Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T01:02:26.284Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Great Thinkers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2009

Extract

There is a belief among the aborigines of Central Australia that the attributes of the divine ancestor are parcelled out among the component members of the tribe: and there are long periods in the history of ideas in which “divine philosophy” is similarly dismembered. The reason is that all great philosophical systems rest on a balanced tension of contemporary cultural elements, and as these change, and especially if they change rapidly or decisively, the unity of thought under which they have been gathered begins to disintegrate. There follows a period of piecemeal experiment, in which the material of philosophy is too rich and too disorganized to be appropriated in a single conspectus: a period in which there will be no great philosophers, and perhaps little conscious philosophizing, not because philosophic genius is lacking, but because there is no scope for it till the various special tendencies of the age have achieved a certain internal development and a definite sense of direction.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1935

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Page 432 Note 1 For the development of this point, see C. R. Morris, Idealistic Logic, ch. iv.

Page 432 Note 2 See my Philosophy of Descartes, p. 161, note.

Page 435 Note 1 This point is treated more fully in The Philosophy of Descartes, p, 321, from which these passages are quoted.

Page 437 Note 1 Studies in Contemporary Metaphysics, p. 241.