Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T05:53:51.970Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

State Support for Audiovisual Products in the World Trade Organization: Protectionism or Cultural Policy?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2007

Tania Voon
Tania Voon
Affiliation:
Senior Lecturer, University of Melbourne Law School; former Legal Officer, Appellate Body Secretariat, World Trade Organization; Fellow, Tim Fischer Centre for Global Trade & Finance. Email: tania.voon@unimelb.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The failure to agree on the treatment of audiovisual products in the Uruguay Round led to an unsatisfactory result for all World Trade Organization (WTO) members. Yet a balanced evaluation of the arguments on both sides demonstrates that the stalemate need not continue indefinitely. The audiovisual industry is a business, but audiovisual products have cultural features that distinguish them from other tradeable goods and services. If members see local audiovisual products as a means of communication among their people, or if they do not wish to stifle creativity, free speech, or the progressive development of culture, they may need to support local audiovisual products in a manner that discriminates expressly against foreign products. The same cannot be said of discrimination between foreign audiovisual products. If a member wishes to extend benefits to audiovisual products from countries with cultures similar to its own, it can do so by adopting objective criteria, such as language to distinguish between the relevant products. Cultural policy measures in relation to audiovisual products should be the least trade-restrictive necessary to achieve their objectives.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: For helpful comments on an earlier version of this article, I thank Dr. Roger O'Keefe, Justin Fung, Alison Lam, Dr. Andrew Mitchell, Matthew Stilwell, and anonymous referees. All errors and omissions, as well as the opinions expressed here, are mine.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Cultural Property , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , May 2006 , pp. 129 - 160
Copyright
© 2006 International Cultural Property Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acheson, Keith, and Christopher Maule. “Canada—Audio-Visual Policies: Impact on Trade.” In Cultural Diversity and International Economic Integration: The Global Governance of the Audio-Visual Sector, edited by Paolo Guerrieri, Lelio Iapadre and Georg Koopman, 156. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2005.
Acheson, Keith, and Christopher Maule. “Convention on Cultural Diversity.” Journal of Cultural Economics 28 (2004): 243.Google Scholar
Acheson, Keith, and Christopher Maule. Much Ado About Culture: North American Trade Disputes. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1999.
Appadurai, Arjun. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1996.
Australian Broadcasting Authority. “Trade Liberalisation in the Audiovisual Services Sector and Safeguarding Cultural Diversity.” Working paper, commissioned by the Asia-Pacific Broadcasting Union, July 1999.
Australian Department of Communications Information Technology and the Arts. “Australian Report on Overseas Markets for Creative Industry.” December 12, 2003.
Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. “Australian Intervention on Negotiating Proposal on Audiovisual Services: Council for Trade in Services Special Session.” July 2001.
Baker, Edwin. “An Economic Critique of Free Trade in Media Products.” North Carolina Law Review 78 (2000): 1357.Google Scholar
Baumol, William. “Applied Welfare Economics.” In A Handbook of Cultural Economics, edited by Ruth Towse, 20. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2003.
Bernier, Ivan, and Hélène Ruiz Fabri. Évaluation de la faisabilité juridique d'un instrument international sur la diversité culturelle. 2002.
Bernier, Ivan. “Cultural Goods and Services in International Trade Law.” In The Culture/Trade Quandary: Canada's Policy Options, edited by Dennis Browne, 108. Ottawa, Canada: Centre for Trade Policy and Law, 1998.
Cameron, Sam. “Cinema.” In A Handbook of Cultural Economics, edited by Ruth Towse, 114. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2003.
Canadian Department of Communications. Report of the Federal Cultural Policy Review Committee. Ottawa, Canada, 1982.
Canadian Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade, Cultural Industries Sectoral Advisory Group on International Trade. An International Agreement on Cultural Diversity: A Model for Discussion. September 2002.
Canoy, Marcel, Jan van Ours, and Frederick van der Ploeg. “The Economics of Books.” Working paper 1414, Center for Economic Studies and Institute for Economic Research, 2005.
Carniaux, Anton. “L'audiovisuel dans les accords internationaux favorisant le libre-échange: Des problèmes économiques et culturels difficiles à négocier.” Revue générale de droit 26 (1995): 455.Google Scholar
Cass, Ronald, and Richard Boltuck. “Antidumping and Countervailing-Duty Law: The Mirage of Equitable International Competition.” In Fair Trade and Harmonization: Prerequisites for Free Trade? edited by Jagdish Bhagwati and Robert Hudec, 351. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996.
Caves, Richard. Creative Industries: Contracts between Art and Commerce. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000.
Caves, Richard. International Trade, International Investment and Imperfect Markets. Special Papers in International Economics No. 10, Princeton: Princeton University Press, November 1974.
Cocq, Emmanuel, and Patrick Messerlin. “French Audio-Visual Policy: Impact and Compatibility with Trade Negotiations.” In Cultural Diversity and International Economic Integration: The Global Governance of the Audio-Visual Sector, edited by Paolo Guerrieri, Lelio Iapadre and Georg Koopman, 21. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2005.
Coe, Neil, and Jennifer Johns. “Production Clusters: Towards a Critical Political Economy of Networks in the Film and Television Industries.” In Cultural Industries and the Production of Culture, edited by Dominic Power and Allen Scott, 188. London: Routledge, 2004.
Condron, Anne Marie. “Cinema.” In Aspects of Contemporary France, edited by Sheila Perry, 209. London: Routledge, 1997.
Cowen, Tyler. Creative Destructions: How Globalization is Reshaping World Cultures. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002.
Croome, John. Reshaping the World Trading System: A History of the Uruguay Round, 2nd rev. ed. The Hague: Kluwer, 1999.
de Rivery, Eric Morgan. “Unresolved Issues in the Audiovisual Sector and the US/EC Conflict.” In The Uruguay Round Results: A European Lawyers' Perspective, edited by Jacques Bourgeois, Frédérique Berrod and Eric Gippini Fournier, 435. Brussels: European Interuniversity Press, 1995.
Drake, William, and Kalypso Nicolaïdis. “Global Electronic Commerce and GATS: The Millennium Round and Beyond.” In GATS 2000: New Directions in Services Trade Liberalization, edited by Pierre Sauvé and Robert Stern, 399. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press/Harvard University Center for Business and Government, 2000.
Echols, Marsha. Food Safety and the WTO: The Interplay of Culture, Science and Technology. London: Kluwer, 2001.
Eröcal, Deniz. Case Studies of Successful Companies in the Services Sector and Lessons for Public Policy. DSTI/DOC(2005)7, OECD Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry Working Paper 2005/7, June 15, 2005.
Ezetah, Chinedu. “Patterns of an Emergent World Trade Organization Legalism: What Implications for NAFTA Cultural Exemption?” World Competition 21 (1998): 93.Google Scholar
Falkenberg, Karl. “The Audiovisual Sector.” In The Uruguay Round Results: A European Lawyers' Perspective, edited by Jacques Bourgeois, Frédérique Berrod and Eric Gippini Fournier, 429. Brussels: European Interuniversity Press, 1995.
Feketekuty, Geza. “Regulatory Reform and Trade Liberalization in Services.” In GATS 2000: New Directions in Services Trade Liberalization, edited by Pierre Sauvé and Robert Stern, 225. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press/Harvard University Center for Business and Government, 2000.
Feldthusen, Bruce. “Awakening from the National Broadcasting Dream: Rethinking Television Regulation for National Cultural Goals.” In The Beaver Bites Back? American Popular Culture in Canada, edited by David Flaherty and Frank Manning, 42. Montreal, Canada: McGill-Queen's University Press, 1993.
Footer, Mary. “The General Agreement on Trade in Services: Taking Stock and Moving Forward.” Legal Issues of Economic Integration 29 (2002): 7.Google Scholar
Footer, Mary, and Graber, Christoph. “Trade Liberalization and Cultural Policy.” Journal of International Economic Law 3 (2000): 115.Google Scholar
French, Shaun, Louise Crewe, Andrew Leyshon, Peter Webb, and Nigel Thrift. “Putting E-commerce in Its Place: Reflections on the Impact of the Internet on the Cultural Industries.” In Cultural Industries and the Production of Culture, edited by Dominic Power and Allen Scott, 54. London: Routledge, 2004.
Frey, Bruno. “Creativity, Government and the Arts.” De Economist 150 (2002): 363.Google Scholar
Frey, Bruno. “Public Support.” In A Handbook of Cultural Economics, edited by Ruth Towse, 389. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2003.
Gagné, Gilbert. “Une Convention internationale sur la diversité culturelle et le dilemme culture-commerce.” In La diversité culturelle: Vers une convention internationale effective? edited by Gilbert Gagné, 37. Saint-Laurent: Fides, 2005.
Galperin, Herman. “Cultural Industries Policy in Regional Trade Agreements: The Cases of NAFTA, the European Union and MERCOSUR.” Media, Culture & Society 21 (1999): 627.Google Scholar
General Agreement on Tariffs, and Trade, Trade Negotiations Committee. Uruguay Round—Trade Negotiations Committee Meeting. NUR 077, November 26, 1993.
General Agreement on Tariffs, and Trade, Uruguay Round Group of Negotiations on Services. Working Group on Audiovisual Services—Matters Relating to Trade in Audiovisual Services: Note by the Secretariat. MTN.GNS/AUD/W/1, October 4, 1990.
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. Application of GATT to International Trade in Television Programmes: Report of the Working Party. L/1741, March 13, 1962.
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. Peter Sutherland Responds to Debate on Audiovisual Sector. NUR 069, October 14, 1993.
Ghertman, Michel, and Allègre Hadida. “Institutional Assets and Competitive Advantage of French over U.S. Cinema: 1895–1914.” International Studies of Management and Organization 35 (2005): 50.Google Scholar
Ghoneim, Ahmed Farouk. “The Audio-Visual Sector in Egypt.” In Cultural Diversity and International Economic Integration: The Global Governance of the Audio-Visual Sector, edited by Paolo Guerrieri, Lelio Iapadre and Georg Koopman, 192. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2005.
Gibson, Chris, and John Connell. “Cultural Industry Production in Remote Places: Indigenous Popular Music in Australia.” In Cultural Industries and the Production of Culture, edited by Dominic Power and Allen Scott, 243. London: Routledge, 2004.
Graber, Christoph. “WTO: A Threat to European Films?” Paper presented at the Conference on European Culture, University of Navarra, Pamplona, October 28–31, 1991.
Graber, Christoph. Handel und Kultur im Audiovisionsrecht der WTO: Völkerrechtliche, ökonomische und kulturpolitische Grundlagen einer globalen Medienordnung. Bern: Stämpfli Verlag, 2003.
Grant, Peter, and Chris Wood. Blockbusters and Trade Wars: Popular Culture in a Globalized World. Vancouver, Canada: Douglas & McIntyre, 2004.
Held, David, Anthony McGrew, David Goldblatt, and Jonathan Perraton. Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1999.
Howse, Robert. “Managing the Interface between International Trade Law and the Regulatory State: What Lessons Should (and Should Not) Be Drawn from the Jurisprudence of the United States Dormant Commerce Clause.” In Regulatory Barriers and the Principle of Non-Discrimination in World Trade Law, edited by Thomas Cottier and Petros Mavroidis, 139. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2000.
Hudec, Robert. “Tiger Tiger, in the House: A Critical Appraisal of the Case Against Discriminatory Trade Measures.” In Essays on the Nature of International Trade Law, edited by Robert Hudec, 281. London: Cameron May, 1999.
International Network for Cultural Diversity. Proposed Convention on Cultural Diversity. January 15, 2003.
International Network on Cultural Policy. Draft International Convention on Cultural Diversity, July 29, 2003.
Jackson, John. World Trade and the Law of the GATT (A Legal Analysis of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade). Charlottesville, NC: The Michie Company, 1969.
Kaul, Inge, Isabelle Grunberg, and Marc Stern. “Defining Global Public Goods.” In Global Public Goods: International Cooperation in the 21st Century, edited by Inge Kaul, Isabelle Grunberg and Marc Stern, 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Kim, Joongi. “The Viability of Screen Quotas in Korea: The Cultural Exception under the International Trade Regime.” Korean Journal of International and Comparative Law 26 (1998): 199.Google Scholar
Krajewski, Marcus. National Regulation and Trade Liberalization in Services: The Legal Impact of the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) on National Regulatory Autonomy. The Hague: Kluwer, 2003.
Mas-Colell, Andreu. “Should Cultural Goods be Treated Differently?” Journal of Cultural Economics 23 (1999): 87.Google Scholar
Mattera, A. “L'Union européenne assure le respect des identités nationales, régionales et locales, en particulier par l'application et la mise en œuvre du principe de la reconnaissance mutuelle (un article 12A à introduire dans le future traité?).” Revue Du Droit de l'Union Européenne 2 (2002): 217.Google Scholar
Messerlin, Patrick. “France and Trade Policy: Is the ‘French Exception’ Passé?” International Affairs 72 (1996): 293.Google Scholar
Messerlin, Patrick. “Regulating Culture: Has it ‘Gone with the Wind’?” Paper presented at the Productivity Commission and Australian National University (Joint Conference) on Achieving Better Regulation of Services, Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, June 26–27, 2000.
Messerlin, Patrick, and Emmanuel Cocq. “Preparing Negotiations in Services: EC Audiovisuals in the Millennium Round.” Paper presented at the World Services Congress on Services: Generating Global Growth and Opportunity, Atlanta, GA, November 1–3, 1999.
Mukherjee, Arpita. “Audio-Visual Policies and International Trade: The Case of India.” In Cultural Diversity and International Economic Integration: The Global Governance of the Audio-Visual Sector, edited by Paolo Guerrieri, Lelio Iapadre and Georg Koopman, 218. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2005.
Nielson, Julia, and Daria Taglioni. Services Trade Liberalisation: Identifying Opportunities and Gains. OECD Trade Policy Working Paper 1, 2004.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Working Party on the Information Economy. Digital Broadband Content: Music. DSTI/ICCP/IE(2004)12/FINAL, June 8, 2005.
Perino, Grischa, and Günther Schulze. “Competition, Cultural Autonomy and Global Governance: The Audio-Visual Sector in Germany.” In Cultural Diversity and International Economic Integration: The Global Governance of the Audiovisual Sector, edited by Paolo Guerrieri, Lelio Iapadre and Georg Koopmann. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2005.
Pignataro, Giacomo. “Imperfect Information and Cultural Goods: Producers' and Consumers' Inertia.” In Cultural Economics and Cultural Policies, edited by Alan Peacock and Ilde Rizzo, 55. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer, 1994.
Power, Dominic, and Daniel Hallencreutz. “Profiting from Creativity? The Music Industry in Stockholm, Sweden and Kingston, Jamaica.” In Cultural Industries and the Production of Culture, edited by Dominic Power and Allen Scott, 224. London: Routledge, 2004.
Prott, Lyndel. “International Standards for Cultural Heritage.” In World Culture Report: Culture, Creativity and Markets, edited by UNESCO, 222. Paris: UNESCO, 1998.
Redner, Harry. Conserving Cultures: Technology, Globalization, and the Future of Local Cultures. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004.
Richardson, Bonnie. “Hollywood's Vision of a Clear, Predictable Trade Framework Consistent with Cultural Diversity.” In Free Trade versus Cultural Diversity: WTO Negotiations in the Field of Audiovisual Services, edited by Christoph Graber, Michael Girsburger and Mira Nenova, 111. Zurich, Switzerland: Schulthess, 2004.
Sandler, Todd. “Intergenerational Public Goods: Strategies, Efficiency and Institutions.” In Global Public Goods: International Cooperation in the 21st Century, edited by Inge Kaul, Isabelle Grunberg and Marc Stern, 20. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Sauvé, Pierre, and Karsten Steinfatt. “Towards Multilateral Rules on Trade and Culture: Protective Regulation or Efficient Protection?” In Achieving Better Regulation of Services, edited by the Productivity Commission. 2001.
Schulze, Günther. “International Trade in Art.” Journal of Cultural Economics 23 (1999): 109.Google Scholar
Schulze, Günther. “International Trade.” In A Handbook of Cultural Economics, edited by Ruth Towse, 269. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2003.
Serageldin, Ismail. “Cultural Heritage As Public Good: Economic Analysis Applied to Historic Cities.” In Global Public Goods: International Cooperation in the 21st Century, edited by Inge Kaul, Isabelle Grunberg and Marc Stern, 240. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Sykes, Alan. “Comparative Advantage and the Normative Economics of International Trade Policy.” Journal of International Economic Law 1 (1998): 49.Google Scholar
Sykes, Alan. “The Least Restrictive Means.” University of Chicago Law Review 70 (2003): 403.Google Scholar
Throsby, David. Economics and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
Towse, Ruth. “Cultural Industries.” In A Handbook of Cultural Economics, edited by Ruth Towse, 170. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2003.
Trachtman, Joel. “Trade and … Problems, Cost-Benefit Analysis and Subsidiarity.” European Journal of International Law 9 (1998): 32.Google Scholar
Trebilcock, Michael, and Robert Howse. The Regulation of International Trade, 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 1999.
Trebilcock, Michael, and Robert Howse. The Regulation of International Trade, 3rd ed. London: Routledge, 2005.
United Nations, Commission on Human Rights. Promotion of the Enjoyment of the Cultural Rights of Everyone and Respect for Different Cultural Identities. E/CN.4/RES/2002/26, April 22, 2002.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development and World Bank. Liberalizing International Transactions in Services: A Handbook. New York, Geneva: United Nations, 1994.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. General Conference. Preliminary Report by the Director-General Setting Out the Situation to be Regulated and the Possible Scope of the Regulating Action Proposed, Accompanied by the Preliminary Draft of a Convention on the Protection and of the Diversity of Cultural Contents and Artistic Expressions. 33 C/23, August 4, 2005.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. “General Conference Adopts Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions.” Press Release 2005–128, October 20, 2005.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions. CLT-2005/CONVENTION DIVERSITE-CULT REV. Paris: UNESCO, October 20, 2005.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Culture, Trade and Globalization: Questions and Answers. Paris: UNESCO, 2000.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. General Conference Adopts Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity. Press Release 2001–120, November 2, 2001.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Records of the General Conference, 31st Session, Vol I: Resolutions. Paris: UNESCO, October 15 to November 3, 2001.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. UNESCO and the Issue of Cultural Diversity: Review and strategy, 1946–2004, rev. ed. Paris: UNESCO, September 2004.
Verhoosel, Gaëtan. National Treatment and WTO Dispute Settlement: Adjudicating the Boundaries of Regulatory Autonomy. Oxford: Hart, 2002.
Voon, Tania. “UNESCO and the WTO: A Clash of Cultures?” International & Comparative Law Quarterly 55 (2006): 635.Google Scholar
Voon, Tania. Cultural Products and the World Trade Organization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming.
Withers, Glenn. “Broadcasting.” In A Handbook of Cultural Economics, edited by Ruth Towse, 102. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2003.
World Trade Organization, Council for Trade in Services. Audiovisual Services: Background Note by the Secretariat. S/C/W/40, Geneva: WTO, June 15, 1998.
World Trade Organization, Council for Trade in Services. Communication from Brazil—Audiovisual Services. S/CSS/W/99, Geneva: WTO, July 9, 2001.
World Trade Organization, Council for Trade in Services. Communication from Canada: Initial Canadian Negotiating Proposal. S/CSS/W/46 and Corr. 1, Geneva: WTO, March 14, 2001.
World Trade Organization, Council for Trade in Services. Communication from Hong Kong China, Japan, Mexico, the Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu, and United States: Joint Statement on the Negotiations on Audiovisual Services. TN/S/W/49, Geneva: WTO, June 30, 2005.
World Trade Organization, Council for Trade in Services. Communication from Japan: The Negotiations on Trade in Services. S/CSS/W/42, December 22, 2000.
World Trade Organization, Council for Trade in Services. Communication from Switzerland—GATS 2000: Audiovisual Services. S/CSS/W/74, Geneva: WTO, May 4, 2001.
World Trade Organization, Council for Trade in Services. Communication from the United States—Audiovisual and Related Services. S/CSS/W/21, Geneva: WTO, December 18, 2000.
World Trade Organization, Council for Trade in Services. Guidelines and Procedures for the Negotiations on Trade in Services. S/L/93, Geneva: WTO, March 29, 2001.
World Trade Organization, Council for Trade in Services. Report of the Meeting Held on 25 February 2000: Note by the Secretariat. S/C/M/41, Geneva: WTO, April 3, 2000.
World Trade Organization, Council for Trade in Services. Report of the Meeting Held on 27 and 30 June and 1 July 2005: Note by the Secretariat. TN/S/M/15, Geneva: WTO, September 15, 2005.
World Trade Organization, Council for Trade in Services. Special Session—Report of the Meeting Held on 28, 29 and 30 March 2001: Note by the Secretariat. S/CSS/M/8, Geneva: WTO, May 14, 2001.
World Trade Organization, General Council. Decision Adopted by the General Council on 1 August 2004. WT/L/579, Geneva: WTO, August 2, 2004.
World Trade Organization, Ministerial Conference. Doha Work Programme: Ministerial Declaration Adopted on 18 December 2005. WT/MIN(05)/DEC, Geneva: WTO, December 22, 2005.
World Trade Organization, Ministerial Conference. Doha Work Programme: Ministerial Declaration Adopted on 18 December 2005. WT/MIN(05)/DEC, Geneva: WTO, December 22, 2005.
World Trade Organization, Ministerial Conference. Ministerial Declaration adopted on 14 November 2001. WT/MIN(01)/DEC/1, Geneva: WTO, November 20, 2001.
World Trade Organization. Working Party on Domestic Regulation. Necessity Tests in the WTO: Note by the Secretariat. S/WPDR/W/27, Geneva: WTO, December 2, 2003.
World Trade Organization. Working Party on Domestic Regulation. Report by the Chairman of the Trade Negotiations Committee to the General Council. TN/C/5, Geneva: WTO, July 28, 2005.
World Trade Organization. Working Party on Domestic Regulation. Trade Policy Review, Canada: Report by the Secretariat. WT/TPR/S/78, Geneva: WTO, November 15, 2000.
World Trade Organization. Working Party on Domestic Regulation. World Trade Report 2004: Exploring the Linkage between the Domestic Policy Environment and International Trade. Geneva: WTO, 2004.
Wunsch-Vincent, Sacha. The WTO, the Internet and Trade in Digital Products: EC-US Perspectives. Oxford: Hart, 2006.