Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T11:57:23.000Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On stage: the importance of being a nonconserver

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

Annette Karmiloff-Smith
Annette Karmiloff-Smith
Affiliation:
Faculté de Psychologie et des Sciences de l'Èducation, Université de Genève, 3 Place de l'Université, 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , June 1978 , pp. 188 - 190
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beilin, H. “Piaget's theory: refinement, revision or rejection?” Workshop on developmental models of thinking. Kiel, West Germany, September, 1977.Google Scholar
Bovet, M. et al. Prénotions physiques chez l'enfant. Archives de Psychologie. 43, no. 169:47–81. 1975.Google Scholar
Céllérier, G. Information processing tendencies in recent experiments in cognitive learning - theoretical implications, In: Farnham-Diggory, S. (ed.), Information Processing in Children. Pp. 115–123. New York, Academic Press, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilliéron, C. “Serial order and vicariant order: the limits of isomorphism,” Archives de Psychologie, XLV, 175, 183–204, 1977.Google Scholar
Inhelder, B. et al. Des structures cognitives aux procédures de découverte. Archives de Psychologie. 44, no. 171:57–72. 1976.Google Scholar
Inhelder, B. et al. Relations entre les conservations d'ensembles d'éléments discrets et celles de quantités continues. Année Psychologique. 75:23–60. 1975.Google Scholar
Inhelder, B. et al. Epistemologie Génétique et Equilibration-Hommage à Jean Piaget. Neuchâtel, Delachaux et Niestlé. 1977.Google Scholar
Joffe-Falmagne, R. “The development of logical competence: a psycholinguistic perspective.” Workshop on developmental models of thinking. Kiel, West Germany, September, 1977.Google Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P. N. “Models of Deduction” In: Johnson-Laird, P. N. and Wason, P. C. (eds.) Thinking: Readings in cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. Little Words Mean a Lot: The Plurifunctionality of Determiners in Child Language. Ph.D. thesis, University of Geneva (forthcoming, London, Cambridge University Press), 1976a.Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. The interplay between syntax, semantics and phonology in language acquisition processes. In: Campbell, R. and Smith, T. (eds.), The Stirling Conference on the Psychology of Language. London, Plenum Press, 1976b.Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. Language developments after five. In: Fletcher, P. and Garman, M. (eds.), Studies in Language Acquisition. London, Cambridge University Press, in press.Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. and Inhelder, B.If you want to get ahead, get a theory. Cognition. 3 (3): 195–212. 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J. Problems of equilibration. In: Nodine, C. F., Gallagher, J. M., and Humphreys, R. H. (eds.), Piaget and Inhelder: On Equilibration. Philadelphia, Jean Piaget Society, 1972.Google Scholar
Piaget, J.La Prise de Conscience. Paris, P.U.F. 1974. (English translation, The Grasp of Consciousness. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Piaget, J. L'équilibration des structures cognitives: problème central du développement. EEG 33. Paris, P.U.F., 1975.Google Scholar
Piaget, J.On correspondences and morphisms. Jean Piaget Society Newsletter. 5 (3). 1976.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. Some recent research and its link with a new theory of groupings and conservations based on commutability. In: Rieber, R. W. and Salzinger, K. (eds.), The Roots of American Psychology: Historical Influences and Implications for the Future.” Pp. 291, 350–57. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1977.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. et al. La Géometrie Spontanée de L'Enfant. Paris: P.U.F., 1948.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. et al. Epistémologie et psychologie de la Fonction. EEG 23. Paris: P.U.F., 1968a.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. et al. . Epistémologie et psychologie de l'Identité. EEG 24. Paris: P.U.F., 1968b.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. and Garcia, R.Les Explications Causales. Paris: P.U.F., 1971. (English translation, Understanding Causality. New York, Norton, 1974).Google Scholar
Piaget, J. and Karmiloff-Smith, A., Conflits entre symétries. In: Piaget, J.Epistémologie et Catégorie. Ch. IX. Paris: P.U.F., in press, a.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. and Karmiloff-Smith, A. Un Cas Particulier de Symétrie Inférentiel. In: Piaget, J.Epistémologie et Catégorie. Paris: P.U.F., in press, b.Google Scholar
Pinard, A. and Laurendeau, M. Stage in Piaget's cognitive developmental theory: exegesis of a concept. In: Elkind, D. and Flavell, J. H. (eds.), Studies in Cognitive Development. New York, Oxford University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Strauss, S.A reply to Brainerd. Cognition. 3 (2): 155–85. 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanner, M. and Inhelder, B. (eds.), Discussions on child development. London, Tavistock, vol. 1, 1956, Vol. IV, 1960.Google Scholar
Wermus, H.Essai de répresentation de certaines activités cognitives à l'aide des prédicate avec composantes contextuelles. Archives de Psychologie. 44, no. 171:205–21. 1976.Google Scholar