Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T06:50:50.101Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Equality: A Response

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2010

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Aristotle, , Politics, V ii.Google Scholar

2 I refer here, of course, to an invigorating critique of the ideal of equality by the philosopher Flew, Antony, in The Politics of Procrustes (London: Temple Smith, 1981).Google Scholar

3 Miller, see above, 85.

4 Miller, see above, 84.

5 I do not have space to exemplify the immense variety of things which one egalitarian or another thinks might be candidates for equalization but I have mentioned some of them in The Egalitarian Conceit, Centre for Policy Studies (London, 1989).Google Scholar

6 Some moral theorists, such as Professor David Raphael, even invented a whole class of such rights for people, called ‘rights of recipience’.

7 This is the source of one of the more interesting forms of self-contradiction with which egalitarianism is riddled. Among those who find the point of their lives in ‘struggling against’ inequalities are the egalitarians themselves. As Marx presciently noted, there would be no place for him in a communist society.

8 Hibbert, Christopher, The French Revolution (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1980), 247.Google Scholar