We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 October 2008
My argument will be that our understanding of human beings, which is what I take the Christian doctrine of man to be concerned with, will benefit considerably from an examination of two different but related clusters of human attitudes which can be found respectively under the headings ‘optimism’ and ‘pessimism’. There are many pitfalls in the way of such an enterprise, and occasionally some prejudices to be overcome. For example L. E. Loemker in the relevant articles in the Encyclopedia of Philosophy concludes a fairly lengthy discussion with the rather terminal judgement:
page 537 note 1 Marcel, G., Homo Viator (Gollacz, 1951), p. 34.Google Scholar
page 539 note 1 Cf. ‘What Happens After Death?’ Scot. Journ. Theol. (1969)Google Scholar; ‘Immortality and Resurrection’, in Donnelly, J. (ed.), Language, Metaphysics and Death (Fordham U.P., 1978).Google Scholar
page 542 note 1 Cf. Zahn, Gordon, In Solitary Witness (Chapman, 1966).Google Scholar
page 543 note 1 This paper was first read to a meeting of The Society for the Study of Theology.
page 545 note 1 In fact, it must be pointed out that there are other and different considerations which bear on the discussion of the historicity of Jesus, and I have discussed some of these in ‘History and Belief’, Theology, (1970).Google Scholar
