Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-04T13:20:51.361Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Enterocin HZ produced by a wild Enterococcus faecium strain isolated from a traditional, starter-free pickled cheese

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2014

Zeliha Yildirim*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Engineering, Department of Food Engineering, Nigde University, Nigde, Turkey
Harun Bilgin
Affiliation:
Faculty of Engineering, Department of Food Engineering, Nigde University, Nigde, Turkey
Hilal Isleroglu
Affiliation:
Faculty of Engineering, Department of Food Engineering, Nigde University, Nigde, Turkey
Kader Tokatli
Affiliation:
Faculty of Engineering, Department of Food Engineering, Nigde University, Nigde, Turkey
Didem Sahingil
Affiliation:
Faculty of Engineering, Department of Food Engineering, Nigde University, Nigde, Turkey
Metin Yildirim
Affiliation:
Faculty of Engineering, Department of Food Engineering, Nigde University, Nigde, Turkey
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: zeliha.yildirim@nigde.edu.tr

Abstract

Bacteriogenic Enterococcus faecium HZ was identified by using biochemical (Strep-API 20, API-50 CHL, fatty acid profile) and 16S rRNA analysis (99·99 %). Ent. faecium HZ was sensitive to clinically important antibiotics such as vancomycin, and did not have gelatinase and haemolysis activities. Enterocin HZ, a bacteriocin from Ent. faecium HZ, was sensitive to papain and tyripsin, but resistant to pepsin, lipase, catalase, α-amylase, organic solvents, detergents, ß-mercaptoethanol, and heat treatment (90 °C/30 min). It was biologically active at pH 2·0–9·0 and synthesised at the highest level in MRS or M17 broth at 32 or 37 °C with an inoculum amount of 0·1–0·5 % and an initial pH of 6·0–7·0. Enterocin HZ production reached maximum level at middle and late logarithmic phase and its molecular weight was ∼4·5 kDa. It was active against some Gram-positive foodborne bacteria. Ent. faecium HZ or its bacteriocin enterocin HZ is a good candidate to be studied as a food biopreservative since enterocin HZ showed strong bactericidal activity against Listeria monocytogenes in UHT milk and also Ent. faecium HZ grew very well in milk and produced enterocin HZ at maximum level.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aasen, I, Moretro, T, Katla, T, Axelson, L & Storro, I 2000 Influence of complex nutrients, temperature and pH on bacteriocin production by Lactobacillus sakei CCUG 42687. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 53 159166Google Scholar
Achemchem, F, Martinez-Bueno, M, Abrini, J, Valdivia, E & Maqueda, M 2005 Enterococcus faecium F58, a bacteriocinogenic strain naturally occurring in Jben, a soft, farmhouse goat's cheese made in Morocco. Journal of Applied Microbiology 99 141150CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ahmadova, A, Todorov, SD, Choiset, Y, Rabesona, H, Zadi, TM, Kuliyev, A, de Melo Franco, BDG, Chobert, JM & Haertlé, T 2013 Evaluation of antimicrobial activity, probiotic properties and safety of wild strain Enterococcus faecium AQ71 isolated from Azerbaijani Motal cheese. Food Control 30 631641Google Scholar
Bal, EBB, Isevi, T & Bal, MA 2012 Characterization of an anti-listerial enterocin from wheat silage based Enterococcus faecium. Journal of Basic Microbiology 52 496503Google Scholar
Barbosa, J, Ferreira, V & Teixeira, P 2009 Antibiotic susceptibility of enterococci isolated from traditional fermented meat products. Food Microbiology 26 527532Google Scholar
Bhatti, M, Veeramachaneni, A & Shelef, LA 2004 Factors affecting the antilisterial effects of nisin in milk. International Journal of Food Microbiology 97 215219CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bellei, B, Miguel, M, Mere Del Aguila, EM, Silva, JT & Paschoalin, VMF 2011 Purification of a bacteriocin produced by Enterococcus faecium and its effectiveness for preservation of fresh-cut lettuce. Journal of Microbiology and Antimicrobials 3 119125Google Scholar
Cariolato, D, Andrighetto, C & Lombardi, A 2008 Occurrence of virulence factors and antibiotic resistances in Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium collected from dairy and human samples in North Italy. Food Control 19 886892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, YS, Yanagida, F & Srionnual, S 2007 Characteristics of bacteriocin-like inhibitory substances from dochi-isolated Enterococcus faecium D081821 and D081833. Letters in Applied Microbiology 44 320325Google Scholar
CLSI M100-S21 2011 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing 21th Informational Supplement. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards InstituteGoogle Scholar
Du Toit, M, Franz, CMAP, Dicks, LMT & Holzapfel, WH 2000 Preliminary characterization of bacteriocins produced by Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis isolated from pig faeces. Journal of Applied Microbiology 88 482494CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gálvez, A, Abriouel, H, López, RL & Ben Omar, N 2007 Bacteriocin-based strategies for food biopreservation. International Journal of Food Microbiology 120 5170Google Scholar
Ghrairi, T, Frere, J, Berjeaud, JM & Manai, M 2008 Purification and characterisation of bacteriocin produced by Enterococcus faecium from Tunisian rigouta cheese. Food Control 19 162169Google Scholar
Giraffa, G 2003 Functionality of enterococci in dairy products. International Journal of Food Microbiology 88 215–22Google Scholar
Hayaloglu, AA, Guven, M & Fox, PF 2002 Microbiological, biochemical and technological properties of Turkish White cheese ‘Beyaz Peynir’. International Dairy Journal 12 635648Google Scholar
Herranz, C, Casaus, P, Mukhopadhyay, S, Martinez, JM, Rodriguez, JM, Nes, IF, Hernandez, PE & Cintas, LM 2001 Enterococcus faecium P21: a strain occurring naturally in dry-fermented sausages producing the class II bacteriocins enterocin A and enterocin B. Food Microbiology 18 115131Google Scholar
Isleroglu, H, Yildirim, Z, Tokatlı, M, Öncül, N & Yildirim, M 2012 Partial characterisation of enterocin KP produced by Enterococcus faecalis KP, a cheese isolate. International Journal of Dairy Technology 65 9097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayser, FH 2003 Safety aspects of Enterococci from the medical point of view. International Journal of Food Microbiology 88 255262Google Scholar
Kumar, M & Srivastava, S 2010 Antilisterial activity of a broad-spectrum bacteriocin, enterocin LR/6 from Enterococcus faecium LR/6. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 162 698706Google Scholar
Leroy, F, Foulquié Moreno, MR & De Vuyst, L 2003 Enterococcus faecium RZS C5, an interesting bacteriocin producer to be used as a co-culture in food fermentation. International Journal of Food Microbiology 88 235240Google Scholar
Losteinkit, C, Uchiyama, K, Ochi, S, Takaoka, T, Nagahisa, K & Shioya, S 2001 Characterization of bacteriocin N15 produced by Enterococcus faecium N15 and cloning of the related genes. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering 91 390395CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayr-Harting, A, Hedges, AJ & Berkley, RW 1972 Methods for studying bacteriocins. In Methods in Microbiology, Vol. 7A, pp. 315442 (Eds Noris, JR, &Ribbons, NW). London: Academic Press Inc.Google Scholar
Moreno, MRF, Leisner, JJ, Tee, LK, Ley, C, Radu, S, Rusul, G, Vancanneyt, M & De Vuyst, L 2002 Microbial analysis of Malaysian tempeh, and characterization of two bacteriocins produced by isolates of Enterococcus faecium. Journal of Applied Microbiology 92 147157Google Scholar
Moreno, MRF, Rea, MC, Cogan, TM & De Vuyst, L 2003 Applicability of bacteriocin-producing Enterococcus faecium as a co-culture in Cheddar cheese manufacture. International Journal of Food Microbiology 81 7384Google Scholar
Nes, IF, Marekova, M, Laukova, A, de Vuyst, L & Skaugen, M 2003 Partial characterization of bacteriocins produced by environmental strain Enterococcus faecium EK13. Journal of Applied Microbiology 94 52530Google Scholar
Ohmomo, S, Murata, S, Katayama, N, Nitisinprasart, S, Kobayashi, M, Nakajima, T, Yajima, M & Nakanishi, K 2000 Purification and some characteristics of enterocin ON-157, a bacteriocin produced by Enterococcus faecium NIAI 157. Journal of Applied Microbiology 88 8189Google Scholar
Rehaiem, A, Martinez, B, Manai, M & Rodriguez, A 2010 Production of enterocin A by Enterococcus faecium MMRA isolated from ‘Rayeb’, a traditional Tunisian dairy beverage. Journal of Applied Microbiology 108 16851693Google Scholar
Reviriego, C, Eaton, T, Martin, R, Jimenez, E, Fernandez, L & Rodriguez, JM 2005 Screening of virulence determinants in Enterococcus faecium strains isolated from breast milk. Journal of Human Lactation 21 131137Google Scholar
Sahingil, D, Isleroglu, H, Yildirim, Z, Akçelik, M & Yildirim, M 2011 Characterization of lactococcin BZ produced by Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis BZ isolated from Boza. Turkish Journal of Biology 35 2133Google Scholar
Sanger, F, Nicklen, S & Coulson, AR 1977 DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America 74 54635467Google Scholar
Sarantinopoulos, P, Andrighetto, C, Georgalaki, MD, Rea, MC, Lombardi, A, Cogan, TM, Kalantzopoulos, G & Tsakalidou, E 2001 Biochemical properties of enterococci relevant to their technological performance. International Dairy Journal 11 621647Google Scholar
Schägger, H & Jagov, GV 1987 Tricine-sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for the separation of proteins in the range from 1 to 100 kDa. Analytical Biochemistry 166 368379Google Scholar
Stiles, ME 1996 Biopreservation by lactic acid bacteria. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 70 331345Google Scholar
Vu, J & Carvalho, J 2011 Enterococcus: review of its physiology, pathogenesis, diseases and the challenges it poses for clinical microbiology. Frontiers in Biology 6 357366Google Scholar
Yang, R, Johnson, MC & Ray, B 1992 Novel method to extract large amounts of bacteriocins from lactic acid bacteria. Journal of Applied and Environmental Microbiology 58 33553359.Google Scholar