Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T20:34:57.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“Medical Friendships” in Assisted Dying

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2004

CHALMERS C. CLARK
Affiliation:
Chalmers C. Clark, Ph.D., is Visiting Scholar in the Bioethics Project at the Institute for Social and Policy Studies, Yale University. His research interests are applied ethics, trust, and naturalized epistemology
GERRIT K. KIMSMA
Affiliation:
Gerrit K. Kimsma, M.D., is a family practitioner and philosopher who lectures on family practice and medical ethics in the Departments of Family and Nursing Home Medicine and Philosophy and Medial Ethics at the Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Extract

As the issue of assisted dying continues toward more expanded legal standing, we shift our primary focus from questions of patients' rights to the largely overlooked challenges that face physicians who elect to assist patients in ending their lives. Dr. Howard Grossman, a Manhattan internist and plaintiff in the unsuccessful New York lawsuit to the Supreme Court (Vacco v. Quill), came forward to say, “Anybody who has done it knows that it is a tremendous decision that you carry with you forever.”1 We focus our attention on the psychological experience and philosophical conflicts faced by physicians engaged in physician-assisted dying (PAD). Based on those potential conflicts, we argue for a new model of the physician and patient relationship in assisted dying: a medical friendship.We wish to express our most sincere appreciation to all the physicians who spoke so openly and generously about what can only be described as profound and life-altering experiences with dying patients. We also wish to thank the Section of Philosophy and Medical Ethics of the Vrije Universiteit Medical Center (Professor Evert van Leeuwen, Ph.D., Chair) for consenting to serve as the host institution for this study. This project was also made possible by a generous grant from the Research Foundation of the Professional Staff Congress of the City University of New York.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)