Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T02:41:12.766Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Note on Doubts About Prima Facie Duties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2009

Henry Jack
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy , Volume 46 , Issue 176 , April 1971 , pp. 160 - 161
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Jones, Peter, ‘Doubts About Prima Facie Duties’, Philosophy, XLV, January 1970, pp. 39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 These points are discussed in some detail in my paper ‘Utilitarianism and Ross's Theory of Prima Facie Duties’, forthcoming in Dialogue.

3 The clearest statement of this is in Ross's summary of his system given in Chapter XIII of Foundations of Ethics (London, 1939). See pp. 312–3.

4 The Right and the Good (London, 1930), p. 31, my italics.