Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T19:41:42.528Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Determination of rumen microbial-nitrogen production in sheep: a comparison of urinary purine excretion with methods using 15N and purine bases as markers of microbial-nitrogen entering the duodenum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

J. F. erez ,
J. Balcells ,
J. A. Guada  and
C. Castrillo
J. F. erez
Affiliation:
Departamento de Produccióon Animal y Ciencia de los Alimentos, Facultad de Veterinaria, M.Servet 177, Zaragoza 50013, Spain
J. Balcells
Affiliation:
Departamento de Produccióon Animal y Ciencia de los Alimentos, Facultad de Veterinaria, M.Servet 177, Zaragoza 50013, Spain
J. A. Guada
Affiliation:
Departamento de Produccióon Animal y Ciencia de los Alimentos, Facultad de Veterinaria, M.Servet 177, Zaragoza 50013, Spain
C. Castrillo
Affiliation:
Departamento de Produccióon Animal y Ciencia de los Alimentos, Facultad de Veterinaria, M.Servet 177, Zaragoza 50013, Spain
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The present study compares estimates of rumen microbial-N production derived from duodenal flow measurements (15N and purine bases) with those from measurements of the urinary excretion of purine derivatives. Four Rasa Aragonesa ewes fitted with simple cannulas in the rumen and proximal duodenum were used. Four diets consisting of 550 g lucerne (Medicago sativa) hay/d as sole feed or supplemented with 220, 400 and 550 g rolled barley grain/d were given in a 4 x 4 random factorial arrangement. Duodenal digesta flows were determined by the dual-phase marker technique during continuous intraruminal infusions of Co-EDTA and Yb-acetate. Microbial contribution to the non-NH3N (NAN)flow was estimated from 15N enrichment and purines: N ratio in duodenal digesta and bacterial fractions isolated from the rumen content. Whole tract organic matter (OM) digestibility and duodenal flow of OM and NAN increased (P<0·001) with the level of barley supplementation. Digestible OM intake ranged from 19·0 to 42·7 g/kg metabolic weight (W0·75) and the duodenal flow of purine bases and the urinary excretion of allantoin increased Linearly (P < 0·001) from minimum values of 7·47 (SD 1·524)and 4·65 (SD 0·705) mmol/d respectively on the basal diet to 18·20 (SD 1·751) and 11·62 (SD 0·214) mmol/d on the 400 g barley diet; a further increase in barley supplementation decreased both variables (13/50 (SD 2/334) and 8/77 (SD 0/617) mmol/d respectively). Urinary excretion of uric acid and hypoxanthine showed a slight but significant increase (P < 0·05) over all levels of barley. Molar recoveries of duodenal purine bases as purine derivatives or allantoin in the urine were 0·78 (SD 0·156) and 0·65 (SD 0·130) respectively. The increase on barley supplementation significantly augmented microbial-N, but large differences between microbial markers employed were observed. Mean values of microbial-N estimated from the duodenal purine bases or urinary allantoin excretion were on average 18 and 29% lower than those measured by 15N.

Keywords

Microbial synthesisPurine excretionSheep
Type
Microbial synthesis in sheep: 15N v. purine excretion
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 75 , Issue 5 , May 1996 , pp. 699 - 709
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1996

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council (1984). The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Slough:Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Balcells, J., Fondevila, M., Guada, J. A., Castrillo, C. & Surra, J. C. E. (1993 a) Urinary excretions of purine derivatives and nitrogen in sheep given straw supplemented with different sources of carbohydrates. Animal Production 57. 287–292.Google Scholar
Balcells, J., Guada, J. A., Castrillo, C. & Gasa, J. (1991). Urinary excretion of allantoin and allantoin precursors by sheep after different rates of purine infusion into the duodenum. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 116, 309–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balcells, J., Guada, J. A., Castrillo, C. & Gasa, J. (1993 b). Rumen digestion andurinary excretion of purine derivatives in response to urea supplementation of sodium-treated straw fed to sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 69, 721–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balcells, J., Guada, J. A., Peiró, J. M. & Parker, D. S. (1992). Simultaneous determination of allantoin and oxypurines in biological fluids by high-performance liquid chromatography. Journal of Chromatography 575, 153–157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broderick, G. A. & Merchen, N. R. (1992). Markers for quantifying microbial protein synthesis in the rumen. Journal of Dairy Science 75, 2618–2632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cecava, M. J., Merchen, N. R., Gay, L. C. & Berger, L. L. (1990). Composition of ruminal bacteria harvested from steers as influenced by dietary energy level, feeding frequency, and isolation techniques. Journal of Dairy Science 73, 2480–2488.Google Scholar
Craig, W. M., Broderick, G. A. & Ricker, D. B. (1987 a). Quantitation of microorganisms associated with the particulate phase of ruminal digesta. Journal of Nutrition 117, 56–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, W. M., Brown, D. R., Broderick, A. & Ricker, D. B. (1987 b) Post-prandial composition changes of fluid and particle-associated ruminal microorganisms. Journal of Animal Science 65, 1042–1048.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, X. B., Hovell, F. D. DeB., Ørskov, E. R. & Brown, D. S. (1990 a). Excretion of purine derivatives by ruminants:effect of exogenous nucleic acid supply on purine derivative excretion by sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 63, 131–142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, X. B., Ørskov, E. R. & Hovell, F. D. DeB. (1990 b). Excretion of purine derivatives by ruminants: endogenous excretion, differences between cattle and sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 63, 121–129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dewhurst, R. J. & Webster, A. J. F. (1992). Effects of diet, level of intake, sodium bicarbonate and monensin in urinary allantoin excretion in sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 67, 345–353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faichney, G. J. (1975). The use of markers to partition digestion within the gastrointestinal tract of ruminants. In Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant pp. 277–291 [MacDonald, I. W. and Warner, A. C. I. editors] Armidale: University of New England Publishing Unit.Google Scholar
Firkins, J. L., Berger, L. L., Merchens, N. R., Fahey, G. C. & Mulvaney, R. L. (1987). Ruminal nitrogen metabolism in steers as affected by feed intake and dietary urea concentration. Journal of Dairy Science 70, 2302–2311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fujihara, T., Ørskov, E. R., Reeds, P. J. & Kyle, D. J. (1987). The effect of protein infusion on urinary excretion of purine derivatives in ruminants nourished by intragastric nutrition. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 109, 7–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giesecke, D., Stangassinger, M. & Tiemeyer, W. (1984). Nucleic acid digestion and urinary purines metabolites in sheep nourished by intragastric infusion. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 64, 144–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goering, H. K. & Van Soest, P. J. (1975). Forage Fiber Analysis. Agricultural Research Service. Agricultural Handbook no. 379. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Ha, J. K. & Kennelly, J. J. (1984). Influence of freeze-storage on nucleic acid concentrations in bacteria and duodenal digesta. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 64, 791–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, D. G. & McAllan, A. B. (1980). Factors affecting microbial growth yields in the reticulo-men. In Digestive Physiology and Metabolism in Ruminants, pp. 205–226 [Ruckebush, Y. and Thivend, P. editors] LancasterMTP Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jouany, J. P. (1982). Volatile fatty acid and alcohol determination in digestive contents, silage juices, bacterial cultures and anaerobic fermentor contents. Sciences des Aliments 2, 131–144.Google Scholar
Legay-Carmier, F. & Bauchart, D.(1989).Distribution of bacteria in the rumen contents of dairy cows given a diet supplemented with soya-bean oil. British Journal of Nutrition 61, 725–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindberg, J. E., Bristav, H. & Manyenga, A. R. (1989). Excretion of purines in the urine of sheep in relation to duodenal flow of microbial protein. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research 19, 41–52.Google Scholar
Ling, J. R. & Buttery, P. J. (1978). The simultaneous use of ribonucleic acid, 25S, 2,6-diaminopimelic acid and 2-aminoethylphosphonic acid as markers of microbial nitrogen entering the duodenum of sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 39, 161–179.Google Scholar
McAllan, A. B. & Smith, R. H. (1973). Degradation of nucleic acids in the rumen. British Journal of Nutrition 29, 331–340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orue, S. M. Martin, Balcells, J., Guada, J. A. & Castrillo, C. (1995). Endogenous purine and pyrimidine derivative excretion in pregnant sows. British Journal of Nutrition 73, 375–385.Google Scholar
Merry, R. J. & McAllan, A. B. (1983). A comparison of the chemical composition of mixed bacteria harvested from the liquid and solid fractions of rumen digesta. British Journal of Nutrition 50, 701–709.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olubobokun, J. A. & Craig, W. M. (1990). Quantity and characteristics of microorganisms associated with ruminal fluid or particles. Journal of Animal Science 68, 3360–3370.Google Scholar
Olubobokun, J. A., Craig, W. M. & Nipper, W. A. (1988). Characteristics of protozoal and bacterial fractions from microorganisms associated with ruminal fluid or particles. Journal of Animal Science 66, 2701–2710.Google Scholar
Puchala, R. & Kulasek, G. W. (1992). Estimation of microbial protein flow from the rumen of sheep using microbial nucleic acid and urinary excretion of purine derivatives. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 72, 821–830.Google Scholar
Russell, J. B. (1984). Factors influencing competition and composition of the rumen bacterial flora. In Herbivore Nutrition in the Subtropics and Tropics, pp. 313–345 [Gilchrist, M. C. and Mackie, R. I. editors] Craighall, South Africa: The Science Press Ltd.Google Scholar
Siddons, R. C., Beever, D. E. & Nolan, J. V. (1982). A comparison of methods for the estimation of microbial nitrogen in duodenal digesta of sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 48, 377–389.Google Scholar
Smith, R. H., McAllan, A. B., Hewitt, D. & Lewis, P. E. (1978). Estimation of amounts of microbial and dietary nitrogen compounds entering the duodenum of cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 90, 557–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. & Torrie, J. H. (1960). Principles and Procedures of Statistics. London: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.Google Scholar
Webster, A. J. F.(1992). The metabolizable protein system for ruminants. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition, pp. 93–110 [Garnsworthy, P. C., Haresign, W. and Cole, D. J. A., editors] Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
Whitelaw, F. G., Eadie, J. M., Bruce, L. A. & Shand, W. J. (1984). Microbial protein synthesis in cattle given roughage-concentrate and all-concentrate diets: the use of 2,6-diaminopimelic acid, 2-aminoethylphosphonic acid and 35S as markers. British Journal of Nutrition 52, 249–260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zelaya, J. C. (1994). Degradación ruminal de las bases púricas de origen alimentario (Ruminal degradation of dietary purine bases). MSc Thesis, Instituto Agronómico Mediterraneo de Zaragoza.Google Scholar
Zinn, R. A. & Owens, F. N. (1986). A rapid procedure for purine measurement and its use for estimating net ruminal protein synthesis. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 66, 157–166.Google Scholar
Zöllner, N. (1982). Purine and pyrimidine metabolism. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 41, 329–342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed