Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Boice, Robert
and
Jones, Ferdinand
1984.
Why Academicians Don't Write.
The Journal of Higher Education,
Vol. 55,
Issue. 5,
p.
567.
Cofer, Charles N.
1985.
Some reactions to manuscript review from a questionnaire study.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 4,
p.
745.
Sternberg, Robert J.
1985.
Tacit agreements between authors and editors.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 4,
p.
746.
Peters, Douglas P.
and
Ceci, Stephen J.
1985.
Peer review: Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 4,
p.
747.
Boice, Robert
Pecker, Gayle
Zaback, Ellen
and
Barlow, David H.
1985.
A challenge to Peters and Ceci's conclusions with an examination of editorial files for reviewer appropriateness.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 4,
p.
744.
Berry, Russell L.
1985.
Administrative freedom versus academic freedom and peer reviews.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 4,
p.
743.
Bornstein, Robert F.
1991.
The predictive validity of peer review: A neglected issue.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
138.
Stricker, Lawrence J.
1991.
Disagreement among journal reviewers: No cause for undue alarm.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
163.
Adams, Kenneth M.
1991.
Peer review: An unflattering picture.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
135.
Greene, Richard
1991.
Is there an alternative to peer review?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
149.
Cohen, Patricia
1991.
Does group discussion contribute reliability of complex judgments?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
139.
Gilmore, J. Barnard
1991.
On forecasting validity and finessing reliability.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
148.
Hargens, Lowell L.
1991.
Referee agreement in context.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
150.
Salzinger, Kurt
1991.
Now that we know how low the reliability is, what shall we do?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
162.
Gorman, Michael E.
1991.
Replication, reliability and peer review: A case study.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
149.
Roediger, Henry L.
1991.
Is unreliability in peer review harmful?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
159.
Cole, Stephen
1991.
Consensus and the reliability of peer-review evaluations.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
140.
Marsh, Herbert W.
and
Ball, Samuel
1991.
Reflections on the peer review process.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
157.
Rourke, Byron P.
1991.
Toward openness and fairness in the review process.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
161.
Tyrer, Peter
1991.
Chairman's action: The importance of executive decisions in peer review.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
164.