholar
DEFRA (2000). Fertilizer Recommendations for Agricultural and Horticultural Crops (RB209). London: HMSO.Google Scholar
DEFRA (2004). 2003 Harvest: Final Estimates of Oilseed Rape Production, United Kingdom. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Evans, P. S. (1978). Plant root distribution and water use patterns of some pasture and crop species. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 21, 261265.Google Scholar
Fray, M. J., Evans, E. J., Lydiate, D. J. & Arther, A. E. (1996). Physiological assessment of apetalous flowers and erectophile pods in oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 127, 193200.Google Scholar
HGCA (2000). Effective Winter Oilseed Rape Canopies – Topic sheet No. 37. London: Home Grown Cereals Authority.Google Scholar
HGCA (2004). H.G.C.A. Recommended Lists. 2003/4. London: Home Grown Cereals Authority.Google Scholar
Jenkins, P. D. & Leitch, M. H. (1986). Effects of sowing date on the growth and yield of winter oil-seed rape (Brassica napus). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 107, 405420.Google Scholar
Küst, G., Heitefuss, R. & Wahmhoff, W. (1988). Studies on the determination of damage thresholds for volunteer barley in winter rape. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflanzenschutz Sonderheft 11, 139145.Google Scholar
Leach, J. E., Darby, R. J., Williams, I. H., Fitt, B. D. L. & Rawlinson, C. J. (1994). Factors affecting growth and yield of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus), 1985–89. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 122, 405413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lunn, G. D., Spink, J. H., Stokes, D. T., Wade, A., Clare, R. W. & Scott, R. K. (2001). Canopy Management in Winter Oilseed Rape. Project report No. OS49. London: Home Grown Cereals Authority.Google Scholar
Lunn, G. D., Spink, J. H., Wade, A. & Clare, R. W. (2003). Spring Remedial Treatments to Improve Canopy Structure and Yield in Winter Oilseed Rape. Research Project No. OS64. London: Home Grown Cereals Authority.Google Scholar
Lutman, P. J. W. (1989). Objectives of weed control in oilseed rape. Aspects of Applied Biology 23, 199210. Production and Protection of Oilseed Rape and other Brassica Crops.Google Scholar
Lutman, P. J. W. (1991). Weeds in Oilseed Crops. Research review OS2. London: Home Grown Cereals Authority.Google Scholar
Lutman, P. J. W. & Dixon, F. L. (1985). The effect of the timing of control of grass weeds on the yield of oilseed rape. In Proceedings of the British Crop Protection Conference Weeds – 1985, pp. 209216. Croydon, UK: BCPC Publications.Google Scholar
Lutman, P. J. W. & Dixon, F. L. (1987). The effect of drilling date on the growth and yield of oil-seed rape (Brassica napus L.). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 108, 195200.Google Scholar
Lutman, P. J. W. & Dixon, F. L. (1990). The competitive effects of volunteer barley (Hordeum vulgare) on the growth of oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Annals of Applied Biology 117, 633644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutman, P. J. W., Bowerman, P., Palmer, G. M., Andrews, F. & Whytock, G. P. (1995). Cost Effective Weed Control in Winter Oilseed Rape. Project report No. OS15. London: Home Grown Cereals Authority.Google Scholar
Lutman, P. J. W., Bowerman, P., Palmer, G. M. & Whytock, G. P. (2000). Prediction of competition between oilseed rape and Stellaria media. Weed Research 40, 255269.Google Scholar
MAFF (1983). Oilseed Rape. MAFF Booklet 2278. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
McWilliam, S. C., Stafford, J. A., Scott, R. K., Norton, G., Stokes, D. T. & Sylvester-Bradley, R. (1995 a). The relationship between canopy structure and yield in oilseed rape. In Rapeseed Today and Tomorrow: Proceedings of the 9th International Rapeseed Congress, Cambridge (Ed. Murphy, D.), pp. 491493. Cambridge, UK: GCRIC.Google Scholar
McWilliam, S. C., Stokes, D. T., Scott, R. K., Norton, G., Sylvester-Bradley, R. & Davies, D. B. (1995 b). The Relationship between Establishment and Yield of Autumn-sown Oilseed Rape. Project report OS13. London: Home Grown Cereals Authority.Google Scholar
Mendham, N. J. (1996). Physiological basis of seed yield and quality in oilseed rape. In Rapeseed Today and Tomorrow: Proceedings of the 9th International Rapeseed Congress, Cambridge (Ed. Murphy, D.), pp. 485495. Cambridge, UK: GCRIC.Google Scholar
Mendham, N. J., Shipway, P. A. & Scott, R. K. (1981 a). The effects of delayed sowing and weather on growth, development and yield of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 96, 389416.Google Scholar
Mendham, N. J., Shipway, P. A. & Scott, R. K. (1981 b). The effects of seed size, autumn N and plant population density on the response to delayed sowing in winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 96, 417428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Met Office (2006). Met Office Weather and Climate Statistics. Available online at http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/weather/index.html (verified 14/11/06).Google Scholar
Mohler, C. L. (2001). Enhancing the competitive ability of crops. In Ecological management of agricultural weeds (Eds Liebman, M., Mohler, C. L. & Staver, C. P.), pp. 269321. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, M. J., McVetty, P. B. E. & Shaykewich, C. F. (1989). The determination and verification of a baseline temperature for the growth of Westar summer rape. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 69, 455464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NIAB (2001). 2001 Oilseeds Variety Handbook. Cambridge, UK: National Institute of Agricultural Biology.Google Scholar
Payne, R. W., Lane, P. W., Digby, P. G. N., Harding, S. A., Leech, P. K., Morgan, G. W., Todd, A. D., Thompson, R., Tunnicliffe, Wilson G., Welham, S. J. & White, R. P. (1993). Genstat 5 Release 3 Reference Manual. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, D. & Morrod, R. S. (1976). Relative importance of factors influencing the activity of herbicides in soil. In Proceedings of the British Crop Protection Conference – Weeds, pp. 971980.Google Scholar
Sansome, G. (1989). Effect of crop populations on the performance of herbicides in winter oilseed rape. Aspects of Applied Biology 23, 257262. Production and protection of oilseed rape and other brassica crops.Google Scholar
Sansome, G. (1991). The effect of oilseed rape populations on weeds, herbicide performance and crop yields. In Proceedings of the British Crop Protection Conference – Weeds, pp. 12251232.Google Scholar
Scarisbrick, D. H., Danials, R. W. & Noor, Rawi A. B. (1982). The effect of varying seed rate on the yield and yield components of oil-seed rape (Brassica napus). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 99, 561568.Google Scholar
Sharma, M. P. & Vanden, Born W. H. (1983). Crop competition aids efficacy of wild oat herbicides. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 63, 503507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sim, L. C. (2005). The influence of oilseed rape (Brassica napus) canopy management on grass weed growth and grass weed seed return. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Sim, L. C., Froud-Williams, R. J. & Gooding, M. J. (2007). The influence of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus ssp. oleifera var. biennis) cultivar and grass genotype on the competitive balance between crop and grass weed. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 145 (published online).Google Scholar
Spedding, C. R. W. & Diekmahns, E. C. (1972). Grass and Legumes in British Agriculture. Bulletin 49. Farnham Royal, Bucks., UK: Commonwealth Bureaux of Pastures and Field Crops. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Storkey, J. & Cussans, J. W. (2000). Relationship between temperature and the early growth of Triticum aestivum and three weed species. Weed Science 48, 467473.Google Scholar
Webb, N. (1991). Delta – T Image Analysis System, Dias 2 – User Manual (DIAS – UM – 1.10). Cambridge, UK: Delta-T Devices Ltd.Google Scholar
Weed Resistance Action Group (2003). Managing and Preventing Herbicide Resistance in Weeds. London: Home Grown Cereals Authority.Google Scholar
Weihing, R. M. (1963). Growth of ryegrass as influenced by temperature and solar radiation. Agronomy Journal 55, 519521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiner, J., Griepentrog, H.-W. & Kristensen, L. (2001). Suppression of weeds by spring wheat Triticum aestivum increases with crop density and spatial uniformity. Journal of Applied Ecology 38, 784790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, R. (2002). The UK Pesticide Guide 2002. Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK/Farnham, Surrey, UK: CAB International/British Crop Protection Council.Google Scholar
Wilson, B. J., Wright, K. J., Brain, P., Clements, M. & Stephens, E. (1995). Predicting the competitive effects of weed and crop density on weed biomass, weed seed production and crop yield in wheat. Weed Research 35, 265278.Google Scholar
Zaicou-Kunesch, C. M., Zaheer, S. H. & Eksteen, D. (2003). Does Increasing Canola Seeding Rate Reduce the Competitiveness of Grass Weeds? Agribusiness Crop Updates 2003. South Perth, Western Australia: Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar