Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-fqc5m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T09:28:46.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Representation in Music and Painting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

Jenefer Robinson
Affiliation:
University of Cincinnati

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Scruton, Roger, ‘Representation in Music’, Philosophy 51 (1976), 273287CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Scruton, 281.

3 Scruton, 276.

4 Scruton, 285.

5 Walsh, Stephen, The Lieder of Schumann (Cassell, 1971), 44Google Scholar.

6 Scruton, 282.

7 Scruton's paper has recently been criticized by Richard Kuhns, but I find Kuhns' objections entirely unconvincing. Most of his criticisms rely on the claim that music is a representational art in virtue of the fact that sections of a piece of music refer to other sections. For example, the first statement of a theme in a symphony refers to the second statement of that theme. Such a view makes nonsense of the distinction between representational and non-representational art. If we accept this condition on ‘representational art’—and there is every reason to suppose that Scruton would not accept it—then any well-organized work of art will count as ‘representational’. Any abstract painting, for example, will contain parts that ‘refer’ to other parts in this loose and misleading sense of ‘refers’. More specifically, Kuhns claims that in order to understand a ‘crab canon’, one must be able to hear the ‘self-reference’ in the music. But Scruton would not deny that one must be able to hear how the music is organized. However, he might well disagree that one has to hear it as representing a crab, as Kuhns seems to assume. See Kuhns, Richard, ‘Music as a Representational Art’, British Journal of Aesthetics 18 (1978), 120125CrossRefGoogle Scholar.