Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T00:21:13.190Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The demographic effect of socioeconomic development in guam

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Shui-Liang Tung
Shui-Liang Tung
Affiliation:
Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Guam has experienced a dramatic socioeconomic development since the end of World War II, accompanied by one of the most rapid fertility declines on record. Although Guam has a very low mortality, comparable to that of the United States, its fertility is higher than in most countries with the same income level. It is suggested that the current high fertility results from the pro-natalist pressures associated with Roman Catholicism. The emigration of residents has been completely offset by immigration from the Orient and, to a lesser extent, the United States. Rural-to-urban migration, mainly from the south to the north, did not start until the late 1950s. Since the end of World War II, the military and alien population has accounted for approximately 40% of the total population and has had substantial demographic, political, and socioeconomic effects.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , July 1982 , pp. 295 - 307
Copyright
Copyright © 1982, Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carano, P. (1951) The old order changeth. Guam Examiner, 10, 11.Google Scholar
Carano, P. & Sanchez, P.C. (1964) A Complete History of Guam. Tuttle, Tokyo.Google Scholar
Concepcion, M.B. & Smith, P.C. (1977) The Demographic Situation in the Philippines: An Assessment in 1977. Paper No. 44, East–West Population Institute, Honolulu.Google Scholar
Cho, L.J. & Retherford, R.D. (1973) Comparative analysis of recent fertility trends in East Asia. In: International Conference Proceedings, Vol. 2, p. 163. International Union for the Scientific Study of Population, Liege, Belgium.Google Scholar
Gardner, R.W. & Nordyke, E.C. (1974) The Demographic Situation in Hawaii. Paper No. 31, East–West Population Institute, Honolulu.Google Scholar
Guam Department of Commerce (1980a) Annual Economic Review. Agana, Guam.Google Scholar
Guam Department of Commerce (1980b) Quarterly Economic Review, Nos 1–4. Agana, Guam.Google Scholar
Guam Department of Public Health and Social Services (1961–78) Annual Report. Agana, Guam.Google Scholar
Palmore, J.A. (1978) Regression Estimates of Changes in Fertility, 1955–60 to 1965–75, for most Major Nations and Territories. Paper No. 58, East–West Population Institute, Honolulu.Google Scholar
Population Reference Bureau (1981) World Population Data Sheet. PRB, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
US Bureau of the Census (1922) Fourteenth Census of the United States:1920, Vol. 3, Population Composition and Characteristics of the Population by States. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
US Bureau of the Census (1961) US Census of Population: 1960, General Population Characteristics, Guam. Final Report, PC (1)–54B. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
US Bureau of the Census (1972) US Census of Population: 1970, General Population Characteristics, Guam. Final Report PC (1)–B54. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
US Bureau of the Census (1980a) Statistical Abstract of the United States: 1979, p. 72Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
US Bureau of the Census (1980b) World Population 1979—Recent Demographic Estimates for the Countries and Regions of the World. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Wolff, R.J., Bell, B.Z. & Desanna, R. (1970) A Study of Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Relative to Family Planning among Indigenous Women in Guam, 1969. School of Public Health, University of Hawaii, Honolulu.Google Scholar