Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T00:25:59.465Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A holistic, dynamic model to quantify and mitigate the environmental impacts of cattle farming

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2015

J.-M. Katajajuuri*
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), New Business Opportunities, Latokartanonkaari 9, FI-00790 Helsinki, Finland
H. Pulkkinen
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), New Business Opportunities, Latokartanonkaari 9, FI-00790 Helsinki, Finland
S. Hietala
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), New Business Opportunities, PO Box 413, FI-90014 University of Oulu, Finland
K. Järvenranta
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Green Technology, Halolantie 31 A, FI-71750 Maaninka, Finland
P. Virkajärvi
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Green Technology, Halolantie 31 A, FI-71750 Maaninka, Finland
J. I. Nousiainen
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), New Business Opportunities, Myllytie 1, FI-31600 Jokioinen, Finland
A. Huuskonen
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Green Technology, Tutkimusasemantie 15, FI-92400 Ruukki, Finland
Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Full Paper
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gerber, PJ, Steinfeld, H, Henderson, B, Mottet, A, Opio, C, Dijkman, J, Falcucci, A and Tempio, G 2013a. Tackling climate change through livestock: a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
Gerber, PJ, Hristov, A, Henderson, B, Makkar, H, Oh, J, Lee, C, Meinen, R, Montes, F, Ott, T and Firkins, J 2013b. Technical options for the mitigation of direct methane and nitrous oxide emissions from livestock: a review. Animal 7 (suppl. 2), 220234.Google Scholar
Glatzle, A 2014. Questioning key conclusions of FAO publications ‘Livestock’s Long Shadow’ (2006) appearing again in ‘Tackling Climate Change Through Livestock’ (2013). Pastoralism 4, 16.Google Scholar
Herrero, M, Gerber, P, Vellinga, T, Garnett, T, Leip, A, Opio, C, Westhoek, H, Thornton, P, Olesen, J and Hutchings, N 2011. Livestock and greenhouse gas emissions: the importance of getting the numbers right. Animal Feed Science and Technology 166, 779782.Google Scholar
IPCC 2006. Agriculture, Forestry and other Land Use, vol. 4, IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. IGES, Japan. http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/index.html Google Scholar
Ramin, M and Huhtanen, P 2013. Development of equations for predicting methane emissions from ruminants. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 24762493.Google Scholar
Regina, K, Kaseva, J and Esala, M 2013. Emissions of nitrous oxide from boreal agricultural mineral soils – statistical models based on measurements. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 164, 131136.Google Scholar
Steinfeld, H, Gerber, P, Wassenaar, T, Castel, V, Rosales, M and de Haan, C 2006. Livestock’s long shadow. FAO, Rome.Google Scholar