Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T20:15:53.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analogy Reviewed

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2009

Patrick J. Sherry
Patrick J. Sherry
Affiliation:
University of Lancaster
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy , Volume 51 , Issue 197 , July 1976 , pp. 337 - 345
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Palmer, Humphrey, Analogy (Macmillan, London, 1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Burrell, David, Analogy and Philosophical Language (Yale University Press, New Haven London, 1973)Google Scholar.

2 La doctrine de I'analogie de l'être d'après Saint Thomas d'Aquin (Louvain, 1963), p. 47Google Scholar.

3 Fr Bochenski has drawn attention to the fact that the term ‘systematic ambiguity’, coined by Russell and Whitehead, is an exact translation of the mediaeval aequivocatio a consilio: see ‘On Analogy’, in Menne, A. (ed.), Logico- Philosophical Studies (Dordrecht, 1962), p. 104CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 ‘An Irrelevance of Omnipotence’, Philosophy, 48 (186), Oct. 1973, 333Google Scholar.