Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-r7xzm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T06:47:39.280Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The occurrence of Dirofilaria immitis, Borrelia burgdorferi, Ehrlichia canis and Anaplasma phagocytophium in dogs in China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2011

Z. Xia*
Affiliation:
Internal Medicine Laboratory, Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
D. Yu
Affiliation:
Internal Medicine Laboratory, Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
J. Mao
Affiliation:
Shanghai Family Pet Hospital, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
Z. Zhang
Affiliation:
Beijing Aikang Pet Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China
J. Yu
Affiliation:
Animal Department, Beijing Aquarium, Beijing, People's Republic of China
*
*Fax: +86 −010-62732804 E-mail: drxia@126.com

Abstract

A survey of the occurrence of Dirofilaria immitis, Borrelia burgdorferi, Ehrlichia canis and Anaplasma phagocytophium in dogs was undertaken in the People's Republic of China between October 2008 and October 2009. A total of 600 blood samples were taken from dogs in four cities in China: 300 in Beijing, 150 in Shenzhen, 30 in Shanghai and 120 in Zhengzhou. All samples were tested for the heartworm antigen and antibodies of canine B. burgdorferi, E. canis and A. phagocytophium by using the canine SNAP® 4Dx® test kit. The occurrence of D. immitis, B. burgdorferi, E. canis and A. phagocytophium was 1.17% (7/600), 0.17% (1/600), 2.17% (13/600) and 0.5% (3/600), respectively. In Shenzhen city 2% (3/150), 8.67% (13/150) and 2% (3/150) of samples were positive for D. immitis, E. canis and A. phagocytophium, respectively. The occurrence of heartworm antigen was 0.33% (1/300) in Beijing, 2.00% (3/150) in Shenzhen, 3.33% (1/30) in Shanghai and 1.67% (2/120) in Zhengzhou. We found E. canis and A. phagocytophium only at one site, Shenzhen, while the only occurrence of B. burgdorferi was at Beijing. In conclusion, the dog population in China is at potential risk for D. immitis, B. burgdorferi, E. canis and A. phagocytophium infection, the risk being especially high in southern China.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amusategui, I., Tesouro, M.A., Kakoma, I. & Sainz, A. (2008) Serological reactivity to Ehrlichia canis, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Neorickettsia risticii, Borrelia burgdorferi and Rickettsia conorii in dogs from northwestern Spain. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases 8, 797803.Google Scholar
Andrews, M.N. (1937) Hyper-infection of dogs with the microfilariae of Dirofilaria immitis. Journal of Helminthology 15, 167168.Google Scholar
Beall, M.J., Chandrashekar, R., Eberts, M.D., Cyr, K.E., Diniz, P.P., Mainville, C., Hegarty, B.C., Crawford, J.M. & Breitschwerdt, E.B. (2008) Serological and molecular prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, and Ehrlichia species in dogs from Minnesota. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases 8, 455464.Google Scholar
Beugnet, F. & Marie, J.L. (2009) Emerging arthropod-borne diseases of companion animals in Europe. Veterinary Parasitology 163, 298305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhide, M., Yilmaz, Z., Golcu, E., Torun, S. & Mikula, I. (2008) Seroprevalence of anti-Borrelia burgdorferi antibodies in dogs and horses in Turkey. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine 15, 8590.Google ScholarPubMed
Bowman, D., Little, S.E., Lorentzen, L., Shields, J., Sullivan, M.P. & Carlin, E.P. (2009) Prevalence and geographic distribution of Dirofilaria immitis, Borrelia burgdorferi, Ehrlichia canis, and Anaplasma phagocytophilum in dogs in the United States: results of a national clinic-based serologic survey. Veterinary Parasitology 160, 138148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costa, L.M. Jr, Rembeck, K., Ribeiro, M.F., Beelitz, P., Pfister, K. & Passos, L.M. (2007) Sero-prevalence and risk indicators for canine ehrlichiosis in three rural areas of Brazil. Veterinary Journal 174, 673676.Google Scholar
de Caprariis, D., Sasanelli, M., Paradies, P., Otranto, D. & Lia, R. (2009) Monoclonal gammopathy associated with heartworm disease in a dog. Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association 45, 296300.Google Scholar
Ebani, V., Cerri, D., Fratini, F., Ampola, M. & Andreani, E. (2008) Seroprevalence of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in domestic and wild animals from central Italy. New Microbiologica 31, 371375.Google ScholarPubMed
Egenvall, A., Bonnett, B.N., Gunnarsson, A., Hedhammar, A., Shoukri, M., Bornstein, S. & Artursson, K. (2000) Sero-prevalence of granulocytic Ehrlichia spp. and Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in Swedish dogs 1991–94. Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases 32, 1925.Google ScholarPubMed
Genchi, C., Rinaldi, L., Mortarino, M., Genchi, M. & Cringoli, G. (2009) Climate and Dirofilaria infection in Europe. Veterinary Parasitology 163, 286292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gothe, R. (1998) Ehrlichia canis infections of dogs in Germany. Epidemiology, diagnosis, therapy and prophylaxis. Tierarztliche Praxis Ausgabe Klientiere Heimtiere 26, 396401.Google Scholar
Hua, P., Yuhai, M., Shide, T., Yang, S., Bohai, W. & Xiangrui, C. (2000) Canine ehrlichiosis caused simultaneously by Ehrlichia canis and Ehrlichia platys. Microbiology and Immunology 44, 737739.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levi, O., Waner, T., Baneth, G., Keysary, A., Bruchim, Y., Silverman, J. & Harrus, S. (2006) Seroprevalence of Anaplasma phagocytophilum among healthy dogs and horses in Israel. Journal of Veterinary Medicine. B, Infectious Diseases and Veterinary Public Health 53, 7880.Google Scholar
Lorentzen, L. & Caola, A.E. (2008) Incidence of positive heartworm antibody and antigen tests at IDEXX Laboratories: trends and potential impact on feline heartworm awareness and prevention. Veterinary Parasitology 158, 183190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
M'Ghirbi, Y., Ghorbel, A., Amouri, M., Nebaoui, A., Haddad, S. & Bouattour, A. (2009) Clinical, serological, and molecular evidence of ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis in dogs in Tunisia. Parasitology Research 104, 767774.Google Scholar
Miterpakova, M., Antolova, D., Hurnikova, Z., Dubinsky, P., Pavlacka, A. & Nemeth, J. (2010) Dirofilaria infections in working dogs in Slovakia. Journal of Helminthology 84, 173176.Google Scholar
Montoya, J.A., Morales, M., Ferrer, O., Molina, J.M. & Corbera, J.A. (1998) The prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis in Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain (1994–1996). Veterinary Parasitology 75, 221226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morshed, M.G., Scott, J.D., Fernando, K., Geddes, G., McNabb, A., Mak, S. & Durden, L.A. (2006) Distribution and characterization of Borrelia burgdorferi isolates from Ixodes scapularis and presence in mammalian hosts in Ontario, Canada. Journal of Medical Entomology 43, 762773.Google Scholar
Mortarino, M., Musella, V., Costa, V., Genchi, C., Cringoli, G. & Rinaldi, L. (2008) GIS modeling for canine dirofilariosis risk assessment in central Italy. Geospatial Health 2, 253261.Google Scholar
Pantchev, N., Norden, N., Lorentzen, L., Rossi, M., Rossi, U., Brand, B. & Dyachenko, V. (2009a) Current surveys on the prevalence and distribution of Dirofilaria spp. in dogs in Germany. Parasitology Research 105 (Suppl. 1), S63S74.Google Scholar
Pantchev, N., Schaper, R., Limousin, S., Norden, N., Weise, M. & Lorentzen, L. (2009b) Occurrence of Dirofilaria immitis and tick-borne infections caused by Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato and Ehrlichia canis in domestic dogs in France: results of a countrywide serologic survey. Parasitology Research 105 (Suppl. 1), S101S114.Google Scholar
Pejchalova, K., Zakovska, A., Fucik, K. & Schanilec, P. (2006) Serological confirmation of Borrelia burgdorferi infection in dogs in the Czech Republic. Veterinary Research Communications 30, 231238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skotarczak, B. (2003) Canine ehrlichiosis. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine 10, 137141.Google ScholarPubMed
Tabar, M.D., Francino, O., Altet, L., Sanchez, A., Ferrer, L. & Roura, X. (2009) PCR survey of vectorborne pathogens in dogs living in and around Barcelona, an area endemic for leishmaniasis. Veterinary Record 164, 112116.Google Scholar
Trapp, S.M., Dagnone, A.S., Vidotto, O., Freire, R.L., Amude, A.M. & de Morais, H.S. (2006) Seroepidemiology of canine babesiosis and ehrlichiosis in a hospital population. Veterinary Parasitology 140, 223230.Google Scholar
Wen, B., Cao, W. & Pan, H. (2003) Ehrlichiae and ehrlichial diseases in China. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 990, 4553.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yaman, M., Guzel, M., Koltas, I.S., Demirkazik, M. & Aktas, H. (2009) Prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis in dogs from Hatay province, Turkey. Journal of Helminthology 83, 255260.Google Scholar
Yildirim, A., Ica, A., Atalay, O., Duzlu, O. & Inci, A. (2007) Prevalence and epidemiological aspects of Dirofilaria immitis in dogs from Kayseri Province, Turkey. Research in Veterinary Science 82, 358363.Google Scholar