Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T13:56:53.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Convict Carpets: Jails and the Revival of Historic Carpet Design in Colonial India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2013

Abigail McGowan
Get access

Abstract

One promising traditional industry slated for revival in late colonial India was carpet weaving. Characterized by low technology, high product value, and strong demand, carpets appealed for obvious economic reasons, while simultaneously evoking India's luxurious artisanal past. In western India, carpet weaving was centered in jails where convicts produced high-quality rugs using historic designs in prison factories that served as laboratories for redefining penal labor and traditional design under the eyes of the colonial state. For, even as they were poised at the center of new exchange networks of design ideas, jail factories also claimed practical economic goals: to earn money for jails, train convicts in new skills and habits, and build India's productive potential in a time of economic malaise. As such, they provide an ideal site for examining the economic context for the emerging design industry, and for limitations of colonial visions of the Indian economy.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 72 , Issue 2 , May 2013 , pp. 391 - 416
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Ahuja, Shyam. 1999. Dhurrie: Flatwoven Rugs of India. Mumbai: India Book House.Google Scholar
Andrews, F. H. 1906. “Indian Carpets and Rugs.” Journal of Indian Arts and Industries 11(94):5–10.Google Scholar
Annual Report on the Bombay Jails. 1863, 1879, 1883, 1888, 1893, 1898, 1901. Bombay: Government Press.Google Scholar
Arnold, David. 1994. “The Colonial Prison: Power, Knowledge, and Penology in Nineteenth-Century India.” In Subaltern Studies VIII: Essays in Honour of Ranajit Guha, eds. Arnold, David and Hardiman, David, 148–84. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Arnold, David. 1995. Colonizing the Body: State Medicine and Epidemic Disease in Nineteenth Century India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Birdwood, George. 1880. The Industrial Arts of India. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Brendon, B. A. [1899] 1976. A Monograph on the Woollen Fabrics of the Bombay Presidency. Art in Industry Through the Ages: Monograph Series of Bombay Presidency. New Delhi: Navrang.Google Scholar
“Convict Labour in Jails.” 1886. Native Opinion 23(27):5.Google Scholar
de Forest, Lockwood. 1919. “Indian Domestic Architecture.” Unpublished book manuscript.Google Scholar
Durai, j. Chinna. 1929. “Indian Prisons.” Journal of Comparative Legislation and International Law 11:245–49.Google Scholar
Dutt, Romesh C. 1906. The Economic History of India in the Victorian Age. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.Google Scholar
Dutta, Arindam. 2006. The Bureaucracy of Beauty: Design in the Age of Its Global Reproducibility. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandes, G. P. 1932. Report on the Art-Crafts of the Bombay Presidency. Bombay: Government Central Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1979. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Government of Bombay. 1882. Gazetteer of the Bombay Presidency: Vol. VIII, Part I: Thana. Bombay: Government Central Press.Google Scholar
“Government Resolution on Jail Manufacture.” 1882. Native Opinion 19(42):2–3.Google Scholar
Guha-Thakurta, Tapati. 1992. The Making of a New “Indian” Art: Artists, Aesthetics and Nationalism in Bengal 1850–1920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hazen, William. 1913. A Century in India: A Historical Sketch of the Marathi Mission of the American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions. Bombay: American Marathi Mission.Google Scholar
Hendley, Thomas Holbein. 1884. Memorials of the Jeypore Exhibition, 1883: Vol. I–IV. London: W. Griggs.Google Scholar
Hendley, Thomas Holbein. 1905. Asian Carpets: XVI and XVII Century Designs from the Jaipur Palaces from Material Supplied with Permission of the Maharaja of Jaipur and Other Sources. London: W. Griggs.Google Scholar
Hoffenberg, Peter H. 2001. An Empire on Display: English, Indian and Australian Exhibitions from the Crystal Palace to the Great War. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Indian Industrial Commission. 1918. Report. Calcutta: Government Printing.Google Scholar
Indian Industrial Commission. 1919. Minutes of Evidence Taken Before the Indian Industrial Commission, 1916–1918: Vol. IV. Bombay. London: His Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Indian Jails Committee. 1920. Report of the Indian Jails Committee: Volume I: Report and Appendices. Simla: Superintendent, Government Printing.Google Scholar
Indian Jails Committee. 1922. Report of the Indian Jails Committee: Volume IV, Minutes of Evidence Taken in Bihar and Orissa, the Central Provinces, and the Bombay Presidency. Calcutta: Superintendent, Government Printing.Google Scholar
Lal, Vinay. 1999. “Everyday Crime, Native Mendacity and the Cultural Psychology of Justice in Colonial India.” Studies in History, n.s., 15(1):145–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Latimer, C. 1916. “Carpet Making in the Punjab.” Journal of Indian Art and Industry 17(131):15–26.Google Scholar
Mathur, Saloni. 2007. India by Design: Colonial History and Cultural Display. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGowan, Abigail. 2008. “Educating Artisans as Colonial Modernity: Industrial Education in Late Nineteenth Century Western India.” In Claiming Power from Below: Dalits and the Subaltern Question in India, eds. Bhagvan, Manu and Feldhaus, Anne, 84–100. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McGowan, Abigail. 2009. Crafting the Nation in Colonial India. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehta, Shirin. 1981. “Social Background of Swadeshi Movement in Gujarat, 1875–1908.” Vidya 14(1):31–46.Google Scholar
Metcalf, Thomas. 1989. An Imperial Vision: Indian Architecture and Britain's Raj. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Metcalf, Thomas. 1995. Ideologies of the Raj. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, James H. 2000. Madness, Cannabis and Colonialism: The “Native Only” Lunatic Asylums of British India, 1857–1900. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouat, F. J. 1891. “On Prison Ethics and Prison Labour.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 54(2):213–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukharji, T. N. 1888. Art-Manufactures of India. Calcutta: Superintendent of Government Printing.Google Scholar
Naoroji, Dadabhai. 1901. Poverty and Un-British Rule in India. London: S. Sonnenschein.Google Scholar
Pandian, Ananda. 2009. Crooked Stalks: Cultivating Virtue in South India. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Proceedings of the Art Conference Held in the Technical Institute at Lahore on the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th January 1894. Calcutta: Government Central Printing Office.Google Scholar
Ranade, Mahadev Govind. 1906. Essays on Indian Economics: A Collection of Essays and Speeches. Madras: G. A. Natesan & Co.Google Scholar
Rao, Anupama, and Pierce, Steven. 2006. “Discipline and the Other Body: Humanitarianism, Violence and the Colonial Exception.” In Discipline and the Other Body: Correction, Corporeality, Colonialism, eds. Rao, Anupama and Pierce, Steven, 1–35. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Roy, Tirthankar. 1999. Traditional Industry in the Economy of Colonial India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, Satadru. 2000. Disciplining Punishment: Colonialism and Convict Society in the Andaman Islands. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, Satadru. 2004. “A Separate Punishment: Juvenile Offenders in Colonial India.” Journal of Asian Studies 63(1):81–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singha, Radhika. 1998. A Despotism of Law: Crime and Justice in Early Colonial India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Solomon, W. E. G. 1924. The Bombay Revival of Indian Art. Bombay: W.E.G. Solomon, Sir JJ School of Art.Google Scholar
Swaminathan, Padmini. 1995. “Prison as Factory: A Study of Jail Manufactures in the Madras Presidency.” Studies in History, n.s., 11(1):77–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolen, Rachel. 1991. “Colonizing and Transforming the Criminal Tribesman: The Salvation Army in British India.” American Ethnologist 18(1):106–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twigg, H. J. R. [1907] 1976. A Monograph on the Art and Practice of Carpet-Making in the Bombay Presidency. Art in Industry Through the Ages: Monograph Series on the Bombay Presidency. New Delhi: Navrang.Google Scholar
“The Viceroy on the Delhi Arts Exhibition.” 1903. Indian Review 4(1):50–51.Google Scholar
Walker, Daniel S. 1997. Flowers Underfoot: Indian Carpets of the Mughal Era. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art.Google Scholar
Watt, George. 1903. Indian Art at Delhi: Being the Official Catalogue of the Delhi Exhibition, 1902–1903. Calcutta: Superintendent of Government Printing.Google Scholar
Yang, Anand. 1987. “Disciplining ‘Natives’: Prisons and Prisoners in Early Nineteenth Century India.” South Asia 10(2):29–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar