No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Anselm, Truth, and Necessary Being
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 February 2009
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Discussion
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1962
References
page 257 note 1 Yolton, J. W., ‘Professor Malcolm on St Anselm, Belief, and Existence’, Philosophy, Vol. 36, 1961, pp. 367–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar;Malcolm, N., ‘Anselm's Ontological Arguments’, Philosophhical Review, Vol. 69, 1960, pp. 41–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Alston, W. P., ‘The Ontological Argument Revisited’, Philosophical Review, Vol. 69, 1960, pp. 452–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 257 note 2 The quote is from McKeon's translation: R. McKeon, Selections From Medieval Philosophers, Vol. I, New York, 1929, pp. 153, 154. Anselm's Dialogous de Veritate is in J . P. Migne, Patrologiae Cursus Completes, Series Latina, Vol. 158, cols. 467–486.
page 257 note 3 McKeon, op. cit., pp. 142–149. E. Gilson, ‘Sens et Nature de l'Argument de Saint Anselm’, Archives d'Histoire Doctrinale et Litteraire du Moyen Age, Neuvième Année, 1934, pp. 5–51, n.b. p. 10.
page 257 note 4 Gilson, op. cit., p. 15.
page 257 note 5 Yolton, op. cit., pp. 369–370.
page 258 note 1 Malcolm, op. cit., pp. 42, 50, 52.
page 258 note 2 Ibid., p. 45; cf. Anselm, Proslogion 2, 3.
page 258 note 3 My debt to Prof. J. R. Weinberg of the University of Wisconsin, who first pointed out to me the importance of Anselm's view of truth and directed me to Gilson's essay, must be acknowledged. He is not, of course, responsible for any errors in this note.