Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T21:14:34.240Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Of Two Lives One? Jean-Charles-Marguerite-Guillaume Grimaud and the Question of Holism in Vitalist Medicine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2008

Elizabeth A. Williams
Elizabeth A. Williams*
Affiliation:
Oklahoma State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Argument

Montpellier vitalists upheld a medical perspective akin to modern “holism” in positing the functional unity of creatures imbued with life. While early vitalists focused on the human organism, Jean-Charles-Marguerite-Guillaume Grimaud investigated digestion, growth, and other physiological processes that human beings shared with simpler organisms. Eschewing modern investigative methods, Grimaud promoted a medically-grounded “metaphysics.” His influential doctrine of the “two lives” broke with Montpellier holism, classifying some vital phenomena as “higher” and others as “lower” and attributing the “nobility” of the human species to the predominance of the former. In place of Montpellier teaching that attributed health to the holistic equilibration of vital activities, Grimaud embraced spiritualist dualisms of soul and body, Creator and created. Celebrating the divinely-ordained “wisdom” evident in involuntary physiological processes, he argued that such life functions were incomprehensible to human investigators. While Grimaud's work encouraged inquiry into the division between the central and “vegetative” nervous systems that became paradigmatic in nineteenth-century neuroscience, it also opened Montpellier vitalism to charges of conservatism and obscurantism that are still lodged against it to the present day.

Type
Research Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , December 2008 , pp. 593 - 613
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barthez, Paul-Joseph. 1778. Nouveaux élémens de la science de l'homme. Montpellier: Jean Martel.Google Scholar
Bernier, Réjane. 1972. “La notion de principe vital chez Barthez: Essai historico-critique.” Archives de philosophie 35:423–41.Google Scholar
Bichat, Marie-François-Xavier. 1809. Physiological Researches Upon Life and Death. Philadelphia: Smith and Maxwell.Google Scholar
Bordeu, Théophile de. 1818a. “Recherches anatomiques sur la position des glandes, et sur leur action.” In Oeuvres complètes de Bordeu, 2 vols. Edited by Richerand, A.-B., vol. 1, 45–208. Paris: Caille et Ravier.Google Scholar
Bordeu, Théophile de. 1818b. “Recherches sur les maladies chroniques.” In Oeuvres complètes, vol. 2, 797–930.Google Scholar
Bordeu, Théophile de. 1818c. “Recherches sur le tissu muqueux.” In Oeuvres complètes, vol. 2, 735–96.Google Scholar
Bowling, Dale. 1997. “Corporeality and Corporatism in the Thought of Théophile de Bordeu.” Mid-America Conference on History (Stillwater, Oklahoma, September).Google Scholar
Clarke, Edwin, and Jacyna, L. S.. 1987. Nineteenth-Century Origins of Neuroscientific Concepts. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Delaporte, François. 1982. Nature's Second Kingdom: Explorations of Vegetality in the Eighteenth Century. Translated by Goldhammer, Arthur. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Duchesneau, François. 1982. La physiologie des Lumières: Empirisme, modèles et théories. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Duchesneau, François. 1985. “Vitalism in Late Eighteenth-Century Physiology: The Cases of Barthez, Blumenbach and John Hunter.” In William Hunter and the Eighteenth-Century Medical World. Edited by Bynum, W. F. and Porter, Roy, 259–95. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gershon, Michael. 1998. The Second Brain: The Scientific Basis of Gut Instinct and a Groundbreaking New Understanding of Nervous Disorders of the Stomach and Intestine. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Jan. 2005. The Post-revolutionary Self: Politics and Psyche in France, 1750–1850. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Grimaud, Jean-Charles-Marguerite-Guillaume. 1787. Mémoire sur la nutrition. Montpellier: J. Martel.Google Scholar
Grimaud, Jean-Charles-Marguerite-Guillaume. 1789. Second mémoire sur la nutrition. Supplément au Mémoire françois sur la nutrition. Montpellier: Jean Martel, 1789.Google Scholar
Grimaud, Jean-Charles-Marguerite-Guillaume. 1791. Cours complet de fièvres, 4 vols. Edited by Dumas, Charles-Louis. Montpellier: Jean-François Picot.Google Scholar
Grimaud, Jean-Charles-Marguerite-Guillaume. 1815. Cours de fièvres, 4 vols., 2nd edition. Edited by Demorcy-Delletre, J.-B.-E.. Montpellier: Veuve Picot.Google Scholar
Grimaud, Jean-Charles-Marguerite-Guillaume. 1818. Cours complet de physiologie, ouvrage posthume, 2 vols. Paris: Méquignon Marvis.Google Scholar
Grimaud, Jean-Charles-Marguerite-Guillaume. 1824. Cours complet de physiologie, distribué en leçons, ouvrage posthume, 2 vols., 2nd revised edition. Paris: Egron.Google Scholar
Gross, Michael. 1979. “The Lessened Locus of Feelings: A Transformation in French Physiology in the Early Nineteenth Century.” Journal of the History of Biology 12:231–71.Google Scholar
Haigh, Elizabeth. 1984. Xavier Bichat and the Medical Theory of the Eighteenth Century. London: Wellcome Institute for the History of Medicine.Google Scholar
Kass, Leon. 1994. The Hungry Soul: Eating and the Perfecting of Our Nature. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
LawrenceChristopher, and George Weisz Christopher, and George Weisz, eds. 1998. Greater than the Parts: Holism in Biomedicine, 1920–1950. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maulitz, Russell C. 1987. Morbid Appearances: The Anatomy of Pathology in the Early Nineteenth Century. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reich, Alisa. 1995. “Paul-Joseph Barthez and the Impact of Vitalism on Medicine and Psychology.” Ph.D. diss., University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Rey, Roselyne. 2000. Naissance et développement du vitalisme en France de la deuxième moitié du 18e siècle à la fin du Premier Empire. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation.Google Scholar
Roger, Jacques. 1997. Buffon: A Life in Natural History. Translated by Bonnefoi, Sarah Lucille. Edited by Pearce Williams, L.. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Steinke, Hubert. 2005. Irritating Concepts: Haller's Concept and the European Controversy on Irritability and Sensibility, 1750–90. Amsterdam: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, Keith. 1983. Man and the Natural World: A History of the Modern Sensibility. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Williams, Elizabeth A. 1994. The Physical and the Moral: Anthropology, Physiology, and Philosophical Medicine in France, 1750–1850. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Elizabeth A. 2003. A Cultural History of Medical Vitalism in Enlightenment Montpellier. Aldershot, U.K.: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Williams, Elizabeth A. Forthcoming. “Food and Feeling: Digestion, Emotion and the Nature of Morbidity.” In Vital Matters, edited by Deutsch, Helen and Terrall, Mary. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar