Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T10:28:01.246Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cost-Effectiveness of Strategies to Prevent Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Transmission and Infection in an Intensive Care Unit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2015

Courtney A. Gidengil ,
Charlene Gay ,
Susan S. Huang ,
Richard Platt ,
Deborah Yokoe  and
Grace M. Lee
Courtney A. Gidengil*
Affiliation:
RAND Corporation, Boston, Massachusetts Division of Infectious Diseases, Boston Children’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
Charlene Gay
Affiliation:
Center for Child Health Care Studies, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
Susan S. Huang
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases and Health Policy Research Institute, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, California
Richard Platt
Affiliation:
Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
Deborah Yokoe
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
Grace M. Lee
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Boston Children’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts Center for Child Health Care Studies, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts Department of Laboratory Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
*
Address correspondence to Courtney A. Gidengil, MD, MPH, RAND Corporation, 20 Park Plaza, Suite 920, Boston, MA 02116 (gidengil@rand.org).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To create a national policy model to evaluate the projected cost-effectiveness of multiple hospital-based strategies to prevent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) transmission and infection.

DESIGN

Cost-effectiveness analysis using a Markov microsimulation model that simulates the natural history of MRSA acquisition and infection.

PATIENTS AND SETTING

Hypothetical cohort of 10,000 adult patients admitted to a US intensive care unit.

METHODS

We compared 7 strategies to standard precautions using a hospital perspective: (1) active surveillance cultures; (2) active surveillance cultures plus selective decolonization; (3) universal contact precautions (UCP); (4) universal chlorhexidine gluconate baths; (5) universal decolonization; (6) UCP + chlorhexidine gluconate baths; and (7) UCP+decolonization. For each strategy, both efficacy and compliance were considered. Outcomes of interest were: (1) MRSA colonization averted; (2) MRSA infection averted; (3) incremental cost per colonization averted; (4) incremental cost per infection averted.

RESULTS

A total of 1989 cases of colonization and 544 MRSA invasive infections occurred under standard precautions per 10,000 patients. Universal decolonization was the least expensive strategy and was more effective compared with all strategies except UCP+decolonization and UCP+chlorhexidine gluconate. UCP+decolonization was more effective than universal decolonization but would cost $2469 per colonization averted and $9007 per infection averted. If MRSA colonization prevalence decreases from 12% to 5%, active surveillance cultures plus selective decolonization becomes the least expensive strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

Universal decolonization is cost-saving, preventing 44% of cases of MRSA colonization and 45% of cases of MRSA infection. Our model provides useful guidance for decision makers choosing between multiple available hospital-based strategies to prevent MRSA transmission.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015;36(1): 17–27

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , January 2015 , pp. 17 - 27
Copyright
© 2015 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Presented in part: 48th Annual Meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America; Vancouver, British Columbia; October 21–24, 2010; abstract 426

References

REFERENCES

1. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004. Am J Infect Control 2004;32:470-485.Google Scholar
2.Klein, E, Smith, DL, Laxminarayan, R. Hospitalizations and deaths caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, United States, 1999-2005. Emerg Infect Dis 2007;13:1840–1846.Google Scholar
3.Huang, SS, Platt, R. Risk of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection after previous infection or colonization. Clin Infect Dis 2003;36:281–285.Google Scholar
4.Cosgrove, SE, Sakoulas, G, Perencevich, EN, Schwaber, MJ, Karchmer, AW, Carmeli, Y. Comparison of mortality associated with methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2003;36:53–59.Google Scholar
5.Engemann, JJ, Carmeli, Y, Cosgrove, SE, et al. Adverse clinical and economic outcomes attributable to methicillin resistance among patients with Staphylococcus aureus surgical site infection. Clin Infect Dis 2003;36:592–598.Google Scholar
6.Cosgrove, SE, Qi, Y, Kaye, KS, Harbarth, S, Karchmer, AW, Carmeli, Y. The impact of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia on patient outcomes: mortality, length of stay, and hospital charges. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2005;26:166–174.Google Scholar
7.Lodise, TP, McKinnon, PS. Clinical and economic impact of methicillin resistance in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2005;52:113–122.Google Scholar
8.Reed, SD, Friedman, JY, Engemann, JJ, et al. Costs and outcomes among hemodialysis-dependent patients with methicillin-resistant or methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2005;26:175–183.Google Scholar
9.McHugh, CG, Riley, LW. Risk factors and costs associated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2004;25:425–430.Google Scholar
10.Healthcare-Associated Infections - Healthy People. http://healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/overview.aspx?topicId=17. Accessed January 24, 2012.Google Scholar
11.Kim, JJ, Goldie, SJ. Health and economic implications of HPV vaccination in the United States. N Engl J Med 2008;359:821–832.Google Scholar
12.Smith, KJ, Wateska, AR, Nowalk, MP, Raymund, M, Nuorti, JP, Zimmerman, RK. Cost-effectiveness of adult vaccination strategies using pneumococcal conjugate vaccine compared with pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine. JAMA 2012;307:804–812.Google Scholar
13.Stout, NK, Rosenberg, MA, Trentham-Dietz, A, Smith, MA, Robinson, SM, Fryback, DG. Retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006;98:774–782.Google Scholar
14.Weinstein, M, Fineberg, H. Clinical Decision Analysis. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company, 1980.Google Scholar
15.Datta, R, Huang, SS. Risk of infection and death due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in long-term carriers. Clin Infect Dis 2008;47:176–181.Google Scholar
16.Huang, SS, Hinrichsen, VL, Datta, R, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection and hospitalization in high-risk patients in the year following detection. PLOS ONE 2011;6:e24340.Google Scholar
17.Analy$ource. 2011, First DataBank Inc., © (2011). Data accessed August 31, 2012.Google Scholar
18.Klevens, RM, Morrison, MA, Nadle, J, et al. Invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in the United States. JAMA 2007;298:1763–1771.Google Scholar
19.Hidron, AI, Edwards, JR, Patel, J, et al. NHSN annual update: antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections: annual summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006-2007. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29:996–1011.Google Scholar
20.The direct medical costs of healthcare-associated infections in US hospitals and the benefits of prevention. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2009. http://www.cdc.gov/hai/pdfs/hai/scott_costpaper.pdf.Google Scholar
21.Huskins, WC, Huckabee, CM, O'Grady, NP, et al. Intervention to reduce transmission of resistant bacteria in intensive care. N Engl J Med 2011;364:1407–1418.Google Scholar
22.Jain, R, Kralovic, SM, Evans, ME, et al. Veterans Affairs initiative to prevent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. N Engl J Med 2011;364:1419–1430.Google Scholar
23.Fraser, TG, Fatica, C, Scarpelli, M, et al. Decrease in Staphylococcus aureus colonization and hospital-acquired infection in a medical intensive care unit after institution of an active surveillance and decolonization program. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:779–783.Google Scholar
24.Robotham, JV, Graves, N, Cookson, BD, et al. Screening, isolation, and decolonisation strategies in the control of meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in intensive care units: cost effectiveness evaluation. BMJ 2011;343:d5694.Google Scholar
25.Huang, SS, Septimus, E, Kleinman, K, et al. Targeted versus universal decolonization to prevent ICU infection. N Engl J Med 2013;368:2255–2265.Google Scholar
26.Lee, BY, Singh, A, Bartsch, SM, et al. The potential regional impact of contact precaution use in nursing homes to control methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013;34:151–160.Google Scholar
27.Lee, BY, Wong, KF, Bartsch, SM, et al. The Regional Healthcare Ecosystem Analyst (RHEA): a simulation modeling tool to assist infectious disease control in a health system. JAMIA 2013;20:e139–e146.Google Scholar
28.Dantes, R, Mu, Y, Belflower, R, et al. National burden of invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections, United States, 2011. JAMA Intern Med 2013;173:1970–1978.Google Scholar
29.Epstein, L, Kallen, AJ, Bellflower, R, et al. Risk factors for invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection after discharge from acute-care hospitals - United States, 2011-2013. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 63rd Epidemic Intelligence Service Conference, 2014. Atlanta, GA; 2014.Google Scholar
30.Chaix, C, Durand-Zaleski, I, Alberti, C, Brun-Buisson, C. Control of endemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a cost-benefit analysis in an intensive care unit. JAMA 1999;282:1745–1751.Google Scholar
31.Kopp, BJ, Nix, DE, Armstrong, EP. Clinical and economic analysis of methicillin-susceptible and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Ann Pharmacother 2004;38:1377–1382.Google Scholar
32.Abramson, MA, Sexton, DJ. Nosocomial methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus primary bacteremia: at what costs? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999;20:408–411.Google Scholar
33.The cost of antibiotic resistance: effect of resistance among Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudmonas aeruginosa on length of hospital stay. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002;23:106–108.Google Scholar
34.Kaye, KS, Anderson, DJ, Sloane, R, et al. The effect of surgical site infection on older operative patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 2009;57:46–54.Google Scholar
35.Lilly, CM, Zuckerman, IH, Badawi, O, Riker, RR. Benchmark data from more than 240,000 adults that reflect the current practice of critical care in the United States. Chest 2011;140:1232–1242.Google Scholar
36.Dasta, JF, McLaughlin, TP, Mody, SH, Piech, CT. Daily cost of an intensive care unit day: the contribution of mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med 2005;33:1266–1271.Google Scholar
37.Paladino, JA, Poretz, D. Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy today. Clin Infect Dis 2010;51(Suppl 2):S198–S208.Google Scholar
38.Szumowski, JD, Cohen, DE, Kanaya, F, Mayer, KH. Treatment and outcomes of infections by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at an ambulatory clinic. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2007;51:423–428.Google Scholar
39.Machlin, S, Chowdhury, S. Statistical Brief #318: Expenses and characteristics of physician visits in different ambulatory care settings, 2008. AHRQ / MEPS Statistical Briefs. March 2011. http://www.meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/data_files/publications/st318/stat318.shtml. Accessed June 9, 2011.Google Scholar
40.Muto, CA, Giannetta, ET, Durbin, LJ, Simonton, BM, Farr, BM. Cost-effectiveness of perirectal surveillance cultures for controlling vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002;23:429–435.Google Scholar
41.Huang, SS, Yokoe, DS, Hinrichsen, VL, et al. Impact of routine intensive care unit surveillance cultures and resultant barrier precautions on hospital-wide methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis 2006;43:971–978.Google Scholar
42.Ellingson, K, Muder, RR, Jain, R, et al. Sustained reduction in the clinical incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization or infection associated with a multifaceted infection control intervention. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011;32:1–8.Google Scholar
43.Larson, E, Bobo, L, Bennett, R, et al. Lack of care giver hand contamination with endemic bacterial pathogens in a nursing home. Am J Infect Control 1992;20:11–15.Google Scholar
44.Pettinger, A, Nettleman, MD. Epidemiology of isolation precautions. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1991;12:303–307.Google Scholar
45.Ridenour, G, Lampen, R, Federspiel, J, Kritchevsky, S, Wong, E, Climo, M. Selective use of intranasal mupirocin and chlorhexidine bathing and the incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization and infection among intensive care unit patients. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007;28:1155–1161.Google Scholar
46.Jernigan, JA, Titus, MG, Groschel, DH, Getchell-White, S, Farr, BM. Effectiveness of contact isolation during a hospital outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Am J Epidemiol 1996;143:496–504.Google Scholar
47.Afif, W, Huor, P, Brassard, P, Loo, VG. Compliance with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus precautions in a teaching hospital. Am J Infect Control 2002;30:430–433.Google Scholar
48.Dedrick, RE, Sinkowitz-Cochran, RL, Cunningham, C, et al. Hand hygiene practices after brief encounters with patients: an important opportunity for prevention. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007;28:341–345.Google Scholar
49.Golan, Y, Doron, S, Griffith, J, et al. The impact of gown-use requirement on hand hygiene compliance. Clin Infect Dis 2006;42:370–376.Google Scholar
50.Weber, DJ, Sickbert-Bennett, EE, Brown, VM, et al. Compliance with isolation precautions at a university hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007;28:358–361.Google Scholar
51.Kim, PW, Roghmann, MC, Perencevich, EN, Harris, AD. Rates of hand disinfection associated with glove use, patient isolation, and changes between exposure to various body sites. Am J Infect Control 2003;31:97–103.Google Scholar
52.Climo, MW, Sepkowitz, KA, Zuccotti, G, et al. The effect of daily bathing with chlorhexidine on the acquisition of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus, and healthcare-associated bloodstream infections: results of a quasi-experimental multicenter trial. Crit Care Med 2009;37:1858–1865.Google Scholar
53.Wendt, C, Schinke, S, Wurttemberger, M, Oberdorfer, K, Bock-Hensley, O, von Baum, H. Value of whole-body washing with chlorhexidine for the eradication of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007;28:1036–1043.Google Scholar
54.Popovich, KJ, Hota, B, Hayes, R, Weinstein, RA, Hayden, MK. Effectiveness of routine patient cleansing with chlorhexidine gluconate for infection prevention in the medical intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2009;30:959–963.Google Scholar
55.Flayhart, D, Hindler, JF, Bruckner, DA, et al. Multicenter evaluation of BBL CHROMagar MRSA medium for direct detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from surveillance cultures of the anterior nares. J Clin Microbiol 2005;43:5536–5540.Google Scholar
56.Paule, SM, Mehta, M, Hacek, DM, Gonzalzles, TM, Robicsek, A, Peterson, LR. Chromogenic media vs real-time PCR for nasal surveillance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: impact on detection of MRSA-positive persons. Am J Clin Pathol 2009;131:532–539.Google Scholar
57.Huang, SS, Rifas-Shiman, SL, Warren, DK, et al. Improving methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus surveillance and reporting in intensive care units. J Infect Dis 2007;195:330–338.Google Scholar
58.Ridenour, GA, Wong, ES, Call, MA, Climo, MW. Duration of colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among patients in the intensive care unit: implications for intervention. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27:271–278.Google Scholar
59.Warren, DK, Guth, RM, Coopersmith, CM, Merz, LR, Zack, JE, Fraser, VJ. Epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization in a surgical intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27:1032–1040.Google Scholar
60.Clancy, M, Graepler, A, Wilson, M, Douglas, I, Johnson, J, Price, CS. Active screening in high-risk units is an effective and cost-avoidant method to reduce the rate of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in the hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27:1009–1017.Google Scholar
61.Patel, M, Weinheimer, JD, Waites, KB, Baddley, JW. Active surveillance to determine the impact of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization on patients in intensive care units of a Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29:503–509.Google Scholar
62.Robicsek, A, Beaumont, JL, Thomson, RB Jr., Govindarajan, G, Peterson, LR. Topical therapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization: impact on infection risk. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2009;30:623–632.Google Scholar
63.Robicsek, A, Beaumont, JL, Paule, SM, et al. Universal surveillance for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in 3 affiliated hospitals. Ann Intern Med 2008;148:409–418.Google Scholar
64.Fishbain, JT, Lee, JC, Nguyen, HD, et al. Nosocomial transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a blinded study to establish baseline acquisition rates. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2003;24:415–421.Google Scholar
65.Muller, A, Talon, D, Potier, A, Belle, E, Cappelier, G, Bertrand, X. Use of intranasal mupirocin to prevent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in intensive care units. Crit Care 2005;9:R246–R250.Google Scholar
66.Kim, T, Oh, PI, Simor, AE. The economic impact of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Canadian hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2001;22:99–104.Google Scholar
67.Muder, RR, Wagener, MM, Yu, VL. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in nursing homes. Ann Intern Med 1992;116:267.Google Scholar
68.Ben-David, D, Novikov, I, Mermel, LA. Are there differences in hospital cost between patients with nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection and those with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus bloodstream infection? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2009;30:453–460.Google Scholar
69.Shorr, AF, Tabak, YP, Gupta, V, Johannes, RS, Liu, LZ, Kollef, MH. Morbidity and cost burden of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in early onset ventilator-associated pneumonia. Crit Care 2006;10:R97.Google Scholar
70.Ibelings, MM, Bruining, HA. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: acquisition and risk of death in patients in the intensive care unit. Eur J Surg 1998;164:411–418.Google Scholar