Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T04:39:49.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 October 2009

James P. Lantolf
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State University, USAjpl7@psu.edu, tgb131@psu.edu
Tracy G. Beckett
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State University, USAjpl7@psu.edu, tgb131@psu.edu

Extract

Second language acquisition (SLA) research informed by sociocultural theory (henceforth, SCT) began in earnest with the publication of Frawley & Lantolf's (1985) article on L2 (second language) discourse (described in the timeline proper). Since then, well over 300 journal articles, book chapters and doctoral dissertations have appeared in the research literature. Although the term ‘sociocultural’ is often applied to a wide array of approaches to research that seeks to understand what it means to be a human being, in the present timeline, we restrict its interpretation to refer to the specific theory of psychological development proposed by Vygotsky (1986). Other approaches that have appropriated the term, such as those emanating from the writings of Bakhtin (1981), while compatible in many respects with Vygotskian theory, have a different focus and are not strictly speaking psychological or psycholinguistic theories. To be sure, Vygotsky rarely used the term ‘sociocultural’, preferring instead ‘cultural psychology’ or ‘cultural-historical psychology’ to refer to his theory. Wertsch (1985) is generally credited with having coined the term ‘sociocultural’ as a way of capturing the notion that human mental functioning results from participation in, and appropriation of, the forms of cultural mediation integrated into social activities.

Type
Research Timeline
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin, TX: University of Texas.Google Scholar
Frawley, W. & Lantolf, J. P. (1985). Second language discourse: A Vygotskyan perspective. Applied Linguistics 6, 1944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leontiev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Negueruela, E. (2003). A sociocultural approach to teaching and researching second language: Systemic-theoretical instruction and second language development. Ph.D. dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1926)/1997). Educational psychology. Boca Raton, FL: St. Lucie Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Language and thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar