Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T05:19:13.159Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Relationship of Empathy to Moral Reasoning in First-Year Medical Students

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2009

Donnie J. Self ,
Geetha Gopalakrishnan ,
William Robert Kiser  and
Margie Olivarez
Donnie J. Self
Affiliation:
A Professor in the Departments of Humanities in Medicine, Philosophy, and Pediatrics, Texas A&M University College of Medicine, College Station, Texas.
Geetha Gopalakrishnan
Affiliation:
A resident in the Department of Internal Medicine, Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, Rhode Island.
William Robert Kiser
Affiliation:
Associate Director of the Family Practice Residency Training Program, Naval Hospital, Jacksonville, Florida.
Margie Olivarez
Affiliation:
Research Assistant in the Department of Humanities in Medicine, Texas A&M University College of Medicine, College Station, Texas.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Norman Rockwell image of the American physician who fixed the broken arm of a child, treated the father for hypertension, and brought an unborn child into this world is now almost nonexistent. Since the time of the Rockwell portrait, a highly technical medical industry has evolved. Now two-thirds of physicians are board certified in subspecialties, and patients visit an average of 3–4 different physicians per year. Today's physicians see themselves less as “benevolent and wise counselors overseeing the patient's welfare and more as objective scientists applying the latest technical methods to bring about the desired end.” The intimate patient-physician relationship that was once the norm in our society is rapidly disappearing.

Type
Special Section: Compassion: What Does It Really Mean?
Information
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics , Volume 4 , Issue 4 , Fall 1995 , pp. 448 - 453
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Loewy, EH. Teaching medical ethics to medical students. Journal of Medical Education 1986;61:661–5.Google ScholarPubMed

2. Kohlberg, L. Moral stages and moralization: the cognitive developmental approach. In: Lickona, T, Ed. Moral Development and Moral Behavior: Theory, Research and Social Issues. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1976:31–53.Google Scholar

3. Kohlberg, L. Stage and sequence: the cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In: Goslin, D, Ed. Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1969:347–480.Google Scholar

4. Kohlberg, L. Essays on Moral Development: Vol. II The Psychology of Moral Development. San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1984.Google Scholar

5. Colby, A, Kohlberg, L. The Measurement of Moral Judgment: Vol. I. Theoretical Foundations and Research Validation. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

6. Gilligan, C. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge, Massa chusetts: Harvard University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

7. Noddings, N. Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1984.Google Scholar

8. Gilligan, C. In a different voice: women's conceptions of self and morality. Harvard Educational Review 1977;47(4):481–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9. Gilligan, C, Attanucci, J. Two moral orientations: gender differences and similarities. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly. 1988;34:223–37.Google Scholar

10. Gilligan, C, Johnston, DK, Miller, B. Moral Voice, Adolescent Development, and Secondary Education: A Study at the Green River School. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Center for the Study of Gender, Education, and Human Development, Harvard University, Monograph #3, 1988.Google Scholar

11. Gilligan, C. Moral orientation and moral development. In: Kittay, EF, Meyers, DT, Eds. Women and Moral Theory. Savage, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield, 1987:19–33.Google Scholar

12. Self, DJ, Jecker, NJ, Baldwin, DC Jr, Shadduck, JA. Moral orientations of justice and care among veterinarians entering veterinary practice. Journal of American Veterinary Medical Association 1991;199:569–73.Google ScholarPubMed

13. Self DJ, Jecker NJ, Baldwin DC Jr. A preliminary study of the moral orientations of justice and care among graduating medical students [unpublished manuscript].

14. Self, DJ, Olivarez, M. The influence of gender on conflicts of interest in the allocation of limited critical care resources: justice vs. care. Journal of Critical Care 1993;8(1):64–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15. Hoffman, ML. Empathy, social cognition, and moral action. In: Kurtines, WM, Gerwirtz, JL, Eds. Handbook of Moral Behavior and Development. Vol. I. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum, 1991:275–301.Google Scholar

16. Davis, MH. Measuring individual differences in empathy: evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1983;44(1):113–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17. Rest, JR. Development in Judging Moral Issues. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1979.Google Scholar

18. Alozie, CF. An analysis of the interrelationship of two measures used in the measurement of moral judgment development: the Kohlberg Judgment Interview and the Rest Defining Issues Test [Dissertation]. Minnesota: University of Minneapolis, 1976.Google Scholar

19. Rest, JR. Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory. New York: Praeger, 1986.Google Scholar

20. Baldwin, DC Jr, Daugherty, SF, Self, DJ. Changes in moral reasoning during medical school. Academic Medicine 1991;66 (Supp):1–3.Google ScholarPubMed

21. Dobrin, A. Ethical judgments of male and female social workers. Social Work 1989;34:451–5.Google Scholar