Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T10:57:49.729Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Late bilinguals see a scan in scannerAND in scandal: dissecting formal overlap from morphological priming in the processing of derived words

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2014

VERA HEYER  and
HARALD CLAHSEN
VERA HEYER*
Affiliation:
Potsdam Research Institute for Multilingualism (PRIM), University of Potsdam
HARALD CLAHSEN
Affiliation:
Potsdam Research Institute for Multilingualism (PRIM), University of Potsdam
*
Address for correspondence: Vera Heyer, University of Potsdam, Potsdam Research Institute for Multilingualism, Karl-Liebknecht-Strasse 24-25, 14476Potsdamvera.heyer@uni-potsdam.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Masked priming research with late (non-native) bilinguals has reported facilitation effects following morphologically derived prime words (scanner – scan). However, unlike for native speakers, there are suggestions that purely orthographic prime-target overlap (scandal – scan) also produces priming in non-native visual word recognition. Our study directly compares orthographically related and derived prime-target pairs. While native readers showed morphological but not formal overlap priming, the two prime types yielded the same magnitudes of facilitation for non-natives. We argue that early word recognition processes in a non-native language are more influenced by surface-form properties than in one's native language.

Keywords

Masked priminglate bilingualsderivationorthographic overlap
Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , July 2015 , pp. 543 - 550
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allan, D. (2004). Oxford Placement Test 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bates, D., & Sarkar, D. (2007). lme4: linear mixed effects models using S4 classes (R package version 0.999999–0).Google Scholar
Box, G. E. P., & Cox, D. R. (1964). An analysis of transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 26, 211–252.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006). Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Neubauer, K. (2010). Morphology, frequency, and the processing of derived words in native and non-native speakers. Lingua, 120, 2627–2637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, C. J. (2000). Match Calculator. Software. [http://www.pc.rhul.ac.uk/staff/c.davis/Utilities/ MatchCalc/index.htm].Google Scholar
Diependaele, K., Duñabeitia, J. A., Morris, J., & Keuleers, E. (2011). Fast morphological effects in first and second language word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 344–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duñabeitia, J. A., Dimitropoulou, M., Morris, J., & Diependaele, K. (2013). The role of form in morphological priming: Evidence from bilinguals. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 967–987.Google Scholar
Feldman, L. B., Kostić, A., Basnight-Brown, D. M., Filipović Đurdević, Đ., & Pastizzo, M. J. (2010). Morphological facilitation for regular and irregular verb formation in native and non-native speakers: Little evidence for two distinct mechanisms. Bilingualism, 13, 119–135.Google Scholar
Forster, K. I. (1998). The pros and cons of masked priming. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27, 203–233.Google Scholar
Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods Instruments and Computers, 35, 116–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forster, K. I., Mohan, K., & Hector, J. (2003). The mechanics of masked priming. In Kinoshita, S. & Lupker, S. J. (eds.), Masked priming. The state of the art, pp. 3–37. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Kırkıcı, B., & Clahsen, H. (2013). Inflection and derivation in native and non-native language processing: Masked priming experiments on Turkish. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 776–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, J. L. (2006). Beyond the critical period: Processing-based explanations for poor grammaticality judgment performance by late second language learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 381–401.Google Scholar
Neubauer, K. (2010). The processing of inflection and derivation in German as a second language. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Essex.Google Scholar
Oxford University Press, & Cambridge ESOL. (2001). Quick Placement Test. (CD-ROM). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team. (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [http://www.R-project.org].Google Scholar
Silva, R., & Clahsen, H. (2008). Morphologically complex words in L1 and L2 processing: Evidence from masked priming experiments in English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 245–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar