Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T06:45:13.064Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Naturalized Female Intellect

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Lorraine Daston
Lorraine Daston
Affiliation:
Institut für WissenschaftsgeschichteUniversität Göttingen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Naturalization confers authority on beliefs, conventions, and claims, but what kind of authority? Because the meaning of nature has a history, so does that of naturalization:naturalization is not the same tactic when marshaled in, say, eighteenth-century France and in late nineteenth-century Britain. Although the authority of nature may be invoked in both cases, the import of that authority depends crucially on whether nature is understood normatively or descriptively, within the framework of the natural laws of jurisprudence or within that of the natural laws of mechanics. During the early modern period, the denotative center of gravity of the word “nature” shifted dramatically. Writings about the female intellect are particularly well suited to reflect and focus these changes for three reasons: first, as with so many aspects of gender identity, what was distinctively female about women's way of thinking was usually alleged to be part and parcel of their “nature”; second, thepolitical and social implications of the female intellect were debated heatedly and in unprecedented detail, particularly in France; and third, the actual content of beliefs about what traits sex the intellect as female remained relatively constant during this period, despite sharp differences of opinion over their putative “natural” causes. The female intellect was naturalized not once but repeatedly, and therein lies its value for a history of naturalization.

Type
Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , Autumn 1992 , pp. 209 - 235
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agrippa, Henry Cornelius. [1566] 1670. Female Pre-Eminence: Or the Dignity and Excellence of That Sex, above the Male, translated by C[are], H[enry] London.Google Scholar
d‘Alembert, Jean, and Diderot, Denis. eds. [1969. Encyclopédie, ou Dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des mëtiers. Vols. 1–35. Paris: Chez Briasson: Compact edition. 5 vols. New York: Readex Microprint.Google Scholar
Algarotti, F. 1739. Le Newionianisme pour les dames, ou entretiens sur la lumiëre, sur les couleurs, et sur l'attraction, translated from Italian by de Castera, Du Perron. Paris: Montalant.Google Scholar
Aristotle, 1984.Google Scholar
Ascoli, Georges. 1906. “Essai sur l'histoire des idëes fëministes en France, du XVIe siècle à la Révolution. Revue de synthèse historique 13:25–183.Google Scholar
Baasner, Frank. 1986. “The Changing Meaning of‘Sensibilité‘: 1654 till 1704”. Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture 15:77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Jonathan. ed. 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle. Revised Oxford translation, 2 vols. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Binet, A. 1898. “La Mesure en psychologie individuelle” Revue philosophique 46:113–23.Google Scholar
Bleier, Ruth. 1988. “Sex Differences Research: Science or Belief?” In Feminist Approaches to Science, edited by Bleier, R., 147–64. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Boswell, John. 1981. Christianity, Social Tolerance, and Homosexuality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Broca, P. 1861. “Sur le volume et la forme du cerveau suivant les individus et suivant les races”. Bulletin de la Société d'Anthropologie de Paris 2:139–207.Google Scholar
Brundage, James A. 1987. Law, Sex, and Christian Society in Medieval Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burtt, E. A. [1924,1932] 1954. The Metaphysical Foundations of the Modern Sciences. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday/Anchor.Google Scholar
Castiglione, Baldesar. [1528] 1967. The Book of the Courtier, translated by Bull, George. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Charlton, D. G. 1984. New Images of the Natural in France: A Study in European Cultural History 1750–1800. Cambridge: Cambridge Universaty Press.Google Scholar
Condorcet, M. A. J. N. [1790] 1847–1849. “Sur l‘adrnission des femmes au droit de cité”. In Ouvres, 15 vols., edited by Condorcet-O'Connor, A and Arago, F.. Paris: Firmin Didot Fréres.Google Scholar
Cox, Catharine Morris. 1926. The Early Mental Traits of Three Hundred Geniuses. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. 1870. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex, 2 vols. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine. 1989. “Weibliche Intelligenz: Geschichte einer Idee”. In Jahrbuch des Wissenschaftskollegs zu Berlin 1987/88, edited by Lepenies, Wolf, 213–29. Berlin: Nicolaische Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine. 1992. “Baconian Facts, Academic Civility, and the Prehistory of Objectivity”. Annals of Scholarship 8.Google Scholar
Elena, Alberto. 1991. “In Lode della Filosofessa di Bologna‘: An Introduction to Laura Bassi”. Isis 82:510–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fausto-Sterling, Anne. 1985.Myths of Gender: Biological Theories about Women and Men. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Findlen, Paula.Forthcoming. “Science as a Career in Enlightenment Italy: The Strategies of Laura Bassi (1711–1778)”. In Gender and Scientific Patronage, edited by Abir-Am, Pnina, Outram, Dorinda, and Schiebinger, Londa. New Brunswick N.J: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Galton, Francis. [1869] 1972. Hereditary Genius: An Inquiry into Its Laws and Consequences. Gloucester, Mass: Peter Smith. Reprint of 2nd ed. of 1892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geddes, Patrick and Thomson, J. Arthur. [1889] 1901. The Evolution of Sex, rev. ed. London: Walter Scott.Google Scholar
Gierke, Otto. 1934. Natural Law and the Theory of Society 1500–1800, translated by Barker, Ernest. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay. 1981. The Mismeasure of Man. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Gournay, Marie de. 1622. Egalité des hommes et des femmes. N.pGoogle Scholar
Grafton, Anthony and Jardine, Lisa. 1981. From Humanism to the Humanities. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hippel, Theodor Gottlieb von. [ 1979. On Improving the Status of Women, translated and edited by Sellner, Timothy F.. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Paul. 1977. La Femme dans la pensée des lumières. Paris: Editions Ophrys.Google Scholar
d'Holbach, Baron Thierry. 1773. Système social, ou Principes naturels de la morale et de la politique avec un examen de l'influence du gouvernement sur les moeurs 3 vols. London.Google Scholar
Jordanova, Ludmilla. 1986. “Naturalizing the Family: Literature and Bio-Medical Sciences in the Late Eighteenth Century”. In Languages of Nature: Critical Essays on Science and Literature, edited by Jordanova, Ludmilla, 86–116. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
Jordanova, Ludmilla. 1989. Sexual Visions: Images of Gender in Science and Medicine between the Eighteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. [1764] 1968. Beobachtungen über das Gefühl des Schönen und Erhabenen. In Kants Werke, 9 vols., edited by the Königliche Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 2:205–56. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1985. Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kelso, Ruth. 1956. Doctrine for the Lady of the Renaissance. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Koyré, Alexandre. 1957. “The Significance of the Newtonian Synthesis”. In his Newtonian Studies, 3–24. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
La Bruyère, Jean de. [1688] 1693. Les Charactères de Théophraste traduits du Grec, avec les charactères ou les moeurs de ce siècle, 7th ed. Brussels.Google Scholar
Le Moyne, Pierre. 1660. La Gallerie des femmes fortes. Leyden: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G.E. R. 1966. Polarity and Analogy: Two Types of Argumentation in Early Greek Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G.E. R. 1983. Science, Folklore and Ideology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Geneviève. 1984. The Man of Reason. “Male” and “Female” in Western Philosophy. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Lombroso, Cesare. [1888] 1891. The Man of Genius. London.Google Scholar
Lougee, Carolyn C. 1976. La Paradis des Femmes. Women, Salons. and Social Stratitfication in Seventeenth-Century France. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Donald. 1981. Statistics in Britain 1865–1930: The Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Maclean, Ian. 1977. Woman Triumphant: Feminism in French Literature 1610–1652. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maclean, Ian. 1980. The Renaissance Notion of Woman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macoby, Eleanor. and Jacklin, Carol Nagy. [1966] 1974. The Psychology of Sex Differences. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. [1966] 1970. The Subjection of Women. In Essays on Sex Equality by John Stuart Mill and Harriet Taylor Mill, edited by Rossi, Alice S. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Moliere, [Jean-Baptiste Poquelin]. 1688. Las Femmes savantes. Paris: E. Michellet.Google Scholar
Olivier, Jacques [Alexis Rousset]. [1617” 1646. Alphabet de l'imperfection et malice des femmes, rev. ed. Rouen: lean Berthelin.Google Scholar
Peterson, Joseph. 1925. Early Conceptions and Tests of Intelligence. London: George G. Harrap.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilkington, A. E. 1986. “‘Nature’ as Ethical Norm in the Enlightenment”. In Languages of Nature: Critical Essays on Science and Literature, edited by Jordanova, Ludmilla, 51–85. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
Poullain de la Barre, François. [1673] 1984 De l'Egalité des deux sexes. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel. [1682]1734. Le Droit de la nature et des gens, ou Système général des principes les plus importans de la morale, de la jurisprudence, et de la politique, 2 vols., translated from Latin by Barbeyrac, Jean Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Pycior, Helena M. 1987. “Marie Curie's ‘Anti-natural Path’: Time Only for Science and Family”. In Uneasy Careers and Intimate Lives: Women in Science, 1789–1979, edited by Abir-Am, Pnina and Outram, Dorinda, 191–215. New Brunswick, N.J: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Reid, Thomas. [1785] 1969. Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man, edited by Brady, Baruch A. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. [1762] 1974. Emile, translated by Foxley, Barbara. London: Dent.Google Scholar
Roussel, Pierre. [1775] 1809. Système physique et moral de la femme, 5th ed. Paris.Google Scholar
Russet, Cynthia Eagle. 1989. Sexual Science: The Victorian Construction of Womanhood. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Saint-Gabriel, Sieur de. 1660. Le Mérite des dames, 3rd ed. Paris.Google Scholar
Schiebinger, Londa. 1986. “Skeletons in the Closet: The First Illustration of the Female Skeleton in Eighteenth-Century Anatomy”. Representations 14:42–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiebinger, Londa. 1989. The Mind Has No Sex? Women in the Origins of Modern Science. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schurman, Anna Maria von. 1641. Dissertatio, de ingenii mulieris ad doctrinam, & meliores litteras aptitudine. Lugd. Batavor: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven. 1988. “The House of Experiment in Seventeenth-Century England”. Isis 79:373–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapin, Steven. 1991. “‘A Scholar and a Gentleman’: The Problematic Identity of the Scientific Practitioner in Early Modern England”. History of Science 29:279–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slama, Béatrice. 1980. “Femmes écrivains”. In Misérable et glorieuse: La Femme du XIXe siècle, edited by Jean-Paul, Aron, 213–43. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Sokal, Michael. ed. 1987. Psychological Testing and American Society 1890–1930. New Brunswick, N.J: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert. [1855] 1966. The Principles of Psychology, 2 vols. Osnabrück: Otto Zeller. Reprint of 3rd ed. of 1899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, Herbert. 1873. “The Psychology of the Sexes”. Popular Science Monthly 4:30–38.Google Scholar
Taine, Hyppolyte. [1870] 1888. De l'Intelligence, 15th xed., 2 vols. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Tedesco, Marie. 1987. Science and Feminism: Conceptions of Female Intelligence and Their Effects on American Feminism, 1859–1920. Ph.D. diss., Georgia State UniversityGoogle Scholar
Terman, Lewis A., and Merrill, Maud A. [1916] 1937. Measuring Intelligence: A Guide to the Administration of the New Revised Stanford-Binet Tests of Intelligence. Cambridge, Mass: Riverside Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Antoine Léonard. 1772. Essai sur le caractère, les moeurs et l'esprit des femmes dans les différens siècles. Paris: Moutard.Google Scholar
Voltaire, François Arouet de. [1764] 1824. “Women”. In A Philosophical Dictionary, 2nd ed. London: John and Henry L. Hunt.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, Mary. [1792] 1982. A Vindication of the Rights of Woman: With Strictures on Political and Moral Subjects, edited by Hardt, Ulrich H. Troy, N.Y: Whiston.Google Scholar