Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T07:49:51.868Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The emergence of grammar in very-low-birth-weight Finnish children at two years of age*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2012

SUVI STOLT ,
JAAKKO MATOMÄKI ,
LEENA HAATAJA ,
HELENA LAPINLEIMU ,
LIISA LEHTONEN  and
the PIPARI STUDY GROUP
SUVI STOLT*
Affiliation:
University of Turku and Turku University Hospital
JAAKKO MATOMÄKI
Affiliation:
Turku University Hospital
LEENA HAATAJA
Affiliation:
Turku University Hospital
HELENA LAPINLEIMU
Affiliation:
Turku University Hospital
LIISA LEHTONEN
Affiliation:
Turku University Hospital
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Suvi Stolt, University of Turku, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Philosophy, Assistentinkatu 7, Publicum, 20014 Turku, Finland. tel. +358-2-3338786; e-mail: suvi.stolt@utu.fi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is not well understood how grammar emerges in very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) children. The main aim of the present study was to gain information on the emergence of grammar in this group at 2 ; 0. The Finnish version of the Communicative Development Inventory was used to collect data from VLBW children (N = 156) and full-term controls (N = 146). At a group level, the grammatical skills of the VLBW children were significantly weaker than those of the controls. However, when the effect of lexicon size and premature birth on the emergence of grammar was analyzed in detail, few significant differences were found between the groups. The results suggest that even though grammar emerges more slowly for the VLBW children, it emerges in a manner comparable to that of the controls, when the effect of lexicon size is taken into consideration.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , March 2013 , pp. 336 - 357
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

This study is part of the PIPARI study. The members of the PIPARI study group include Mikael Ekblad, Satu Ekblad, Eeva Ekholm, Leena Haataja, Mira Huhtala, Pentti Kero, Jarkko Kirjavainen, Riikka Korja, Harry Kujari, Helena Lapinleimu, Liisa Lehtonen, Marika Leppänen, Hanna Manninen, Jaakko Matomäki, Jonna Maunu, Petriina Munck, Pekka Niemi, Pertti Palo, Riitta Parkkola, Jorma Piha, Annika Lind, Liisi Rautava, Päivi Rautava, Hellevi Rikalainen, Katriina Saarinen, Elina Savonlahti, Matti Sillanpää, Suvi Stolt, Anniina Väliaho, Päivi Tuomikoski-Koiranen, Milla Ylijoki and Tuula Äärimaa. The present study was supported by the Academy of Finland. We would like to thank pyschologists Riikka Korja, Petriina Munck, Annika Lind and Anu Uschakoff, for assessing the cognitive development of the children.

References

REFERENCES

Anisfeld, M., Rosenberg, E., Hoberman, M. & Gasparini, D. (1998). Lexical acceleration coincides with the onset of combinatorial speech. First Language 18, 165–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, E., Dale, P. & Thal, D. (1995) Individual differences and their implications for theories of language development. In Fletcher, P. & MacWhinney, B. (eds.), The handbook of child language, 96–151. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bates, E. & Goodman, J. (1997). On the separability of grammar and the lexicon: Evidence from acquisition, aphasia and real-time processing. Language and Cognitive Processes 12 (5/6), 507–584.Google Scholar
Bates, E. & Goodman, J. (1999). On the emergence of grammar from the lexicon. In MacWhinney, B. (ed.), The emergence of language, 29–80. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bates, E., Marchman, V., Thal, D., Fenson, L., Dale, P., Reznick, S., Reilly, J. & Hartung, J. (1994). Developmental and stylistic variation in the composition of early vocabulary. Journal of Child Language 21, 85–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bayley, N. (1993). The Bayley Scales of Infant Development, 2nd edn.San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Bittner, D., Dressler, W. & Kilani-Schoch, M. (2003). Development of verb inflection in first language acquisition. A cross-linguistic perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caselli, M., Bates, E., Casadio, P., Fenson, J., Fenson, L., Sanderl, L. & Weir, J. (1995). A cross-linguistic study of early lexical development. Cognitive Development 10, 159–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caselli, C., Casadio, P. & Bates, E. (1999). A comparison of the transition from first words to grammar in English and Italian. Journal of Child Language 26, 69–111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conboy, B. & Thal, D. (2006). Ties between the lexicon and grammar: Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies of bilingual toddlers. Child Development 77, 712–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dasinger, L. (1997). Issues in the acquisition of Estonian, Finnish, and Hungarian: A crosslinguistic comparison. In Slobin, Dan (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, vol. 4, 87–182. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fenson, L., Dale, P., Reznick, J., Bates, E., Thal, D. & Pethick, S. (1994). Variability in early communicative development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 59 (5, Serial No. 242).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenson, L., Marchman, V., Thal, D., Dale, P., Reznick, J. S. & Bates, E. (2007). MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories. User's guide and technical manual, 2nd edn.Baltimore: Paul. H. Brookes Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Foster-Cohen, S., Edgin, J., Champion, P. & Woodward, L. (2007). Early delayed language development in very preterm infants: Evidence from the MacArthur-Bates CDI. Journal of Child Language 34, 655–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jansson-Verkasalo, E., Valkama, M., Vainionpää, E., Pääkkö, E., Ilkko, E. & Lehtihalmes, M. (2004). Language development in very low birth weight preterm children: A follow-up study. Phoniatrica et Logopedica 56, 108–119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kern, S. (2007). Influence of preterm birth on early lexical and grammatical acquisition. First Language 27(2), 159–73.Google Scholar
Laalo, K. (2002). Acquisition of case in Finnish: A preliminary overview. In Voeikova, M. & Dressler, W. (eds), Pre- and protomorphology. Early phases of morphological development in nouns and verbs. Vol. 29, Lincom Studies in Theoretical Linguistics, 83–103. Munchen: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Laalo, K. (2003). Early verb development in Finnish: A preliminary approach to miniparadigms. In Bittner, D., Dressler, W. & Kilani-Schoch, M. (eds), Development of verb inflection in first language acquisition, 323–50. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Luoma, L., Herrgård, E., Martikainen, A. & Ahonen, T. (1998). Speech and language development of children born at ⩽32 weeks' gestation: A 5-year prospective follow-up study. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology 40, 380–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyytinen, P. (1999). Varhaisen kommunikaation ja kielen kehityksen arviointimenetelmä. Jyväskylän yliopiston Lapsitutkimuskeskus ja Niilo Mäki instituutti. Jyväskylä: Niilo Mäki Säätiö.Google Scholar
Lyytinen, P., Poikkeus, A.-M., Leiwo, M., Ahonen, T. & Lyytinen, H. (1996). Parents as informants of their child's vocal and early language development. Early Child Development and Care 126, 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menyuk, P., Liebergott, J. & Schultz, M. (1995). Early language development in full-term and in premature infants. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Mikkola, K., Ritari, N., Tommiska, V., Salokorpi, T., Lehtonen, L., Tammela, O., Pääkkönen, L., Olsen, P., Korkman, M. & Fellman, V. (2005). Neurodevelopmental outcome at 5 years of age of a national cohort of extremely low birth weight infants who were born in 1996–1997. Pediatrics 116, 1391–1400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sansavini, A., Guarini, A., Alessandroni, R., Faldella, G., Giovanelli, G. & Salvioli, G. (2006). Early relations between lexical and grammatical development in very immature Italian preterms. Journal of Child Language 33, 199–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stolt, S., Haataja, L., Lapinleimu, H. & Lehtonen, L. (2009a). The early lexical acquisition and its predictive value to language skills at two years in very-low-birth-weight children. Journal of Communication Disorders 42, 107–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stolt, S., Haataja, L., Lapinleimu, H. & Lehtonen, L. (2009b) Associations between lexicon and grammar at the end of the second year in Finnish children. Journal of Child Language 36(4), 779–806.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stolt, S., Klippi, A., Launonen, K., Munck, P., Lehtonen, L., Lapinleimu, H., Haataja, L. and the PIPARI study group (2007). Size and composition of the lexicon in prematurely born-very-low-birth-weight and full-term Finnish children at two years of age. Journal of Child Language 34, 283–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stolt, S., Lehtonen, L., Haataja, L., Lapinleimu, H. & the PIPARI Study Group (2011). The early language used in mother–child interaction by prematurely born very-low-birth-weight children, with a focus on the emergence of grammar. Revista de Logopedia, Foniatría y Audiología 31(3), 115–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szagun, G., Steinbrink, C., Franik, M. & Stumper, B. (2006). Development of vocabulary and grammar in young German-speaking children assessed with a German language development inventory. First Language 26(3), 259–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thordardottir, E., Weismer, S. & Evans, J. (2002). Continuity in lexical and morphological development in Icelandic and English-speaking 2-year-olds. First Language 22, 2–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toivainen, J. (1997). The acquisition of Finnish. In Dan Slobin (ed.), The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition, vol. 4, 87–182. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Wolke, D., Samara, M., Bracewell, M. & Marlow, N. (2008). Specific language difficulties and school achievements in children born at 25 weeks of gestation or less. Journal of Pediatrics 152(2), 256–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolke, D. & Meyer, R. (1999). Cognitive status, language attainment, and prereading skills of 6-years-old very preterm children and their peers: The Bavarian Longitudinal Study. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology 41, 94–109.Google Scholar