Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T03:13:38.338Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Throwing Oneself Away: Kant on the Forfeiture of Respect

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2014

Aaron Bunch
Aaron Bunch*
Affiliation:
Washington State University Email: aaron@aaronbunch.net
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Surprisingly often Kant asserts that it is possible to behave in such a degrading way that one ‘throws oneself away’ and turns oneself ‘into a thing’, as a result of which others may treat one ‘as they please’. Rather than dismiss these claims out of hand, I argue that they force us to reconsider what is meant and required by ‘respect for humanity’. I argue that to ‘throw away’ humanity is not to lose or extinguish it, but rather to refuse or otherwise fail to claim the respect that it authorizes one to claim. If I refuse or fail to make this claim, there is a sense in which I become a thing, and I leave others no choice but to treat me as such. This is compatible with their respect for humanity in my person.

Keywords

humanityrespectcontemptpredispositiongood willduties to oneselfcrimina carnissuicidemasturbationservilityavaricelying
Type
Articles
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , March 2014 , pp. 71 - 91
Copyright
Copyright © Kantian Review 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Elizabeth (2008) ‘Emotions in Kant's Later Moral Philosophy: Honour and the Phenomenology of Moral Value’. In Monika Betzler (ed.), Kant's Ethics of Virtue (Berlin and New York: de Gruyter), 123–146.Google Scholar
Blackwell, Mark (2004) ‘“Extraneous Bodies”: The Contagion of Live-Tooth Transplantation in Late Eighteenth-Century England’. Eighteenth-Century Life, 28/1, 21–68.Google Scholar
Byrd, B. SharonHruschka, Joachim (2010) Kant's Doctrine of Right: A Commentary. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen (2008) ‘Kant on Respect, Dignity, and the Duty of Respect’. In Monika Betzler (ed.), Kant's Ethics of Virtue (Berlin and New York: de Gruyter), 175–200.Google Scholar
Dean, Richard (2006) The Value of Humanity in Kant's Moral Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denis, Lara (2010) ‘Humanity, Obligation, and the Good Will: An Argument Against Dean's Interpretation of humanity’. Kantian Review, 15/1, 118–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Thomas E. (1992) Dignity and Practical Reason in Kant's Moral Theory. Ithaca, NY, and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1902) Gesammelte Schriften. Berlin: de Gruyter, formerly Georg Reimer.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1999) Practical Philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2001a) Lectures on Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2001b) Religion and Rational Theology. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2004) Vorlesung zur Moralphilosophie. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2011) Anthropology, History, and Education. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. (1996) Creating the Kingdom of Ends. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Laqueur, Thomas W. (2003) Solitary Sex: A Cultural History of Masturbation. Cambridge and London: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen (1999) Kant's Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen (2008) Kantian Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar