Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T13:26:32.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kant's Only Possible Argument and Chignell's Real Harmony

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2014

Uygar Abaci
Uygar Abaci*
Affiliation:
University of Richmond Email: uabaci@richmond.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Andrew Chignell recently proposed an original reconstruction of Kant's ‘Only Possible Argument’ for the existence of God. Chignell claims that what motivates the ‘Grounding Premise’ of Kant's proof, ‘real possibility must be grounded in actuality’, is the requirement that the predicates of a really possible thing must be ‘really harmonious’, i.e. compatible in an extra-logical or metaphysical sense. I take issue with Chignell's reconstruction. First, the pre-Critical Kant does not present ‘real harmony’ as a general condition of real possibility. Second, the real harmony requirement is not what motivates the ‘Grounding Premise’ of the proof. Instead, this premise is sufficiently motivated by what Chignell labels the ‘content’ requirement. Finally, Kant's downgrading of the proof in his Critical period is not based on a concern regarding the real harmony of the predicates of God, but on his Critical restrictions on cognition in general and modal cognition in particular.

Keywords

KantmodalitypossibilityharmonyGod's existence
Type
Articles
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , March 2014 , pp. 1 - 25
Copyright
Copyright © Kantian Review 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Robert (2000) ‘God, Possibility, and Kant’. Faith and Philosophy, 17/4, 425–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas (1948) S. Thomae Aquinatis Summa theologiae cum textu ex recensione leonine. Turin: Marii E. Marietti.Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Alexander (1779) Metaphysica. 2nd edn. Halle.Google Scholar
Beck, Lewis W. (1969) Early German Philosophy: Kant and his Predecessors. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chignell, Andrew (2009) ‘Kant, Modality, and the Most Being’. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 91, 157–192.Google Scholar
Chignell, Andrew (2012) ‘Kant, Real Possibility, and the Threat of Spinoza’. Mind, 121/483, 635–675.Google Scholar
Crusius, Christian August (1964) Entwurf der Nothwendigen Vernunft-Wahrheiten. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.Google Scholar
Dell'Oro, Regina O. M. (1994) From Existence to the Ideal: Continuity and Development in Kant's Theology. New York: P. Lang.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, J. (1966) Lectura in librum primum Sententiarum. In Opera Omnia. Vatican City: Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis.Google Scholar
England, Frederick E. (1930) Kant's Conception of God. New York: Dial Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, MarkWatkins, Eric (1998) ‘Kant on the Material Ground of Possibility: From The Only Possible Argument to The Critique of Pure Reason’. Review of Metaphysics, 52, 369–395.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2006) Kant. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter (1960) Der Ontologische Gottesbeweis: Sein Problem und seine Geschichte in der Neuzeit. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1902–) Gesammelte Schriften ed. Akademie der Wissenschaften (formerly Königliche Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften). 29 vols. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1755) A New Elucidation of the First Principles of Metaphysical Cognition. In Theoretical Philosophy 1755–1770, ed. D. Walford and R. Meerbote (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 1–45. [NE].Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1763) The Only Possible Argument in Support of a Demonstration of the Existence of God. In Theoretical Philosophy 1755–1770, ed. D. Walford and R. Meerbote (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 107–201. [OPA].Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1763) An Attempt to Introduce the Concept of Negative Magnitudes into Philosophy. In Theoretical Philosophy 1755–1770, ed. D. Walford and R. Meerbote (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 203–241. [Negative Magnitudes].Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996) Religion and Rational Theology, trans. and ed. Allen W. Wood and George Di Giovanni. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1998) Critique of Pure Reason, trans. and ed. Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Laberge, Pierre (1973) La Théologie Kantienne précritique. Ottawa: Éditions de l'Université d'Ottawa.Google Scholar
Lamacchia, Ada (1969) La filosofia della religione in Kant. Manduria: Lacaita Editore.Google Scholar
Logan, I. (2007) ‘Whatever Happened to Kant's Ontological Argument?’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 74, 346–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sala, Giovanni B. (1990) Kant und die Frage nach Gott: Gottesbeweise und Gottesbeweiskritik in den Schriften Kants. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schmucker, Joseph (1972) ‘On the Development of Kant's Transcendental Theology’. In L. W. Beck (ed.), Proceedings of the Third International Kant Congress (Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co.), 495–500.Google Scholar
Schmucker, Joseph (1980) Die Ontotheologie des vorkritischen Kant. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schönfeld, Martin (2000) The Philosophy of the Young Kant: The Precritical Project. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Norman Kemp (2003) A Commentary to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Stang, Nicholas (2010) ‘Kant's Possibility Proof’. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 27/3, 275–299.Google Scholar
Suárez, F. (1965) Disputationes Metaphysicae. Hildesheim: G. Olms.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian (1962) Philosophia prima sive Ontologia [1736]. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian (1983) Vernünftige Gedanken von Gott, der Welt und der Seele des Menschen, auch allen Dingen überhaupt. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen W. (1978) Kant's Rational Theology. Ithaca, NY, and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar