Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T19:30:08.550Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Need for Ontology: Some Choices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

C. B. Martin
C. B. Martin
Affiliation:
University of Calgary
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The aim of this paper is to set out some of the ontologies amongst which some forms of anti-realism must select. This provides the appropriate setting for presenting an alternative realist ontology. The argument is that the choice between the varieties of anti-realism and realism is inevitably a choice between ontologies.

Type
Articles
Information
Philosophy , Volume 68 , Issue 266 , October 1993 , pp. 505 - 522
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Davidson, Donald, ‘A Coherence Theory of Truth and Knowledge’ in Kant oder Hegel? Henrich, Dieter (ed.), (Stuttgart, Germany: Klett-Cotta, 1983), 425.Google Scholar Davidson's more recent qualified agreements with some of Rorty's views, do not seem to me to dilute Davidson's realism.

2 Ibid., 425.

3 Davidson, Donald, ‘On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Association in Atlanta (12 1973), 20.Google Scholar

4 Davidson, Donald, ‘A Coherence Theory of Truth and Knowledge’, 437.Google Scholar

5 Ibid., 424.

6 Ibid., 424.

7 Ibid., 423.

8 Ibid., 431.

9 Ibid., 437.

10 Ibid., 424.

11 Ibid., 423.

12 Putnam, Hilary, Realism and Reason (Cambridge University Press, 1983), 44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13 Ibid., 218.

14 Ibid., 44–45.

15 Ibid., 226.

16 Ibid., 1–25 and 295–296.

17 Myhill, John, ‘On the Ontological Significance of the Löwenheim-Skolem Theory’ in Academic Freedom, Logic and Religion White, M. (ed.), (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1951), 57–70.Google Scholar

18 Martin, C. B., ‘The New Cartesianism’ Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 65 (1983), 239.Google Scholar

19 Martin, C. B., ‘Anti-Realism and the World's Undoing’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 65 (1984), 18–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

20 Martin, C. B., ‘Substance Substantiated’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy (03 1980), 9–10.Google Scholar