Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T09:38:23.048Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stabilizing American Society: Kenneth Boulding and the Integration of the Social Sciences, 1943–1980

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2010

Philippe Fontaine
Philippe Fontaine*
Affiliation:
École normale supérieure de Cachan and Institut universitaire de France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Argument

For more than thirty years after World War II, the unconventional economist Kenneth E. Boulding (1910–1993) was a fervent advocate of the integration of the social sciences. Building on common general principles from various fields, notably economics, political science, and sociology, Boulding claimed that an integrated social science in which mental images were recognized as the main determinant of human behavior would allow for a better understanding of society. Boulding's approach culminated in the social triangle, a view of society as comprised of three main social organizers – exchange, threat, and love – combined in varying proportions. According to this view, the problems of American society were caused by an unbalanced combination of these three organizers. The goal of integrated social scientific knowledge was therefore to help policy makers achieve the “right” proportions of exchange, threat, and love that would lead to social stabilization. Though he was hopeful that cross-disciplinary exchanges would overcome the shortcomings of too narrow specialization, Boulding found that rather than being the locus of a peaceful and mutually beneficial exchange, disciplinary boundaries were often the occasion of conflict and miscommunication.

Type
Research Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , June 2010 , pp. 221 - 265
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almond, Gabriel A. 1954. The Appeals of Communism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backhouse, Roger E. and Fontaine, Philippe. 2010. “Toward a History of the Social Sciences.” In The History of the Social Sciences since 1945, edited by Backhouse, Roger E. and Fontaine, Philippe, 184–233. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bannister, Robert C. 2003. “Sociology.” In The Cambridge History of Science. Volume 7: The Modern Social Sciences, edited by Porter, Theodore M. and Ross, Dorothy, 329–53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnard, Chester [1938] 1968. The Functions of the Executive. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S. 1957. The Economics of Discrimination. Chicago: University Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Daniel. 1960. The End of Ideology: On the Exhaustion of Political Ideas in the Fifties. Glencoe IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Michael A. 2001. A Perilous Progress: Economists and Public Purpose in Twentieth-Century America. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertalanffy, Ludwig von. 1953. “Philosophy of Science in Scientific Education.” Scientific Monthly 77:233–9.Google Scholar
Biddle, Jeff. 1996. “A Citation Analysis of the Sources and Extent of Wesley's Mitchell Reputation.” History of Political Economy 28:137–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulding, Kenneth E. 1941. Economic Analysis. New York and London: Harper.Google Scholar
Boulding, Kenneth E. 1945. The Economics of Peace. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Boulding, Kenneth E. 1948a. “Professor Tarshis and the State of Economics.” American Economic Review 38:92–102.Google Scholar
Boulding, Kenneth E. 1948b. “Samuelson's Foundations: The Role of Mathematics in Economics.” Journal of Political Economy 56:187–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulding, Kenneth E. [1949] 1968. “Is Economics Necessary?” Scientific Monthly 68:235–40. (Reprinted in Boulding 1968, 3–13).Google Scholar
Boulding, Kenneth E. 1950a. A Reconstruction of Economics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Boulding, Kenneth E. [1950b] 1968. “Religious Perspectives in Economics” (Reprinted in Boulding 1968, 179–97).Google Scholar
Boulding, Kenneth E. 1953. The Organizational Revolution: A Study in the Ethics of Economic Organization. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Boulding, Kenneth E. [1954] 1968. “The Principle of Personal Responsibility.” Review of Social Economy 12:1–8. (Reprinted in Boulding 1968, 212–18).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulding, Kenneth E. [1956] 1961. The Image: Knowledge in Life and Society. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulding, Kenneth E. 1957a. “The Parsonian Approach to Economics.” Kyklos 10:317–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulding, Kenneth E. [1957b] 1968. “Some Contributions of Economics to Theology and Religion.” Religious Education 52:446–50. (Reprinted in Boulding 1968, 219–26).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulding, Kenneth E. 1958a. “Review of Economy and Society.” American Journal of Sociology 63:427–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulding, Kenneth E. 1958b. The Skills of the Economist. Cleveland OH: Howard Allen.Google Scholar
Boulding, Kenneth E. 1962a. Conflict and Defense: A General Theory. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Boulding, Kenneth E. 1962b. “Notes on a Theory of Philanthropy.” In Philanthropy and Public Policy, edited by Dickinson, Frank, 57–71. New York: NBER.Google Scholar
Boulding, Kenneth E. [1962c] 1968. “Ethics and Business: An Economist's View.” (Reprinted in Boulding 1968, 227–38).Google Scholar
Boulding, Kenneth E. 1963. “Towards a Pure Theory of Threat Systems.” American Economic Review 53:424–34.Google Scholar
Boulding, Kenneth E. [1965a] 1968. “Economic Libertarianism.” (Reprinted in Boulding 1968, 43–54).Google Scholar
Boulding, Kenneth E. 1965b. “Great Society, or Grandiose?” The Washington Post,” 5 Dec.,E3.Google Scholar
Boulding, Kenneth E. 1966. The Impact of the Social Sciences. New Brunswick NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Boulding, Kenneth E. 1968. Beyond Economics: Essays on Society, Religion and Ethics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Boulding, Kenneth E. 1969. “Economics as a Moral Science.” American Economic Review 59:1–12.Google Scholar
Boulding, Kenneth E. 1970. A Primer on Social Dynamics: History as Dialectics and Development. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Boulding, Kenneth E. 1973. The Economy of Love and Fear: A Preface to Grants Economics. Belmont CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Boulding, Kenneth E. 1992a. “Kenneth E. Boulding.” In A Biographical Dictionary of Dissenting Economists, edited by Arestis, Philip and Sawyer, Malcolm, 45–54. Aldershot: Elgar.Google Scholar
Boulding, Kenneth E. 1992b. “From Chemistry to Economics and Beyond.” In Eminent Economists: Their Life Philosophies, edited by Szenberg, Michael, 69–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bowker, Geof. 1993. “How to be Universal: Some Cybernetic Strategies, 1943–70.” Social Studies of Science 23:107–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britt, Steuart Henderson and Morgan, Jane D.. 1946. “Military Psychologists in World War II.” American Psychologist 1:423–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buchanan, James M. and Tullock, Gordon. 1962. The Calculus of Consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Craig. 1992. “Sociology, Other Disciplines, and the Project of a General Understanding of Social Life.” In Sociology and Its Publics: The Forms and Fates of Disciplinary Organization, edited by Halliday, Terence C. and Janowitz, Morris, 137–95. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Camic, Charles. 1989. “Structure after 50 Years: The Anatomy of a Charter.” American Journal of Sociology 95:38–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capshew, James H. 1999. Psychologists on the March: Science, Practice, and Professional Identity in America, 1929–1969. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartwright, Dorwin. 1948. “Social Psychology in the United States during the Second World War.” Human Relations 1:333–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, I. Bernard. 1993. “Analogy, Homology, and Metaphor in the Interactions between the Natural Sciences and the Social Sciences, Especially Economics.” In Non-Natural Social Science: Reflecting on the Enterprise of More Heat than Light (Annual Supplement to vol. 25 of History of Political Economy), edited by de Marchi, Neil, 7–44. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen-Cole, Jamie. 2007. “Instituting the Science of Mind: Intellectual Economies and Disciplinary Exchange at Harvard's Center for Cognitive Studies.” British Journal for the History of Science 40:567–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cravens, Hamilton. 2004. “American Social Science and the Invention of Affirmative Action, 1920s-1970s.” In The Social Sciences Go to Washington: The Politics of Knowledge in the Postmodern Age, edited by Cravens, H., 9–40. New Brunswick NJ and London: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, Mark. 1983. Uncommon Sense: The Life and Thought of Ludwig von Bertalanffy, Father of General Systems Theory. Los Angeles: Tarcher.Google Scholar
Deutsch, Morton. 1949. “A Theory of Co-operation and Competition.” Human Relations 2:129–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimand, Robert W. 2005. “Experimental Economic Games: The Early Years.” In The Experiment in the History of Economics, edited by Fontaine, Philippe and Leonard, Robert, 5–24. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Emmett, Ross B. 1998. “Entrenching Disciplinary Competence: The Role of General Education and Graduate Study in Chicago Economics.” In From Interwar Pluralism to Postwar Neoclassicism (Annual Supplement to vol. 30 of History of Political Economy), edited by Morgan, Mary S. and Rutherford, Malcolm, 134–50. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Fontaine, Philippe. 2007. “From Philanthropy to Altruism: Incorporating Unselfish Behavior into Economics, 1961–1975.” History of Political Economy 39:1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frantilla, Anne. 1998. Social Science in the Public Interest: A Fiftieth-Year History of the Institute for Social Research. Ann Arbor: Bentley Historical Library.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton [1962] 1982. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton and Friedman, Rose D.. 1998. Two Lucky People: Memoirs. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Galison, Peter. 1994. “The Ontology of the Enemy: Norbert Wiener and the Cybernetic Vision.” Critical Inquiry 21:228–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glasgow, Robert W. 1973. “Aristocrats Have Always Been Sons of Bitches.” Psychology Today 6:61–4, 67–8, 70, and 86–7.Google Scholar
Graebner, William. 2004. “The End of Liberalism: Narrating Welfare's Decline, from the Moynihan Report (1965) to the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act (1996).” In The Social Sciences Go to Washington: The Politics of Knowledge in the Postmodern Age, edited by Cravens, Hamilton, 214–32. New Brunswick and London: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Grinker, Roy R., ed. 1956. Toward a Unified Theory of Human Behavior. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Hammond, Debora. 1995. “Perspectives from the Boulding Files.” Systems Research 12:281–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, Debora. 2003. The Science of Synthesis: Exploring the Social Implications of General Systems Theory. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
Hawley, Amos. H. 1944. “Ecology and Human Ecology.” Social Forces 22:398–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heims, Steve J. 1993. Constructing a Social Science for Postwar America: The Cybernetics Group, 1946–1953. Cambridge MA and London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Herman, Ellen. 1996. The Romance of American Psychology. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hollinger, David A. 1996. Science, Jews, and Secular Culture: Studies in Mid-Twentieth-Century American Intellectual History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelman, Herbert C. 1981. “Reflections on the History and Status of Peace Research.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 5:95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelman, Herbert C. 1991. “A Behavioral Science Perspective on the Study of War and Peace.” In Perspectives on Behavioral Science, edited by Jessor, Richard, 245–75. Boulder, San Francisco, and Oxford: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Kerman, Cynthia E. 1974. Creative Tension: The Life and Thought of Kenneth Boulding. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. Maynard. [1936] 1939. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Keyserling, Leon H. 1996. “Interview.” In The Coming of Keynesianism to America: Conversations with the Founders of Keynesian Economics, edited by Colander, David C. and Landreth, Harry. Cheltenham: Elgar.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Alfred. 1963. The Study of Society: A Unified Approach. Homewood IL: Irwin.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, Paul F. and Thielens, Wagner Jr. 1958. The Academic Mind: Social Scientists in a Time of Crisis. Glencoe IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Lewin, Kurt. [1939] 1951. “Field Theory and Experiment in Social Psychology.” In Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers by Kurt Lewin, edited by Cartwright, Dorwin, 130–154. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Lewin, Kurt. [1947] 1951. “Frontiers in Group Dynamics.” In Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers by Kurt Lewin, edited by Cartwright, Dorwin, 188–237. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Lowen, Rebecca. 1997. Creating the Cold War University: The Transformation of Stanford. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Miller, George A., Galanter, Eugene and Pribam, Karl H.. 1960. Plans and the Structure of Behavior. New York: Henry Holt.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirowski, Philip. 1991. “When Games Grow Deadly Serious: The Military Influence on the Evolution of Game Theory.” In Economics and National Security: A History of Their Interaction (Annual supplement to volume 23 of History of Political Economy), edited by Goodwin, Craufurd D., 227–55. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Mirowski, Philip, ed. 1993. Natural Images in Economic Thought: “Markets Read in Tooth and Claw.” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mirowski, Philip. 1999. “Cyborg Agonistes: Economics Meets Operation Research in Mid-Century.” Social Studies of Science 29:685–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirowski, Philip. 2002. Machine Dreams: Economics Becomes a Cyborg Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Mary S. and Rutherford, Malcolm. 1998. “American Economics: The Character of the Transformation.” Introduction to From Interwar Pluralism to Postwar Neoclassicism (Annual Supplement to vol. 30 of History of Political Economy), edited by Morgan, M. S. and Rutherford, M., 1–26. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Mott, Tracy. 1992. “Kenneth Boulding interviewed by Tracy Mott, 28–29 March 1991.” Review of Political Economy 4:341–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noyes, Reinold. 1948. Economic Man in Relation to His Natural Environment. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
O'Rand, Angela. 1992. “Mathematizing Social Science in the 1950s: The Early Development and Diffusion of Game Theory.” In Toward a History of Game Theory (Annual Supplement to vol. 24 of History of Political Economy), edited by Weintraub, E. Roy, 177–204. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Park, Robert E. 1943. “Education and the Cultural Crisis.” American Journal of Sociology 48:728–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Robert E. 1944. “Missions and the Modern World.” American Journal of Sociology 50:177–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, Talcott. 1948. “The Position of Sociological Theory.” American Sociological Review 13:156–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, Talcott and Barber, Bernard. 1948. “Sociology, 1941–46.” American Journal of Sociology 53:245–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, Talcott and Smelser, Neil J.. 1956. Economy and Society: A Study in the Integration of Economic and Social Theory. Glencoe IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Quinn, James A. 1940. “Topical Summary of Current Literature: On Human Ecology.” American Journal of Sociology 46:191–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raiffa, Howard. 1992. “Game Theory at the University of Michigan, 1948–1952.” In Toward a History of Game Theory (Annual Supplement to vol. 24 of History of Political Economy), edited by Weintraub, E. Roy, 165–75. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Rapoport, Anatol. 1960. Fights, Games, and Debates. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Rapoport, Anatol. 1997. “Memories of Kenneth E. Boulding.” Review of Social Economy 55:416–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapoport, Anatol. 2000. Certainties and Doubts: A Philosophy of Life. Montreal, New York, and London: Black Rose Books.Google Scholar
Reder, Melvin. 1982. “Chicago Economics: Permanence and Change.” Journal of Economic Literature 20:1–38.Google Scholar
Rizvi, S. Abu Turab. 2005. “Experimentation, General Equilibrium and Games.” In The Experiment in the History of Economics, edited by Fontaine, Philippe and Leonard, Robert, 50–70. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Robertson, Dennis. [1955] 1956. “What Does the Economist Economize?” In Economic Commentaries, 147–54. London: Staples Press.Google Scholar
Rutherford, Malcolm. 2004. “Institutional Economics at Columbia University.” History Political Economy 36:31–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. 1997. “Credo of a Lucky Textbook Author.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 11:153–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrecker, Ellen. 1986. No Ivory Tower: McCarthyism and the Universities. New York and Oxford: Oxford University University Press.Google Scholar
Shannon, J. B. 1953. Review of May's McCarthy: The Man, The Senator, the “Ism.” Journal of Politics 15:559–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shubik, Martin. 1992. “Game Theory at Princeton, 1949–1955: A Personal Reminiscence.” In Toward a History of Game Theory (Annual Supplement to vol. 24 of History of Political Economy), edited by Weintraub, E. Roy, 151–63. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Silk, Leonard. 1976. The Economists. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Skousen, Mark. 1997. “The Perseverance of Paul Samuelson's Economics.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 11:137–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Caleb. 1955. Review of The Goals of Economic Life and The Organizational Revolution. American Economic Review 45:149–54.Google Scholar
Sorensen, Ted. Counselor: A Life at the Edge of History. New York: Harper-Collins.Google Scholar
Stanley, Matthew. 2003. “‘An Expedition to Heal the Wounds of War’: The 1919 Eclipse and Eddington as Quaker Adventurer.” Isis 94:57–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stouffer, Samuel A. 1955. Communism, Conformity, and Civil Liberties. Garden City NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Tarshis, Lorie. 1947. The Elements of Economics. Boston: Houghton and Mifflin.Google Scholar
Thackray, Arnold. 1984. “CASBS: Notes Toward a History.” Annual Report 59–71.Google Scholar
Vipont, Elfrida. 1954. The Story of Quakerism, 1652–1952. London: Bannisdale Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Jessica. 1999. American Science in an Age of Anxiety: Scientists, Anticommunism, and the Cold War. Chapel Hill and London: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Wirth, Louis. 1945. “Human, Ecology.” American Journal of Sociology 50:483–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yonay, Yuval. 1998. The Struggle over the Soul of Economics: Institutionalist and Neoclassical Economists in American between the Wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar