Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T22:52:41.562Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bad Faith

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

Michael Hymers
Michael Hymers
Affiliation:
Dalhousie University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy , Volume 64 , Issue 249 , July 1989 , pp. 397 - 402
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Stevenson, Leslie, ‘Sartre on Bad Faith’, Philosophy 58 (1983), 253–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Op. cit. 258.

3 Gordon, Jeffrey, ‘Bad Faith: A Dilemma’, Philosophy 60 (1985), 258–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 See op. cit. note 1, 253f.

5 All page references in the text are to Sartre, J.-P., Being and Nothingness, translated by Barnes, Hazel (New York: Washington Square Press, 1966).Google Scholar

6 Op. cit. note 3, 261.

7 Op. cit. note 1, 256f.

8 Op. cit. note 1, 256.

9 Op. cit. note 3, 261.

10 This is similar to a criticism which Sartre makes of the Freudian censor. See pp. 92ff.

11 I am indebted to Steven Burns and Nathan Brett for their helpful comments.