Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-r7xzm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T12:17:43.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thematic Concepts: Where Philosophy Meets Literature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2010

Extract

In Euripides' Hippolytus, Phaedra, wife of Theseus, king of Athens, falls in love with the unsuspecting Hippolytus, Theseus' son by the amazon Antiope. Phaedra's passion is the work of the goddess Aphrodite, who wants to revenge herself on Hippolytus because he has rejected her and devoted himself to the chaste Artemis. Through Paedra's nurse Hippolytus is made aware of her love and invited to her bed. He emphatically rejects her offer and violently abuses Phaedra and her nurse. To save her honour Phaedra commits suicide and leaves a note accusing Hippolytus of raping her. Theseus, confronted on his return from an expedition with the suicide and the note, banishes Hippolytus and prays to his father, the seagod Poseidon, to fulfil one of the three wishes he has granted him and kill Hippolytus. Leaving Troezen, Hippolytus is killed when his horses are frightened by a monster thrown on shore by Poseidon from a giant wave. Theseus is brought to realize his mistake by the goddess Artemis who appears to him and reveals the truth. The play ends with the reconciliation of Theseus and the dying Hippolytus. This, in bare outline, is what happens in the play. It is what might be called its subject. The play is about these events and characters. Now it is also possible to give another type of description of Euripides' play. For the play does not merely have a subject but also a theme. While it is straightforward and unproblematic to give a description of the subject of the play a statement of its theme presents difficulties. The subject is, in an obvious sense, given for any competent speaker of the language in which the work is written. The theme, on the other hand, emerges from the subject in conjunction with other features of the work, and it emerges through the reader's constructive labour. There is no theme for the reader who is unwilling or unable to engage in this constructive labour.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Trans. Grene, David in Euripides I. The Complete Greek Tragedies, Grene, David and Lattimore, Richmond (eds) (Chicago, 1955)Google Scholar. All quotations from this edition.

2 Mankowitz, Wolf, ‘The Songs of Experience’, Politics and Letters (1947)Google Scholar; reprinted in Bottrall, Margaret (ed.), ‘Songs of Innocence and Experience.’ A Casebook (London 1970), 127128.Google Scholar

3 I have recently come to suspect that this argument has a much more powerful appeal than I have so far believed: I have repeatedly been under fire for relying too much on academic practice for examples and paradigms.

4 See Hulme, T. E., Speculations, 2nd edn. (London, 1936), 162ff.Google Scholar

5 Kenner, Hugh, The Poems of Ezra Pound (Norfolk, Connecticut, 1951), 90.Google Scholar

6 I have tried to deal with some of these problems elsewhere. See my articles ‘On Unilluminating Criticism’, British Journal of Aesthetics 21 (1981)Google Scholar, and ‘Criticism and Appreciation’, in Lamarque, Peter ed., Philosophy and Fiction. Essays in Literary Aesthetics, (Aberdeen, 1983).Google Scholar

7 Harmondsworth, , 1970, 21.Google Scholar

8 Ibid., 13.

9 Allen, Walter, The English Novel (Harmondsworth, 1958), 185.Google ScholarPubMed

10 Nagel, Thomas, Mortal Questions (Cambridge, 1979), ix.Google Scholar

11 Robson, W. W., Modern English Literature (Oxford, 1970), 154.Google Scholar

12 ‘The Study of Poetry’ in English Literature and Irish Politics. The Complete Prose Works of Matthew Arnold, IX, Super, R. H. (ed.) (Ann Arbor, 1973), 161162.Google Scholar

13 Trilling, Lionel, ‘Introduction’, Little Dorrit (Oxford Ill. Dickens) (Oxford, 1953), viGoogle Scholar. I have found occasion to quote this before. See my ‘Literary Aesthetics and Literary Practice’, Mind 90 (1981), but it bears repeating.Google Scholar