Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T14:56:17.618Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Utilitarianism as a Public Philosophy, Robert E. Goodin. Cambridge University Press, 1995, 352 + xii pages.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2009

Jonathan Baron
Jonathan Baron
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , April 1998 , pp. 151 - 157
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baron, Jonathan. 1994. ‘Nonconsequentialist decisions’ (with commentary and reply). Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17:1–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, Jonathan. 1996. ‘Do No harm’. In Codes of Conduct: Behavioral Research into Business Ethics, pp. 197–213. Messick, David M. and Tenbrunsel, Ann E. (eds.). Russell Sage FoundationGoogle Scholar
Baron, Jonathan. Forthcoming. Personal Intuition, Public Failure. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Baron, Jonathan and Frisch, Deborah. 1994. ‘Ambiguous Probabilities and the Paradoxes of Expected Utility’. In Subjective Probability, pp. 273–94. Wright, George and Ayton, Peter (eds.). WileyGoogle Scholar
Beattie, Jane and Baron, Jonathan. 1995. ‘In-kind vs. out-of-kind penalties: preference and valuation’. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 1:136–51Google Scholar
Breyer, Stephen. 1993. Breaking the Vicious Circle: Toward Effective Risk Regulation. Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Calfee, John E. and Rubin, Paul H.. 1992. ‘Some implications of damage payments for nonpecuniary losses’. Journal of Legal Studies, 21:371 ffCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camerer, Colin and Weber, Martin. 1992. ‘Recent developments in modeling preferences: uncertainty and ambiguity’. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5:326–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawes, Robyn M., Faust, David and Meehl, Paul E.. 1989. ‘Clinical versus actuarial judgment’. Science, 243:1668–74CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elster, Jon. 1989. Solomonaic Judgments. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Frank, Robert H. and Cook, Philip J.. 1995. The Winner-Take-All Society. Free PressGoogle Scholar
Haidt, Jonathan and Baron, Jonathan. 1996. ‘Social roles and the moral judgment of acts and omissions’. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26:201–183.0.CO;2-J>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lackey, Douglas P. 1982. ‘Morals and missiles: a utilitarian look at nuclear deterrence’. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 11:189–231Google Scholar