Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-15T09:48:54.767Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Malcolm and Smart on Brain-Mind Identity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2009

Robert Hoffman
Affiliation:
New york University.

Extract

In ‘Scientific Materialism and the Identity Theory’ Malcolm argues that Smart's brain-mind identity theory is not even false, but is unintelligible. I want to comment on his arguments.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 128 note 1 Malcolm, Norman, ‘Scientific Materialism and the Identity Theory’, Dialogue, III, 2 (1964), pp. 115125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 128 note 2 Smart, J. J. C., ‘Materialism’, The Journal of Philosophy, LX, 22 (1963), pp. 651662CrossRefGoogle Scholar and ‘Sensations and Brain Processes’, The Philosophical Review, LXVIII, 2 (1959), pp. 141–156.

page 129 note 1 In Schilpp, Paul Arthur, ed., Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, 2nd edit. (New York: Tudor Publishing Company, 1951), pp. 31, 33.Google Scholar

page 129 note 2 Hampshire, Stuart, ‘The Interpretation of Language: Words and Concepts’, in Mace, C. A., ed., British Philosophy in the Mid-Century, 1957, p. 275.Google Scholar

page 130 note 1 Moore, George Edward, Some Main Problems of Philosophy, 1953, p. 1.Google Scholar

page 130 note 2 Russell, Bertrand, ‘On Scientific Method in Philosophy’, reprinted in Mysticism and Logic, 1917, pp. 97124.Google Scholar

page 131 note 1 Lashley, K. S., ‘In search of the Engram’, Symposia of the Society of Experimental Biology, 4: 454482 (1950).Google Scholar

page 135 note 1 Smart, J. J. C., ‘Sensations and Brain Processes’, p. 150.Google Scholar

page 136 note 1 ‘Experience’ is a syncategorematic expression in this context, so no question of where ‘the experience’ is, etc., arises.