Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T03:26:25.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Functional significance of human female orgasm still hypothetical

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2019

Nicholas Pound
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8S 4K1 {daly; pound}@mcmaster.ca
Martin Daly
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8S 4K1 {daly; pound}@mcmaster.ca

Abstract

Human males are more polygamously inclined than females. However, there is substantial within-sex variation in polygamous inclinations and practices. This is acknowledged by Gangestad & Simpson but we pose the question: Is the target article's “strategic pluralism” pluralistic enough? In addition, we argue that the hypothesis that the female orgasm is an adaptation for post-copulatory female choice between rival ejaculates demands more research.

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
2000 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)