Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T07:53:39.369Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of maternal coffee, smoking and drinking behavior on adult son's semen quality: prospective evidence from the Child Health and Development Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2011

P. M. Cirillo ,
B. A. Cohn ,
N. Y. Krigbaum ,
M. Lee ,
C. Brazil  and
P. Factor-Litvak
P. M. Cirillo*
Affiliation:
Child Health and Development Studies, Public Health Institute, Berkeley, CA, USA
B. A. Cohn
Affiliation:
Child Health and Development Studies, Public Health Institute, Berkeley, CA, USA
N. Y. Krigbaum
Affiliation:
Child Health and Development Studies, Public Health Institute, Berkeley, CA, USA
M. Lee
Affiliation:
Child Health and Development Studies, Public Health Institute, Berkeley, CA, USA
C. Brazil
Affiliation:
Institute of Toxicology and Environmental Health, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
P. Factor-Litvak
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
*
*Address for correspondence: P. M. Cirillo, Child Health and Development Studies, Public Health Institute, 1683 Shattuck Avenue, Suite B, Berkeley, CA 94709, USA. (Email pcirillo@chdstudies.org)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Fetal exposure to caffeine is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Animal and human studies suggest that caffeine may have effects on the developing reproductive system. Here we report on mothers’ smoking, coffee and alcohol use, recorded during pregnancy, and semen quality in sons in the age group of 38–47 years. Subjects were a subset of the Child Health and Development Studies, a pregnancy cohort enrolled between 1959 and 1967 in the Kaiser Foundation Health Plan near Oakland, California. In 2005, adult sons participated in a follow-up study (n = 338) and semen samples were donated by 196 participants. Samples were analyzed for sperm concentration, motility and morphology according to the National Cooperative Reproductive Medicine Network (Fertile Male Study) Protocol. Mean sperm concentration was reduced by approximately 16 million sperms for sons with high prenatal exposure (5 cups of maternal coffee use per day) compared with unexposed sons (P-value for decreasing trend = 0.09), which translates to a proportionate reduction of 25%. Mean percent motile sperm decreased by approximately 7 points (P-value = 0.04), a proportionate decline of 13%, and mean percent sperm with normal morphology decreased by approximately 2 points (P-value = 0.01), a proportionate decline of 25%. Maternal cigarette and alcohol use were not associated with son's semen quality. Adjusting for son's contemporary coffee, alcohol and cigarette use did not explain the maternal associations. Findings for son's coffee intake and father's prenatal coffee, cigarette and alcohol use were non-significant and inconclusive. These results contribute to the evidence that maternal coffee use during pregnancy may impair the reproductive development of the male fetus.

Keywords

coffeeprenatal exposuresperm concentrationsperm motilitysperm morphology
Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease , Volume 2 , Special Issue 6: The Early Determinants of Adult Health Study , December 2011 , pp. 375 - 386
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the International Society for Developmental Origins of Health and Disease 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Skakkebaek, NE, Rajpert-De Meyts, E, Main, KM. Testicular dysgenesis syndrome: an increasingly common developmental disorder with environmental aspects. Hum Reprod. 2001; 16, 972–978.Google Scholar
2. Thorup, J, McLachlan, R, Cortes, D, et al. What is new in cryptorchidism and hypospadias – a critical review on the testicular dysgenesis hypothesis. J Pediatr Surg. 2010; 45, 2074–2086.Google Scholar
3. Jorgensen, N, Meyts, ER, Main, KM, Skakkebaek, NE. Testicular dysgenesis syndrome comprises some but not all cases of hypospadias and impaired spermatogenesis. Int J Androl. 2010; 33, 298–303.Google Scholar
4. Mocarelli, P, Gerthoux, PM, Patterson, DG Jr, et al. Dioxin exposure, from infancy through puberty, produces endocrine disruption and affects human semen quality. Environ Health Perspect. 2008; 116, 70–77.Google Scholar
5. Sadeu, JC, Hughes, CL, Agarwal, S, Foster, WG. Alcohol, drugs, caffeine, tobacco, and environmental contaminant exposure: reproductive health consequences and clinical implications. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2010; 40, 633–652.Google Scholar
6. Ramlau-Hansen, CH, Thulstrup, AM, Bonde, JP, Olsen, J, Bech, BH. Semen quality according to prenatal coffee and present caffeine exposure: two decades of follow-up of a pregnancy cohort. Hum Reprod. 2008; 23, 2799–2805.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Ramlau-Hansen, CH, Thulstrup, AM, Olsen, J, et al. Maternal smoking in pregnancy and reproductive hormones in adult sons. Int J Androl. 2008; 31, 565–572.Google Scholar
8. Ramlau-Hansen, CH, Thulstrup, AM, Storgaard, L, et al. Is prenatal exposure to tobacco smoking a cause of poor semen quality? A follow-up study. Am J Epidemiol. 2007; 165, 1372–1379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Ramlau-Hansen, CH, Toft, G, Jensen, MS, et al. Maternal alcohol consumption during pregnancy and semen quality in the male offspring: two decades of follow-up. Hum Reprod. 2010; 25, 2340–2345.Google Scholar
10. Li, Y, Lin, H, Li, Y, Cao, J. Association between socio-psycho-behavioral factors and male semen quality: systematic review and meta-analyses. Fertil Steril. 2011; 95, 116–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Sharpe, RM. Environmental/lifestyle effects on spermatogenesis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010; 365, 1697–1712.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Jensen, TK, Henriksen, TB, Hjollund, NH, et al. Adult and prenatal exposures to tobacco smoke as risk indicators of fertility among 430 Danish couples. Am J Epidemiol. 1998; 148, 992–997.Google Scholar
13. Jensen, TK, Henriksen, TB, Hjollund, NHI, et al. Caffeine intake and fecundability: a follow-up study among 430 Danish couples planning their first pregnancy. Reprod Toxicol. 1998; 12, 289–295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. van den Berg, BJ, Christianson, RE, Oechsli, FW. The California Child Health and Development Studies of the School of Public Health, University of California at Berkeley. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1988; 2, 265–282.Google Scholar
15. Guzick, DS, Carson, S, Coutifaris, C, et al. Efficacy of superovulation and intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infertility. National Cooperative Reproductive Medicine Network. N Engl J Med. 1999; 340, 177–183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Overstreet, JW, Brazil, C. Semen analysis. In Infertility in the Male (eds. Lipshultz LI, Howard SS), 3rd edn, 1997; pp. 487–490. Mosby-Year Book, Inc., St Louis.Google Scholar
17. Brazil, C, Swan, SH, Drobnis, EZ, et al. Standardized methods for semen evaluation in a multicenter research study. J Androl. 2004; 25, 635–644.Google Scholar
18. World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Semen–Cervical Mucus Interaction, 4th edn, 1999. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
19. Brazil, C, Swan, SH, Tollner, CR, et al. Quality control of laboratory methods for semen evaluation in a multicenter research study. J Androl. 2004; 25, 645–656.Google Scholar
20. Istvan, J, Matarazzo, JD. Tobacco, alcohol, and caffeine use: a review of their interrelationships. Psychol Bull. 1984; 95, 301–326.Google Scholar
21. Talcott, GW, Poston, WS II, Haddock, CK. Co-occurrent use of cigarettes, alcohol, and caffeine in a retired military population. Mil Med. 1998; 163, 133–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Zavela, KJ, Barnett, JE, Smedi, KJ, Istvan, JA, Matarazzo, JD. Concurrent use of cigarettes, alcohol, and coffee. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1990; 20, 835–845.Google Scholar
23. Mongraw-Chaffin, ML, Cohn, BA, Cohen, RD, Christianson, RE. Maternal smoking, alcohol consumption, and caffeine consumption during pregnancy in relation to a son's risk of persistent cryptorchidism: a prospective study in the Child Health and Development Studies Cohort, 1959–1967. Am J Epidemiol. 2008; 167, 257–261.Google Scholar
24. Mortimer, D, Templeton, AA, Lenton, EA, Coleman, RA. Influence of abstinence and ejaculation-to-analysis delay on semen analysis parameters of suspected infertile men. Arch Androl. 1982; 8, 251–256.Google Scholar
25. De Jonge, C, LaFromboise, M, Bosmans, E, et al. Influence of the abstinence period on human sperm quality. Fertil Steril. 2004; 82, 57–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. Shanis, BS, Check, JH, Bollendorf, A. Interpretation and misinterpretation of semen parameters. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 1989; 23, 213–227.Google Scholar
27. Grosso, LM, Bracken, MB. Caffeine metabolism, genetics, and perinatal outcomes: a review of exposure assessment considerations during pregnancy. Ann Epidemiol. 2005; 15, 460–466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28. Guzick, DS, Overstreet, JW, Factor-Litvak, P, et al. Sperm morphology, motility, and concentration in fertile and infertile men. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345, 1388–1393.Google Scholar
29. Pollard, I, Locquet, O, Solvar, A, Magre, S. Effects of caffeine and its reactive metabolites theophylline and theobromine on the differentiating testis. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2001; 13, 435–441.Google Scholar
30. Petridou, E, Katsouyanni, K, Spanos, E, et al. Pregnancy estrogens in relation to coffee and alcohol intake. Ann Epidemiol. 1992; 2, 241–247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31. Svartberg, J, Midtby, M, Bonaa, KH, et al. The associations of age, lifestyle factors and chronic disease with testosterone in men: the Tromso Study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2003; 149, 145–152.Google Scholar
32. Jensen, TK, Swan, SH, Skakkebaek, NE, Rasmussen, S, Jorgensen, N. Caffeine intake and semen quality in a population of 2,554 young Danish men. Am J Epidemiol. 2010; 171, 883–891.Google Scholar
33. Cooper, TG, Noonan, E, von Eckardstein, S, et al. World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics. Hum Reprod Update. 2010; 16, 231–245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34. Overstreet, JW. Laboratory tests for human male reproductive risk assessment. Teratog Carcinog Mutagen. 1984; 4, 67–82.Google Scholar
35. Cohn, BA, Overstreet, JW, Fogel, RJ, et al. Epidemiologic studies of human semen quality: considerations for study design. Am J Epidemiol. 2002; 155, 664–671.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36. Kidd, SA, Eskenazi, B, Wyrobek, AJ. Effects of male age on semen quality and fertility: a review of the literature. Fertil Steril. 2001; 75, 237–248.Google Scholar
37. American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Nutrition During Pregnancy. Patient Education Pamphlet AP001, August, 2010.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Cirillo Supplementary Table

Supplemental Table 1. Characteristics of semen measures from an adult follow-up study (SER) of sons in the Child Health & Development Studies

Download Cirillo Supplementary Table(File)
File 52.7 KB