Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T12:38:43.862Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Language modernization and planning in comparison with other types of national modernization and planning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Joshua A. Fishman
Affiliation:
Language and Behavior Doctoral Program Yeshiva University

Abstract

The purpose of this review is two-fold. First of all, to move toward greater clarity with respect to a number of basic terms revealing less consensus in the language planning literature (e.g. planning, traditional, development, modernization, Westernization) than in the social sciences more generally. Secondly, but more importantly, to introduce into the language planning field a large number of concepts, questions and dimensions which have not yet found their way there from planning theory and planning research in other-than-language fields. In many (but not all) respects it would seem, on logical and impressionistic grounds, that language planning and other- than-language planning face similar burdens and benefit from related social and organizational circumstances.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agheyisi, B. & Fishman, J. A. (1970). Language attitude studies. AL 12. 137–57.Google Scholar
Andrzejewski, B. W. (1962). Speech and writing dichotomy as the pattern of ultilingualism in the Somali Republic. Symposium on multilingualism. Brazzaville (CSA/CCTA), 177–82.Google Scholar
Apter, D. E. (1960). The role of traditionalism in the political modernization of Ghana and Uganda. World Politics 13. 4568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Apthorpe, R. (1970). Development studies and social planning. Journal of Development Studies 6 (4). 128.Google Scholar
Benveniste, G. (1968). Towards a sociology of national development planning. Journal of Developing Areas 3. 2736.Google Scholar
Black, C. E. (1966). The dynamics of modernization; a study in comparative history. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
de Schweinitz, K. Jr., (1970). Growth, develop ment and political modernization. World Politics 22. 518–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, K. W. (1966). Nationalism and social communication. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press (second edition).Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. (1968). Language development. In Fishman, J. A., Ferguson, C. A., Gupta, J. Das (eds.) Language problems of developing nations. New York: Wiley. 2736.Google Scholar
Fishman, J. A. (1971a). Nationalism and language planning in 19th century Europe and in 20th century Africa and Asia. In Rubin and Jernudd (1975): 320.Google Scholar
Fishman, J. A. (1971b). The use of sociolinguistics. Applications of Linguistics: Selected papers of the Second International Congress of Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, J. (1967). A conceptual model for the analysis of planned behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly 12. 225–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haugen, E. (1966). Linguistics and language planning. In Bright, W. M. (ed.) Sociolinguistics. The Hague: Mouton. 5071.Google Scholar
Hoerning, K. H. (1969/1970). Secondary modernization: social changes of newly developing nations. (Monograph Series in World Affairs (University of Colorado). (4). Boulder Colorado.Google Scholar
Hyman, H. H., Levine, G. N. & Wright, R. (1970). Inducing social changes in developing countries. Development Digest 8 (2). 107–19.Google Scholar
Jacobs, N. (1971). Modernization without development: Thailand as an Asian case study. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Jernudd, B. (1971). Notes on economic analysis and language planning. In Rubin & Jernudd. 263276.Google Scholar
Jernudd, B. & Das, Gupta J. (1971). Towards a theory of language planning. In Rubin & Jernudd. 195216.Google Scholar
Lerner, D. (1958). The passing of traditional society: modernizing the Middle East. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Micaud, C. A. et al. (1964). Tunesia: the politics of modernization. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Molnos, A. (1970). Development in Africa: planning and implementation. (Information Circular No. 3.) Nairobi: East African Academy Research Information Centre.Google Scholar
Myrdal, G. (1959). The theoretical assumptions of social planning. Transactions of the Fourth World Congress of Sociology, 2. 155–67. Milano-Stresa.Google Scholar
Neustupny, J. V. (1970). Basic types of treatment of language problems. Linguistic Communications 1. 77100.Google Scholar
Ossowski, S. (1959). Social conditions and consequences of social planning. Transactions of the IV World Congress of Sociology, 2. 199222. Milano-Stresa.Google Scholar
Pfaff, R. H. (1963). Disengagement from traditionalism in Turkey and Iran. Western Political Quarterly 6. 7998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pye, L. W. (1962). Armies in the process of political modernization. In Johnson, J. J. (ed.) The role of the military in underdeveloped countries. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press. 6989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, J. (1971). Evaluation and language planning. In Rubin and Jemudd. 217252.Google Scholar
Rubin, J. and Jernudd, B. (eds.) (1971). Can language be planned? Honolulu: EWC Press.Google Scholar
Schoorl, J. W. (1970). Sociology of development: the focus of a new profession. Sociologia Neerlandica 175–83.Google Scholar
Shils, E. (1960). The intellectuals in the political development of the New States. World Politics 12 (3). 329–68.Google Scholar
Shils, E. (1962). Political Development in the New States. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Thorburn, T. (1971). Cost-benefit analysis in language planning. In Rubin and Jernudd. 253262.Google Scholar
Wriggins, W. H. (1961). Impediments to unity in new nations: the case of Ceylon. American Political Science Review 55. 313–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waterson, A. (1969). An operational approach to development planning. International Development 11 (3) 612.Google Scholar