Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:43:44.049Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Base Camp Paradox: A Reflection on the Place of Tâtonnement in General Equilibrium Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

Michel De Vroey
Michel De Vroey
Affiliation:
Université Catholique de Louvain
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A basic issue in political economy is the question of how a decentralized economy is possible: How can a system survive and, moreover, be efficient, if all decisions are taken independently, that is, without any explicit coordination? The issue has two sides to it. On the one hand, it is a “thought experiment,” falsifiable only on logical grounds, an object of debate for the sake of pure intellectual interest, even for people who might not live in a market economy. On the other hand, for those who do or might live in such an economy, a thought experiment of this kind contains a critical political dimension, for the conclusions derived from it will usually be appealed to in arguing about the ideal organization of the economy.

Type
Essays
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , October 1990 , pp. 235 - 253
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Clower, Robert, and Friedman, Daniel. 1986. “Trade Specialists and Money in an Ongoing Exchange Economy.” Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 02:115–23.Google Scholar
Davidson, Paul. 1982–1983. “Rational Expectations. A Fallacious Foundation for Studying Crucial Decision-Making Process.” Journal of Post-Keynesion Economics 5:182–98.Google Scholar
De Vroey, Michel. 1987. “La possibilité d'une économie décentralisée. Esquisse d'une alternative à la théorie de 1' équilibre général.” Revue Economique, July.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Peter. 1982. “Aggregate Demand Management in Search Equilibrium.” Journal of Political Economy 51:881–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, H. D. 1933. “Price Formation in a Socialist Economy.” Economic Journal 43:237–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, Franklin. 1983. Disequilibrium Foundations of Equilibrium Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, Franklin. 1987. “Adjustment Process and Stability.” The New Palgrave. A Dictionary of Economics, Vol. 1, pp. 26–29. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Foley, Duncan K. 1986. Money, Accumulation and Crisis. London: Harwoad Academic Publisher.Google Scholar
Hahn, Frank. 1984. Equilibrium and Macroeconomics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hahn, Frank. 1987. “Auctioneer.” The New Palgrave. A Dictionary of Economics, Vol. 1, pp. 136–38. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hahn, Frank, and Negishi, Takashi. 1962. “A Theorem of Non-tâtonnement Stability.” Econometrica 30:463–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, Daniel. 1984. “Are General Equilibrium Theories Explanatory?” In The Philosophy of Economics. An Anthology, edited by Hausman, Daniel, pp. 344–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. 1948. Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Howitt, P. W. 1973. “Walras and Monetary Theory.” Western Economic Journal 11:487–93.Google Scholar
Howitt, P. W. 1985. “Transaction Costs in the Theory of Unemployment.” American Economic Review 75:88–100.Google Scholar
Jaffe, William. 1981. “Another Look at Léon Walras' Theory of Tâtonnement.” History of Political Economy. Reprinted in William Jaffe's Essays on Walras, pp. 244–66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lavoie, Don. 1985. Rivalry and Central Planning. The Socialist Calculation Debate Reconsidered. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leijonhufvud, Axel. 1964. Information and Coordination. Essays in Macroeconomic Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leijonhufvud, Axel. 1968. On Keynesian Economics and the Economics of Keynes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Lippincott (editor). 1938. On the Economic Theory of Socialism. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Lucas, Robert. 1987. Models of Business Cycles. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mongin, Philippe. 1988. “Le réalisme des hypothèses et la Partial Interpretation View.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences [Philosophie des Sciences Sociales] 18:281–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Negishi, Takashi. 1987. “Tâtonnement and Recontracting.” The New Palgrave. A Dictionary of Economics, Vol. 2, pp. 589–95. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ostroy, Joseph, and Starr, Ross. 1974. “Money and the Decentralization of Exchange.” Econometrica 42:1093–1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmund, Phelps (editor). 1970. Microeconomic Foundations of Employment and Inflation Theory. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. 1941. “The Stability of Equilibrium: Comparative Statics and Dynamics.” Econometrica 9:97–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaughn, Karen. 1980. “Economic Calculation under Socialism: The Austrian Contribution.” Economic Inquiry 18:535–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Donald. 1972. “Competitive Tâtonnement Exchange Markets.” Kyklos 25:345–63.Google Scholar
Walker, Donald. 1987a. “Walras' Theory of Tâtonnement.” Journal of Political Economy 95:758–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Donald. 1987b. “Edgeworth versus Walras on Tâtonnement.” Eastern Economic Journal 13:156–65.Google Scholar
Donald, Walker.(editor). 1983. William Jaffé's Essays on Walras. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Donald, Walker.(editor). 1984. Money and Markets. Essays by Robert Clower. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weintraub, E. R. 1979. Microfoundations. The Compatibility of Microeconomics and Macroeconomics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar