Adeguija, Efurosibina (1989). A comparative study of politeness phenomena in Nigerian English, Yoruba and Ogori. Multilingua, 8, 57–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Agha, Asif (1994). Honorification. Annual Review of Anthropology, 23, 277–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allan, Keith (1986). Linguistic meaning: Volume 1. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Allwood, Jens (1987). Linguistic communication as action and cooperation: a study in pragmatics (2nd edition). Gothenburg Graphic Systems AB: Monographs in Linguistics 2.Google Scholar

Armengaud, Francoise (1993). La pragmatique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Aronsson, Karin & Rundstrom, Bengt (1989). Cats, dogs, and sweets in the clinical negotiation of reality: on politeness and coherence in pediatric discourse. Language in Society, 18, 483–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aston, Guy (1988). Learning comity: an approach to the description and pedagogy of interactional speech. Bologna: Editrice Clueb.Google Scholar

Austin, Paddy (1988). The dark side of politeness: a pragmatic analysis of non-cooperative communication. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Christchurch, New Zealand: University of Canterbury.Google Scholar

Austin, Paddy (1990). Politeness revisited - the dark side. In Allan, Bell and Janet, Holmes (eds.), New Zealand ways of speaking English, 277–93. Clevedon/Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters Ltd.Google Scholar

Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua (ed.). (1971). Pragmatics of natural languages. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Germany.Google Scholar

Baxter, Leslie A. (1984). An investigation of compliance-gaining as politeness. Human Communication Research, 10, 427–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bayraktaroglu, Arin (1991). Politeness and international imbalance. International Journal of the Society of Language 92, 5–34.Google Scholar

Bertuccelli-Papi, Marcella (1993), Che cos'è la pragmatica? Milano: Bompiani.Google Scholar

Blakemore, Diane (1992). Understanding utterances: an introduction to pragmatics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Blommaert, Jan & Verschueren, Jef (eds.) (1991). The pragmatics of intercultural international Pragmatics Conference, Antwerp, 17–22 August 1987 and the Ghent Symposium on Intercultural Communication. Volume 3. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Blum-Kulka, Shoshana (1987). Indirectness and politeness in requests: same or different? Journal of Pragmatics, 11, 131–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blum-Kulka, Shoshana (1990). You don't touch lettuce with your fingers: parental polietness in family discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 259–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blum-Kulka, Shoshana (1992). The metapragmatics of politeness in Israeli society. In Watts, Richard J., Sachiko, Ide & Konrad, Ehlich (eds.), Politeness in language: studies in its history, theory and practice, 255–80. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Danet, Bernda & Gherson, Rimona (1985). The language of requesting in Israeli society. In Forgas, Joesph P. (ed.), Language and social situations, 113–39. Berlin/New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, House, Julliane & Kasper, Gabriele (eds.) (1989). Cross-cultural pragmatics: requests and apologies. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar

Blum-Kulka, Shoshana & Shefer, Hadess (1993). The metapragmatic discourse of American-Israeli families at dinner. In Gabriel, Kasper & Shoshana, Blum-Kulka (eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics, 196–223. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boudieu, Ruth M. (1978). Politeness. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 16, 253–6.Google Scholar

Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen C. (1978). Universals in language usage: politeness phenomena. In Goody, E. N. (ed.), Questions and politeness: strategies in social interaction, 56–324. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brown, Penlope & Levinson, Stephen C. (1987). Politeness: some universals of language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, Roger (1988). More than P' and Q'. Contemporary Psychology, 33, 749–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, Roger (1990). Politeness theory: exemplar and exemplary. In Irvin, Rock (ed.), The legacy of Soloman Asch: essays in cognition and social psychology, 23–38. Hove/London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Brown, Roger & Gilman, Albert (1989). Polietness theory and Shakespeare's four major tragedies. Language in Society, 18, 159–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burt, Susan Meredith (1990). External and internal conflict: conversational code-switching and the theory of politeness. Sociolinguistics, 19, 21–35.Google Scholar

Butler, Christopher S. (1988). Politeness and the semantics of modalised directives in English. In Benson, J. D., Cummings, M. & Greaves, W. S. (eds.), Linguistics in a systemic perspective, 119–53. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butler, Christopher S. & Channell, Joanna (1989). Researching politeness in a second language. In Butler, Christopher S., Cardwell, Richard A. and Joanna, Channell (eds.), Language and literature – theory and practice: a tribute to Walter Grauberg, 1–16. Nottingham Linguistic Circular Special Issue in association with University of Nottingham Monographs in the Humanities.Google Scholar

Carrell, Patricia L. & Konneker, Beverly H. (1981). Politeness: comparing native and nonnative judgements. Language Learning, 31, 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cherry, Roger D. (1988). Politeness in written persuasion. Journal of Pragmatics, 12, 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, Herbert & Carlson, Thomas (1982). Hearers and speech acts. Language, 58, 332–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, Herbert H. & Schunk, Dale H. (1980). Polite responses to polite requests. Cognition, 8, 111–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Clark, Herbert H. & Schunk, Dale H. (1981). Politeness in requests: a rejoinder to Kemper and Thissen. Cognition, 9, 311–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Coupland, Nikolas, Grainger, Karen & Coupland, Justine (1988). Politeness in context: intergenerational issues (review article). Language in Society, 17, 253–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craig, R. T., Tracy, K. & Spisak, F. (1986). The discourse of requests: assessment of a politeness approach. Human Communication Research, 12, 437–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dascal, Marcelo (1983). Pragmatics and the philosophy of mind 7: Thought in language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, Eirlys E. (1987). A contrastive approach to the analysis of politeness formulas. Applied Linguistics, 8, 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davis, Steven (ed.) (1991). Pragmatics: a reader. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

D'souza, Jean (1988). Interactional strategies in South Asian languages: their implications for teaching English internationally. World Englishes, 7, 159–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DuFon, Margaret A., Kasper, Gabriele, Takahashi, Satomi & Yoshinaga, Naoko (1994). Bibliography on linguistic politeness. Journal of Pragmatics, 21, 527–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dzameshie, Alex K. (1995). Social motivations for politeness behavior in Christian sermonic discourse. Anthropological Linguistics, 37, 192–215.Google Scholar

Errington, J. Joseph (1988). Structure and style in Javanese: a semiotic view of linguistic etiquette. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Escandell-Vidal, M. Victoria (1993). Introduction a la pragmática. Barcelona: Anthropos.Google Scholar

Escandell-Vidal, M. Victoria (1996). Towards a cognitive approach to politeness. In Katarzyna, Jaszczolt & Ken, Turner (eds.), Selected papers from the First International Conference on Contrastive Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Fasold, Ralph (1990). The sociolinguistics of language: Introduction to sociolinguistics, Volume 2. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Ferguson, Charles A. (1981). The structure and use of politeness formulas. In Florian, Coulmas (ed.), Conversational routine: explorations in standardized communication situations and prepatterned speech, 21–35. The Hague: Mouton Publishers.Google Scholar

Fill, Alwin (1986). ‘Divided illocution’ in conversational and other situations - and some of its implications. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 27–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fonseca, Joaguim (1994). Pragmatica linguistica: introdução, teoria e desção do Português. Porto: Porto Editora.Google Scholar

Fraser, Bruce (1990). Perspectives on politeness. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 219–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fraser, Bruce & Nolan, William (1981). The association of deference with linguistic form. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 27, 93–109.Google Scholar

Gallardo-Pauls, Beatriz (1993). Linguiüstica perceptiva y conversation: secuencias. València: Universitat de València.Google Scholar

Gazdar, Gerald (1979). Pragmatics: implicature, presupposition, and logical form. London/New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Gazdar, Gerald (1980). Pragmatics and logical form. Journal of Pragmatics, 4, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Givón, Talmy (1989). Mind, code and context: essays in pragmatics. London/Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Glover, Kelly D. (1995). A prototype view of context and linguistic behaviour: context prototypes and talk. Journal of Pragmatics, 23, 137–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gobber, Giovanni (ed.) (1992). La linguistica pragmatica: atti del XXIV Congresso della Società di Linguistica Italiana, Milano, 4–6 September 1990. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving (1955). On face-work: an analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes, 18, 213–31. Reprinted in his (1967) Interaction ritual: essays on face-to-face behaviour, 5–45. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving (1956). The nature of deference and demeanor. American Anthropologist, 58, 473–502. Reprinted in his (1967) Interaction ritual: essays on face-to-face behaviour, 47–95. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving (1981). Footing. In his Forms of talk, 124–59. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Gonzales, M., Pederson, J., Manning, D. & Wetter, D. (1990). Pardon my gaffe: effects of sex, status, and consequence severity on accounts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 610–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Green, Georgia M. (1989). Pragmatics and natural language understanding. Hillsdale, New Jersey/Hove and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Grice, Paul (1975). Logic and conversation. In Peter, Cole and Morgan, Jerry L. (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, 41–58. New York/San Francisco/London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Grice, Paul (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, Massachusetts/London, England: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Grimshaw, Allen D. (1979). Review of Goody, E. N. (ed.), Questions and politeness: strategies in social interaction. Language in Society, 8, 112–20.Google Scholar

Grundy, Peter (1995). Doing pragmatics. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Gu, Yueguo (1990). Politeness in modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 237–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haberland, Hartmut & Mey, Jacob L. (1977). Editorial: Linguistics and pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics, 1, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hagge, John & Kostelnick, Charles (1989). Linguistic politeness in professional prose: a discourse analysis of auditor's suggestion letters, with implications for business communication pedagogy. Written Communication, 6, 312–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harnish, Robert M. (ed.) (1994). Basic topics in the philosophy of language. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar

Held, Gudrun (1992). Politeness in linguistic research. In Richard, J.Watts, Sachiko Ide & Konrad, Ehlich (eds.), Politeness in language: studies in its history, theory and practice, 131–53. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

HillBeverly, Ide, Sachiko, Ikuta, Shoko, Kawasaki, Akiko Beverly, Ide, Sachiko, Ikuta, Shoko, Kawasaki, Akiko & Ogino, Tsunao (1986). Universals of linguistic politeness: quantitative evidence from Japanese and American English. Journal of Pragmatics, 10, 347–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hiraga, M. K. & Turner, J. M. (1996). Differing perceptions of face in British and Japanese academic settings. In Jaszczolt, & Turner, (eds.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ho, David Yau-Fai (1975). On the concept of face. American Journal of Sociology, 81, 867–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holmes, Janet (1992). An introduction to sociolinguistics. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Holtgraves, Thomas (1991). Interpreting questions and replies: effects of face-threat, question form and gender. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54, 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holtgraves, Thomas & Yang, Joong-Nam (1992). Interpersonal underpinnings of request strategies: general principles and differences due to culture and gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 246–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Horn, Laurence R. (1988). Pragmatic theory. In Newmeyer, F. J. (ed.), Linguistics: the Cambridge survey 1. Linguistic theory: foundations, 113–45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Horn, Laurence R. (1992). Pragmatics, implicaturc, and presupposition. In William, Bright (ed.), International encyclopedia of linguistics, Volume 3, 260–6. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

House, Juliane & Kasper, Gabriele (1981). Politeness markers in English and German. In Florian, Coulmas (ed.), Conversational routine: explorations in standardized communication situations and prepatterned speech, 157–85. The Hague: Mouton Publishers.Google Scholar

Hu, Hsien Chin (1944). The Chinese concepts of ‘face’. American Anthropologist, 46, 45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hudson, Richard A. (1980). Sociolingnistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Hymes, Dell H. (1986). Discourse: scope without depth. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 57, 49–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ide, Sachiko (1989). Formal forms and discernment: two neglected aspects of universal of linguistic politeness. Multilingna, 8, 223–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ide, Sachiko (1989). Preface: the search for integrated universals of linguistic politeness. Miiltilingna, 12, 7–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Janney, Richard W. & Arndt, Horst (1993). Universality and relativity in cross-cultural politeness research: a historical perspective. Miiltilingna, 12, 13–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jaszczolt, Katarzyna & Turner, Ken (eds.) (1996). Selected papers from the First International Conference on Contrastive Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Johnson, Donna M. (1992). Compliments and politeness in peer-review texts. Applied Linguistics, 13, 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, Donna M. & Yang, Agnes Weigun (1990). Politeness strategics in peer review texts. In Bouton, Lawrence F. & Yamuna, Kachru (eds.), Pragmatics and language learning. Volume 1, 99–114. Division of English as an International Language, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar

Jucker, Andreas H. (1986). News interviews: a pragmalingnistic analysis. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jucker, Andreas H. (1988). The relevance of politeness. Miiltilingna, 7, 375–84.Google Scholar

Kasher, Asa (1986). Politeness and rationality. In Jorgen, Dines Johansen & Harley, Sonne (eds.), Pragmatics and linguistics: Festschrift for Jacob L. Mey on his 60th birthday, 30th October 1986, 103–14. Odense: Odense University Press.Google Scholar

Kasper, Gabriele (1990). Linguistic politeness: current research issues. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 193–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kasper, Gabriele (1992). Pragmatic transfer. Second Language Research, 8, 203–31.Google Scholar

Kasper, Gabriele (1994). Politeness. In Asher, R. E. & Simpson, J. M. Y. (eds.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics, Volume 6, 3206–11. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Kasper, Gabriele & Blum-Kulka, Shoshana (eds.) (1993). Interlanguage pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Katriel, Tamar (1986). Talking straight: ‘Dngri’ speech in Israeli ‘Sabra’ culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kelley, William R. (1987). How to get along with language: a theory of politeness phenomena. Papers from the 23rd Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society: Part One, The General Session, 181–95.Google Scholar

Kemper, Susan & Thissen, David (1981). How polite?: A reply to Clark and Schunk. Cognition, 9, 305–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kemper, Susan & Thissen, David (1981a). Memory for the dimensions of requests. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 552–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kempson, Ruth (1988). Grammar and conversational principles. In Newmeyer, F. J. (ed.), Linguistics: the Cambridge survey II. Linguistic theory: extensions and implications, 139–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine (1992). Les interactions verbales: Tome II. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar

Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine (1994). Les interactions verbales: Tome III. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar

Kingwell, Mark (1993). Is it rational to be polite? Journal of Philosophy, 90, 387–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuiper, Koenraad (1991). Sporting formulae in New Zealand English: two models of male solidarity. In Jenny, Cheshire (ed.), English around the world: sociolingnistic perspectives, 200–9. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kumar, Ibha & Sah, Prajapati (1994). Why are we polite? International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics, 23, 121–9.Google Scholar

Lachenicht, L. G. (1980). Aggravating language: a study of abusive and insulting language. Papers in Linguistics, 13, 607–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lakoff, Robin (1972). Language in context. Language, 48, 907–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lakoff, Robin (1973). The logic of politeness; or, minding your P's and Q's. Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 292–305.Google Scholar

Lakoff, Robin (1977). What you can do with words: politeness, performatives, and pragmatics. In Rogers, A., Wall, B. & Murray, J.-P. (eds.), On performatives, presuppositions and implicatures, 79–105. Arlington: Centre for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar

Lakoff, Robin Tolmach (1979). Stylistic strategies within a grammar of style. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 327, 53–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lakoff, Robin Tolmach (1989). The limits of politeness: therapeutic and courtroom discourse. Miiltilingna, 8, 101–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lakoff, Robin (1990). Philosophy of language meets the real world; or, when is ‘enough’ enough? Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session and Parasession on the Legacy of Crice, 472–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lavandera, Beatriz R. (1988). The social pragmatics of politeness forms. In Ulrich, Ammon, Norbert, Dittmar & Mattheier, Klaus J. (eds.), Sociolingnistics: an international handbook of the science of language and society, 1196–1205. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey N. (1977). Language and tact. L.A.U.T. Series A, Paper 46.Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey N. (1980). Explorations in semantics and pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey N. (1981). Pragmatics and conversational rhetoric. In Herman, Parret, Marina, Sbisà & Jef, Verschueren (eds.), Possibilities and limitations of pragmatics: Proceedings of the Conference on Pragmatics, Urbino, 8–14 July 1979, 413–441. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London/New York: Longman.Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey N. (1992). Pragmatic principles in Shaw's you Never Can Tell. In Michael, Toolan (ed.), Language, text and context: essays in stylistics, 259–78. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey N. & Thomas, Jenny (1990). Language, meaning and context: pragmatics. In Collinge, N. E. (ed.), An encyclopedia of language, 173–206. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lee-Wong, Song Mei (1994). Imperatives in requests: director impolite – observations from Chinese. Pragmatics, 4, 491–515.Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levinson, Stephen (1988). Putting linguistics on a proper footing: explorations in Goffman's concepts of participation. In Paul, Drew & Anthony, Wooton (eds.), Erving Goffman: exploring the interaction order, 161–227. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Maier, Paula (1992). Politeness strategies in business letters by native and non-native English speakers. English for Specific Purposes, 11, 189–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mao, Luming Robert (1994). Beyond politeness theory: ‘face’ revisited and renewed. Journal of Pragmatics, 21, 451–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mathiot, Madeleine (1982). Review of Goody, E. N. (ed.), Questions and politeness: strategies in social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 6, 70–3.Google Scholar

Matsumoto, Yoshiko (1988). Reexamination of the universality of face: politeness phenomena in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics, 12, 403–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matsumoto, Yoshiko (1989). Politeness and conversational universals – observations from Japanese. Multilingua, 8, 207–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCawley, James (1984). Speech acts and Goffman's participant roles. Proceedings of the First Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, 260–74.Google Scholar

Meier, A. J. (1995). Passages of politeness. Journal of Pragmatics, 24, 381–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mey, Jacob L. (ed.) (1979). Pragmalinguistics: theory and practice. The Hague/Paris: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mey, Jacob L. (1993a). Pragmatics: an introduction. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Mey, Jacob L. (1993b). Pragmatics in the nineties: topics, trends, perspectives. Plenary Talk at the 4th International Pragmatics Conference, Kobe, Japan. 30 July 1993.Google Scholar

Mey, Jacob L. (1994a). Pragmatics. In Asher, R. E. & Simpson, J. M. Y. (eds.), The Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, Volume 6, 3260–78. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Mey, Jacob L. (1994b). How to do good things with words: a social pragmatics for survival. Pragmatics, 4, 239–63.Google Scholar

DeMey, Sjaak Mey, Sjaak (1994). A new impetus to pragmatics. Studies in Applied Linguistics, 1, 141–64.Google Scholar

Moeschler, Jacques (1985). Argumentation et conversation: éléments pour line analyse pragmatique du discours. Paris: HatierCrédif.Google Scholar

Myers, Greg (1989). The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied Linguistics, 10, 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nwoye, Onuigbo G. (1989). Linguistic politeness in Igbo. Multilingua, 8, 259–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nwoye, Onuigbo G. (1992). Linguistic politeness and socio-cultural variations of the notion of face. Journal of Pragmatics, 18, 309–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Obilade, Tony (1984). Mother tongue influence on polite communication in a second language. Language and Communication, 4, 295–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'driscoll, Jim (1996). About face: a defense and elaboration of universal dualism. Journal of Pragmatics, 25, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oleksy, Wieslaw (ed.) (1989). Contrastive pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Parret, Herman, Sbsà, Marina & Verschueren, Jef (eds.) (1981). Possibilities and Limitations of Pragmatics: Proceedings of the Conference on Pragmatics, Urbino, 8–14 July 1979. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pearson, Bethyl (1988). Power and politeness in conversation: encoding of face-threatening acts at church business meetings. Anthropological Linguistics, 30, 68–93.Google Scholar

Penman, Robyn (1990). Facework and politeness: multiple goals in courtroom discourse. In Karen, Tracy & Nikolas, Coupland (eds.), Multiple Coals in Discourse, 15–38. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.Google Scholar

Renkema, Jan (1993). Discourse studies: an introductory textbook. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sbisà, Marina (1989). Linguaggio, ragione, interazione: per una teoria pragmatica degli atti linguistici. Bologna: II Mulino.Google Scholar

Scheerhorn, Dirk R. (1991/2). Politeness in decision-making. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 25, 253–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmidt, Richard W. (1980). Review of Goody, E. N. (ed.), Questions and politeness: strategies in social interaction. RELC Journal, 11, 100–14.Google Scholar

Schulze, Rainer (1986). Strategic indeterminacy and face-work. Stadia Anglica Posnaniensia, 19, 75–89.Google Scholar

Schulze, Rainer (1987). Persuasive strategies and face-work in impromptu speech. In Kari, Sajavaara (ed.), Discourse analysis: openings, 21–49. Reports from the Department of English, University of Jyväskyla, No. 9.Google Scholar

Scollon, Ron & Scollon, Suzanne B. K. (1981). Narrative, literacy and face in interethnic communication. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar

Scollon, Ron & Scollon, Suzanne B. K. (1983). Face in interethnic communication. In Richards, Jack C. & Schmidt, Richard W. (eds.), Language and Communication, 156–88. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Scollon, Ron & Scollon, Suzanne Wong (1995). Intercultural communication: a discourse approach. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Sifianou, Maria (1992). Politeness phenomena in England and Greece: a cross-cultural perspective. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Slama-Cazacu, Tatiana (1986). The concept of politeness and its formulas in the Romanian language. In Fishman, Joshua A., Andrée, Tabouret-Keller, Michael, Clyne, Krishnamurti, Bh. & Mohamed, Abdulaziz (eds.), The Fergusonian impact: in honor of Charles A. Ferguson on the occasion of his 65th birthday, Volume 2: Sociolinguistics and the sociology of language, 35–58. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Slugowski, Ben R. & Turnbull, William (1988). Cruel to be kind and kind to be cruel: sarcasm, banter and social relations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 7, 101–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spencer-Oatey, Helen (1992). Cross-cultural politeness: British and Chinese conceptions of the tutor-student relationship. Unpublished Ph.D thesis, University of Lancaster.Google Scholar

Spencer-Oatey, Helen (1993). Conceptions of social relations and pragmatics research. Journal of Pragmatics, 20, 27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deirdre (1986). Relevance: communication and cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Statis, S. (1982). // dialogo: considerazioni di linguistica pragmatica. Napoli: Lignori.Google Scholar

Strecker, Ivo (1988). The social practice of symbolization: an anthropological analysis. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar

Subbarao, K. V., Agnihotri, R. K. & Mukherjee, A. (1991). Syntactic strategics and politeness phenomena. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 92, 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tanaka, Shigenori & Kawade, S. (1983). Politeness and second language acquisition. Psychologia, 26, 40–53.Google Scholar

Thomas, Jenny (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4, 91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomas, Jenny (1984). Cross-cultural discourse as ‘unequal encounter’: towards a pragmatic analysis. Applied Linguistics, 5, 226–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomas, Jenny (1995). Meaning in interaction: an introduction to pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Thomas, Richmond H. (1990). Accommodation, meaning, and implicature: interdisciplinary foundations for pragmatics. In Cohen, Philip R., Jerry, Morgan & Pollack, Martha E. (eds.), Intentions in communication, 325–63. Cambridge, Massachusetts/London, England: The M.I.T. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ting-Toomy, S. (ed.) (1994). The challenge of face-work: cross-cultural and interpersonal issues. New York: University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Travis, Charles (1981). The true and the false: the domain of the pragmatic. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trognon, Alain & Ghiglione, Rodolphe (1993). Où va la pragmatique? De la pragmatiqiie a la psychologie sociale. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.Google Scholar

Turner, Ken (1995). The principal principles of pragmatic inference: co-operation. Language Teaching, 28, 67–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turner, Ken (in preparation). Wx = D(S, H)+P(H, S)+RX.Google Scholar

Verschueren, Jef (ed.) (1991a). Pragmatics at issue: selected papers of the International Pragmatics Conference, Antwerp, 17–22 August 1987, Volume 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Verschueren, Jef (ed.) (1991b). Levels of linguistic adaptation: selected papers of the International Pragmatics Conference, Antwerp, 17–22 August 1987, Volume 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Verschueren, Jef & Bertuccelli-Papi, Marcella (eds.) (1987). The pragmatic perspective: selected papers from the 1985 International Pragmatics Conference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wardhaugh, Ronald (1992). An introduction to sociolinguistics, 2nd edition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Watts, Richard J. (1992). Linguistic politeness and politic verbal behaviour: reconsidering claims for universality. In Watts, Richard J., Sachiko, Ide & Konrad, Ehlich (eds.), Politeness in language: studies in its history, theory and practice, 1–17. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Watts, Richard J., Ide, Sachiko &: Ehlich, Konrad (1992). Introduction. In Watts, Richard J., Sachiko, Ide & Konrad, Ehlich (eds.), Politeness in language: studies in its history, theory and practice, 1–17. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wheeler, Max W. (1994). ‘Politeness’, sociolinguistic theory and language change. Folia Linguistica Historica, 15, 149–74.Google Scholar

Wierzuicka, Anna (1991). Cross-cultural pragmatics: the semantics of human interaction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilson, Steven R.Kim, Min-Sun & Meischke, Hendrika (1991/2). Evaluating Brown and Levinson's politeness theory: a revised analysis of directives and face. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 25, 215–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yahya-Othman, Saida (1994). Covering one's social back: politeness among the Swahili. Text, 14, 141–61.Google Scholar

Zajdman, Anat (1995). Humorous face-threatening acts: humor as strategy. Journal of Pragmatics, 23, 325–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zheng, Liman (1993). Footing and speaker intention: a study in interactional linguistics. Papers from the 29th Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society: Volume 1; The Main Session, 493–99.Google Scholar