Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-15T02:44:10.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

PATIENT'S PERSPECTIVE ON HYPERBARIC OXYGEN TREATMENT OF OSTEORADIONECROSIS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2014

Anne Lee ,
Lone Forner  and
Erik C. Jansen
Anne Lee
Affiliation:
Centre for Applied Health Services Research and Technology Assessment, University of Southern Denmark
Lone Forner
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesia, and Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Copenhagen University Hospital
Erik C. Jansen
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesia, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Copenhagen University Hospital
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is a known complication to radiation therapy for head and neck cancer with a prevalence of 5–7% among radiated patients. Treatment might include dental surgery and reconstruction of the jawbone as well as hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBOT). HBOT takes place in a closed compartment where patients are breathing 100% oxygen under pressure for 90 minutes once a day every weekday for 6 weeks. In Denmark, HBOT is available at two facilities with very different organizational set-ups.

Keywords

Hyperbaric facilitiesHyperbaric oxygenOsteoradionecrosisRadiotherapyPatient perspectives
Type
Assessments
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , April 2014 , pp. 188 - 193
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Brennan, MT, Elting, L, Spijkervet, FKL. Systematic reviews of oral complications of cancer therapies, Oral Care Study Group, MASCC/ISOO: Methodology and quality of the literature. Support Care Cancer. 2010;18:979–984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Brennan, MT, Spijkervet, FKL, Elting, L. Systematic reviews and guidelines for oral complications of cancer therapies: Current challenges and future opportunities. Support Care Cancer. 2010;18:977–978.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Peterson, De, Doerr, W, Hovan, A, et al. Osteoradionecrosis in cancer patients: The evidence base for treatment dependent frequency, current management strategies, and future studies. Support Care Cancer. 2010;18:1089–1098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Spiegelberg, L, van Neck, HW, Wolvius, EB, van der Wal, KG. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy in the management of radiation-induced injury in the head and neck region: A review of the literature. J Oral Maxillcac Surg. 2010;68:1732–1739.Google Scholar
5. Forner, L, Lee, A, Kruse, M, Jansen, EC, Sørensen, J. Hyperbaric oxygen treatment of injuries after radiotherapy for head and neck cancer – a health technology assessment; Summary. Copenhagen: Danish Health and Medicines Authority, Danish Centre of Health Technology. Assessment (DACEHTA), 2012 Health Technology Assessment funded projects 2012.Google Scholar
6. Spradley, JP. Participant Observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston; 1980.Google Scholar
7. Smith, JA, Flowers, P, Larkin, M. Interpretative phenomenological analysis. Theory, method and research. London: SAGE Publications; 2009.Google Scholar
8. NVivo 10, QSR International PTY. Ltd. Google Scholar
9. Bowlby, J. A secure base. Clinical applications of attachment theory. New York: Routledge; 1988.Google Scholar
10. Gerlach, NL, Barkhuysen, R, Kaanders, JHAM, Janssens, GORJ, Sterk, W. The effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on quality of life in oral and oropharyngeal canter patients treated with radiotherapy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;37:255–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Harding, SA, Hodder, SC, Courtney, DJ, Bryson, PJ. Impact of perioperatic hyperbaric oxygen therapy on the quality of life of maxillofacial patients who undergo surgery in irradiated fields. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;37:617–624.Google Scholar
12. London, SD, Park, SS, Gampper, TJ, Hoard, MA. Hyperbaric oxygen for the management of radionecrosis of bone and cartilage. Laryngoscope. 1998;108:1291–1296.Google Scholar
13. Hjelm, K, Löndahl, M, Katzman, P, Apelqvist, J. Diabetic persons with foot ulcers and their perceptions of hyperbaric oxygen chamber therapy. J Clin Nursing. 2009;18:1975–1985.Google Scholar
14. Chalmers, A, Mitchell, C, Rosenthal, M, Elliott, D. An exploration of patients' memories and experiences of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in a multiplace chamber. J Clin Nursing. 2007;16:1454–1459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Plafki, C, Peters, P, Weslau, W, Busch, R. Complications and side effects of hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2000;71:119–124.Google ScholarPubMed
16. Clark, C, Rock, D. Tackett K. Assessment of the magnitude of anxiety in adults undergoing first oxygen treatment in a hyperbaric chamber. Mil Med. 1994;159:412–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Allen, KD, Danforth, JS, Drabman, RS. Videotaped modeling and film distraction for fear reduction in adults ungergoing hyperbariv oxygen therapy. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1989;57:554–558.Google Scholar
18. Harding, S, Courtney, D, Hodder, S, Bryson, P. Effects of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on quality of life in maxillocacial patients with Type III osteoradionecrosis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70:2786–2792.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Annane, D, Depondt, J, Aubert, P, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for radionecrosis of the jaw: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial from the ORN96 study group. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:4893–4900.Google Scholar